| Pages: 1 [2] 3 |
21. {REQUEST} - BOMBS FOR DROPSHIPS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: 1: I have given a argument; It can never be balanced without being OP or useless. You want it to be on a goddamn DS for gods sake. The "It has been rejected already by the pilots" just adds onto it. 2: I've thought of ...
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.06.01 09:42:00
|
22. {REQUEST} - BOMBS FOR DROPSHIPS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Again "it was rejected, a bad idea, etc". Find arguments of your own. And as I mention before - start think out of the box. Drones already was announced, right. Ewar bombs such EMP bomb i propose shall have good result against them. And can you be...
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.31 06:03:00
|
23. {REQUEST} - BOMBS FOR DROPSHIPS - in General Discussions [original thread]
That I find it briliant idea. And noone here say no to bombs. Sorry but our discussion is counterproductive. Please use arguments of your own instead " it was discouset and rejected by players" and stuff. I ask you several times about exact bombs ...
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.31 05:40:00
|
24. {REQUEST} - BOMBS FOR DROPSHIPS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sorry for you, but I disagree
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.30 21:54:00
|
25. {REQUEST} - BOMBS FOR DROPSHIPS - in General Discussions [original thread]
we'll see. It's already been thought of DUST 514 shall be uber game, but it isn't, than Rouge replace Brandon. And I think this man say - give us feedback, give us ideas. Here I am
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.30 21:31:00
|
26. {REQUEST} - BOMBS FOR DROPSHIPS - in General Discussions [original thread]
nope. My argument is - I think out of the box.
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.30 21:14:00
|
27. {REQUEST} - BOMBS FOR DROPSHIPS - in General Discussions [original thread]
and who say that bomber should not hover 20 000 years after
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.30 21:05:00
|
28. {REQUEST} - BOMBS FOR DROPSHIPS - in General Discussions [original thread]
I find it positive we all vote for bombs :)
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.30 20:51:00
|
29. {REQUEST} - BOMBS FOR DROPSHIPS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Finaly some opinion I find reasoned. First I like that you find bombs as good idea. Bombs are 50% of my idea, and I link them to dropships, beacuse they are the only flying vehidcle and as I mention, CCP say that no other bird comming in near futu...
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.30 19:50:00
|
30. {REQUEST} - BOMBS FOR DROPSHIPS - in General Discussions [original thread]
As I say its should be nice to be tested in beta. If you want your "steril" game with a little bit sand in the box - continue play on PS3. I expect more from Legion. And once again - how exactly smoke bomb is OP? Never heard it is rejected
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.30 05:32:00
|
31. {REQUEST} - BOMBS FOR DROPSHIPS - in General Discussions [original thread]
1 It depends of the situation 2 No. It just bring more sand in the box. For example if you drop smoke bomb it will affect both teams and those with better scanners will have advantage - it could be yours - as I say - MORE SAND IN THE BOX. What ki...
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.29 22:29:00
|
32. Planetary conquest in legion - in General Discussions [original thread]
+1 for 1 and 2. Districts attack and defence must work as POSes - you can attack them everytime you want - they can have drones for defence if owner invest in it like the POS shoot with weapons if its owner anchor and online them - it is logical. ...
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.29 21:48:00
|
33. Legion beta-testers - in General Discussions [original thread]
EVE - 5 years DUST 514 - 2 years
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.29 21:41:00
|
34. {REQUEST} - BOMBS FOR DROPSHIPS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Or may be yours? Something that make 10k damage and kill everything in its range + you cannot see it is not OP, but something that malfunction your caterpilar without killing you and you can see it long before it reach you is OP. Please enlighte...
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.29 21:37:00
|
35. {REQUEST} - BOMBS FOR DROPSHIPS - in General Discussions [original thread]
And I really try explain myself how OB is not at all OP, and CATERPILLAR bomb ( destroy caterpillar of the tank and stop him. Can be fixed by remote repair for at least 10 seconds ) is. Well, I can't
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.29 10:18:00
|
36. {REQUEST} - BOMBS FOR DROPSHIPS - in General Discussions [original thread]
It will be nice to hear from a dev what CCP think about it.....
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.29 10:12:00
|
37. {REQUEST} - BOMBS FOR DROPSHIPS - in General Discussions [original thread]
It start looking like nice troll but aniway I shall answer I know exactly what I post, because I am an eve player too and I had use all kind of bombs Read this Lockbreaker Bomb - Emits random electronic bursts which have a chance of momentari...
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.28 20:29:00
|
38. {REQUEST} - BOMBS FOR DROPSHIPS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Oh, and I forgot, there are already ewar bombs in EVE ONLINE and people use it check it https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Item_Database:Ammunition_&_Charges:Bombs
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.28 19:23:00
|
39. {REQUEST} - BOMBS FOR DROPSHIPS - in General Discussions [original thread]
1: you better read some military history before declare that 2: you can say similar for cloacking :)
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.28 19:21:00
|
40. {REQUEST} - BOMBS FOR DROPSHIPS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dauth Jenkins wrote: -1, because then the sky would be even more crowded then it is now. Dropships are meant for support, even the assault variant. If we get a gunship specifically meant for offence, then I'm all for bombs. Also, aiming a pytho...
- by Bat Shard0 - at 2014.05.28 18:59:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |