| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 |
8621. AV needs to have a lasting effect for it to matter - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: Remember back when one person with proto swarms could chase off a tank in one magazine? That was OP. It should taek 2-3 people to down a tank in one mag. However, the pendulum has swung too far back in the other directi...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.29 23:55:00
|
8622. AV needs to have a lasting effect for it to matter - in General Discussions [original thread]
SGT NOVA STAR wrote: Yet another thread about av being under powered. So one man should stop a tank? It's called get a corp or a squad and hunt down the tank. Get a suicide jeep, get a rail tank. Your little swarm launcher won't kill a well fit...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.29 23:31:00
|
8623. AV needs to have a lasting effect for it to matter - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cass Caul wrote: lol, people all the time hate on snipers. Redlines with the mantra or "low risk, high reward." why is there not equal hate for tanks? Bring risk vs isk vs reward into an equal balance and maybe the "small victory would be almo...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.29 23:02:00
|
8624. AV needs to have a lasting effect for it to matter - in General Discussions [original thread]
jordy mack wrote: And it should make the guns fall off, and the enemy redline catch fire too. ? Also u refer to av like its one weapon... I refer to AV as a job in general. Infantry AV that is, tanks are anti everything. Also, what the ****...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.29 22:59:00
|
8625. AV needs to have a lasting effect for it to matter - in General Discussions [original thread]
I see a lot of people arguing that AV is for making tanks run away, and that if it runs away, you "won" because you forced it out of the battle. Yeah, maybe, for 10 seconds? That's the problem, there is no lasting effect, tanks just regenerate ...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.29 22:36:00
|
8626. AV had changed - in General Discussions [original thread]
The difference is that a single AV grenade handler, if has good dodging skills and can trap the Logi LAV so that it won't run, could destroy an LLAV with just himself. Can't do that against tanks.
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.29 22:27:00
|
8627. plasma rifle - in General Discussions [original thread]
Goro Scornshard wrote: If they change the assault rifle to the plasma rifle then they may as well call the combat rifle the bullet rifle No...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.29 22:25:00
|
8628. I am scared from the Russian SpacemMafia O_O - in General Discussions [original thread]
Draxus Prime wrote: I have been hired to nova knife you Cat I will find you... and when I do I will pet you ...THEN STAB YOU Implying you can find me. <--- Under 36dB/28dB
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.29 14:34:00
|
8629. if cloak is to be implemented into the game we either - in General Discussions [original thread]
While I hate scanners, they're the counter to cloaking.
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.29 14:13:00
|
8630. I slapped together an AV fit and took it for a spin today. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: Master Jaraiya wrote: Congratulations, now grab an Ishukone Assault Forge Gun and try to take out any tank while there are 3 tanks rolling around, a dropship or two circling overhead, and 4 or 5 infantry firing Prototype...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.29 09:19:00
|
8631. Should Remote Explosives Kill a Tank? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I would go as far as two RE's killing an unhardened tank.
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.29 09:09:00
|
8632. I slapped together an AV fit and took it for a spin today. - in General Discussions [original thread]
There's another problem. You might think it's a win if you rellocate a vehicle, but thing is, they regenerate uber quick and just come back and beat you to death. AV needs to do more lasting damage. For example, have an effect that significantly...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.29 08:34:00
|
8633. I slapped together an AV fit and took it for a spin today. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kasote Denzara wrote: Telling people to put effort into preventing vehicle spam? Don't be silly. They want their cake and eat it too, not get off their ass, walk to the store, pick up the cake, bring it back home, get a fork, and stuff their ...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.29 08:29:00
|
8634. Why can't we map the KB/M? This is ridiculous and stupid - in General Discussions [original thread]
Q3 of 2016
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.29 06:17:00
|
8635. Logistics Are NOT Overpowered. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Cat Merc wrote: This thread is approved by Cat Merc. It has earned the official Cat Merc Seal of Approval(CMSoP)! I shall treasure this for as long as I live. I'd give you fish in exchange, but I only have this can of tuna. ...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.29 06:15:00
|
8636. Flaylocks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Needs more direct hit damage, that is all.
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.29 06:04:00
|
8637. how much would you pay for officer weapons? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ask this guy
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.29 06:00:00
|
8638. Logistics Are NOT Overpowered. - in General Discussions [original thread]
This thread is approved by Cat Merc. It has earned the official Cat Merc Seal of Approval(CMSoP)!
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.29 05:58:00
|
8639. Why? - in General Discussions [original thread]
You have no right to complain about any difficulty at using a tank right now.
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.28 22:17:00
|
8640. Logistics Are NOT Overpowered. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Subject 36 wrote: Nobody talks about the Logi's being OP anymore. This month's QQ topic are tanks. That's because CCP already addressed this. At this point no amount of forum QQ will do anything.
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.12.28 21:55:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |