Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
3401. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sollemnis Aelinos wrote: Atiim wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Atiim wrote: Yes, but some are under the impression that it is quite literally impossible to use a Blaster in anything outside of CQC. This mean's that it is quite possible...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 12:31:00
|
3402. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Foundation Seldon wrote: Atiim wrote: Sounds personal. And what happens if I just upgrade my core skills? Any tanker worth his salt should have plenty of CPU for things like that. Missiles are my favorite turrets are Missiles, and I don't ...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 12:26:00
|
3403. Are logis still OP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mr Machine Guns wrote: it really doesn't matter what people think now CCP said they are going to find a way to nerd them I can try to find the post its under if you want And them you will move onto the next FOTM strap on a duvollle some nano...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 12:16:00
|
3404. Wrong Merc Quarters - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's a conspiracy.
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 01:38:00
|
3405. Wrong Merc Quarters - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clips A'hoy wrote: Ammatar mandate... If not then you're probably a slave. Lol I finally got around to reading your sig.
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 01:37:00
|
3406. My apologies - in General Discussions [original thread]
You should apologize more for FG.
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 01:35:00
|
3407. TANK combat. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jacques Cayton II wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Zero Harpuia wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: SILVERBACK 02 wrote: the only thing that should be able to take out a tank is... ANOTHER TANK do you agree? personally i agree.. i think ...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 01:27:00
|
3408. 1.7 Actually has lots of good stuff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Not Me.
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 01:01:00
|
3409. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: You do know you can strafe a blaster by walking left or right, it can't track you fast enough unlike rails which can hit a moving LAV twice in quick succession so you finally got a turret to shoot at you a...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 00:45:00
|
3410. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Atiim wrote: Yes, but some are under the impression that it is quite literally impossible to use a Blaster in anything outside of CQC. This mean's that it is quite possible, and with a little bit of e...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 00:42:00
|
3411. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
You do know you can strafe a blaster by walking left or right, it can't track you fast enough unlike rails which can hit a moving LAV twice in quick succession so you finally got a turret to shoot at you and ran as far as you could while remaining...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 00:30:00
|
3412. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: Turret AI OP Go take a Blaster Maddy into a fight at 550m and tell me how that works out for you Yes, but some are under the impression that it is quite literally impossible to use a Blaster in anything o...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 00:22:00
|
3413. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Turret AI OP Go take a Blaster Maddy into a fight at 550m and tell me how that works out for you You beat me to it.
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 00:20:00
|
3414. TANK combat. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zero Harpuia wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: SILVERBACK 02 wrote: the only thing that should be able to take out a tank is... ANOTHER TANK do you agree? personally i agree.. i think tanks should be a dominating presence on the battlefie...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.03 23:55:00
|
3415. o/ - in The War Room [original thread]
And you kept saying you would be the only tanker left with everyone leaving.
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.03 22:09:00
|
3416. [Request] Assault LAV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: It will still get one shotted by railgun tanks... If the tanker is a good shot, he/she will score a direct hit on you. Forget tanks installations will 1 shot you out of a moving LAV.
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.03 00:54:00
|
3417. red line rail tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Buttscratch wrote: How dare a long range attack vehicle, obviously designed to only kill other vehicles at range kill a vehicle at range!!! He hould have driven into the center of the map, got out his tank a tried using AV nades on your pyt...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.03 00:36:00
|
3418. PS3 sent for repairs (again) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alldin Kan wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: Alldin Kan wrote: Chances are it's still going to be busted and I'll have to get a PS4 too early. If it comes to that then I'll be giving out 250,000,000 ISK to the needy peasants how you going to...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.03 00:23:00
|
3419. f5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
I pressed f5 and then I face palmed.
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.03 00:22:00
|
3420. TANK combat. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alpha 443-6732 wrote: Atiim wrote: If you LOLTank Brigadiers want to be the only viable counter to yourselves, then fine. But you can't be effective at killing infantry then. This isn't World Of Tanks. And we aren't turning this into Tank ...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.03 00:20:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |