Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
161. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
XeroTheBigBoss wrote: Lol! You really should get a better source I have never even fought Dust University I give you props for making up something as funny as this. Fact of the matter is that you rang and lost a good amount you rings. SI ma...
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 04:02:00
|
162. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
ALM1GHTY B44L R00 wrote: You don't need the alliance tag to be a part of an alliance. So how can you transfer clones between alliance members. Are you suggesting that one corp be able to sell their clones to another corp for ISK?
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 04:01:00
|
163. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
ALM1GHTY B44L R00 wrote: Define "balanced." As far as I'm concerned, it's balanced because everyone is given the same opportunity to create/join an alliance. Unfortunately no. The only way you can create an alliance is in Eve. Dust does no...
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 03:46:00
|
164. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
XeroTheBigBoss wrote: Banned OP should fall on deaf ears. CCP don't listen to nerd. Your few seconds of fame is officially over. I heard you were being paid 5 million ISK per ringer. And still you guys lost to Dust University and other cor...
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 03:43:00
|
165. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paper Cutter wrote: Inter-alliance clone transfers would be nice but since districts being attacked are locked, it won't help (unless that is rectified). This would encourage small corp alliances to become common practice. Agreed nice idea. +1
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 03:37:00
|
166. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
ALM1GHTY B44L R00 wrote: Once a district is being attacked, it doesn't matter how many other districts a corp owns, how much ISK they have, or how many players they have. A district being attacked is "locked" and can't be reinforced. A small co...
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 03:34:00
|
167. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
XeroTheBigBoss wrote: Banned From Forums wrote: XeroTheBigBoss wrote: Ya Dust is not gonna spoon feed you. Adapt or die. OK ZeroTheBigLoss! Point noted. But my mentality is not Adapt or Die;- Its Adapt and Kill. Remember this when I...
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 03:33:00
|
168. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aisha Ctarl wrote: Alliances /thread Lol. No offense but your alliance is a joke. How long do you think it will before someone like EoN or Cronos or STB or LOI or Orion Empire take over your territory?
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 03:32:00
|
169. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vyzion Eyri wrote: Once other regions open up for PC business, small corps will be able to establish their little cribs far from Molden Heath, where I assume the big corps and alliances will be battling it out. As large as a corporation is, it ...
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 03:30:00
|
170. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
WOLF T wrote: its the same in eve with smaller corps not being able to fund owning space and the pos equipment and sov units and upgrades and all that like the big corps and alliances. there is just certain parts of both eve and dust that are n...
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 03:27:00
|
171. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
XeroTheBigBoss wrote: Ya Dust is not gonna spoon feed you. Adapt or die. OK ZeroTheBigLoss! Point noted. But my mentality is not Adapt or Die;- Its Adapt and Kill. Remember this when I teabag that big 0 which is your face!
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 03:23:00
|
172. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
slypie11 wrote: What you have to realize is that many of the big corps got big by recruiting noobs. So while they may have a lot of money, they don't have a lot of skill. Take PRO for example. Yep but think about it. Is every member in PRO d...
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 03:21:00
|
173. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
Coleman Gray wrote: I don''t get why people think that because their corp aint huge or successful they feel they should be spoon fed. Not about spoonfeeding. Its about balance.
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 03:17:00
|
174. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
XeroTheBigBoss wrote: Stop acting like you care about the smaller corps. IF you really gave a damn about complete player balance and small corps a complete WIPE would be best NEVER should BETA testers get advantage over brand new players. Tha...
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 03:16:00
|
175. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
Val'herik Dorn wrote: That's the thing... in life eve any time where something is at stake the larger horde will win... It is not a bad thing really. I wish people would realize that they need to group up. More people means more funds means mo...
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 03:12:00
|
176. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vin Vicious wrote: Posting in an imp alt thread Sorry. Wrong number.
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 03:05:00
|
177. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paper Cutter wrote: From what I've gathered, parts of this game aren't supposed to be fair. Hence the HTFU and whatnot. FPS gamers are not capsulers. They wont stay if either they are constantly pub stomped or their is no content to the game...
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 03:03:00
|
178. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
Specter RND wrote: I don't think people have grasped the concept of a RPG. Played for a while = High SP ISK and Skill in general = Higher end gear You shouldn't expect hitting a lot as a new player. In RPG terms, you can't just fly into the f...
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 02:58:00
|
179. PC maybe headed for potential failure and here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
PC is designed in such a way that it favours the defender. CCP has tried to balance it out so that the attacker has to attack multiple times but there is a serious flaw in this;- smaller corps will not be able to put up the dough for this. On an ...
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.18 02:41:00
|
180. We need more contact grenades - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: /me seriously thinks the contact grenades should only go off on direct hits. But that is what he just thinks. Direct hits are fine with me. I love those guys that crouch behind an obstacle and cook a grenade for 4 seco...
- by Banned From Forums - at 2013.05.17 19:29:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |