| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 |
181. It Should Take Three - Four AVers To Take Out One Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jason Pearson wrote: I mean imagine a squad of three AVers with the following setup of weapons I'd like to see. Webifier Weapon that when fired (like a laser) can reduce the movment speed of a tank to a slow crawl, stupidly slow. A weapon tha...
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.18 00:50:00
|
182. It Should Take Three - Four AVers To Take Out One Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
R F Gyro wrote: BMSTUBBY wrote: It should also take three persons in side the tank in order for the tank to move, aim / fire, and reload its weapon. This kind of thing has been suggested fairly often, but solo tankers want to solo tank, ...
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 23:39:00
|
183. **** THIS IMBALANCED PIECE OF **** GAME!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=90846&find=unread
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 23:27:00
|
184. Would you pay all your ISK for a respec? - in General Discussions [original thread]
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=90846&find=unread
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 23:25:00
|
185. It Should Take Three - Four AVers To Take Out One Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
ALPHA DECRIPTER wrote: BMSTUBBY wrote: Tankers can make a ton of WP's if set as a Defend order and all three persons in the tank make extra WP's with any WP action gained. Was in a two-man squad and called in 3 OBs. How? With a tank of ...
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 23:23:00
|
186. It Should Take Three - Four AVers To Take Out One Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Protocake JR wrote: BMSTUBBY wrote: Protocake JR wrote: Forced teamwork is not fun. It's okay reward players who use teamwork, but to force them is a bad game mechanic. Someone will fall short of their duty (or even fail to show up at all...
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 23:23:00
|
187. It Should Take Three - Four AVers To Take Out One Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: BMSTUBBY wrote: Kiss Keep it simple stupid$ Stupid sales, I've sat through that presentation one too many times Actually I learned this phrase from this man, Quote: Richard "****" Marcinko (born November 21,...
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 23:20:00
|
188. It Should Take Three - Four AVers To Take Out One Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ranger SnakeBlood wrote: Knight Soiaire wrote: Just because there aren't 3 people inside the HAV, doesn't mean the Pilot isn't using teamwork. Your squad is much better off outside your HAV, because they can take out AVers that are camped i...
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 23:12:00
|
189. It Should Take Three - Four AVers To Take Out One Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Protocake JR wrote: Forced teamwork is not fun. It's okay reward players who use teamwork, but to force them is a bad game mechanic. Someone will fall short of their duty (or even fail to show up at all). So what do you call the current AV v ...
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 23:10:00
|
190. It Should Take Three - Four AVers To Take Out One Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ld Collins wrote: BMSTUBBY wrote: It should also take three persons in side the tank in order for the tank to move, aim / fire, and reload its weapon. - Remove one person from the tank and the tank then loses its ability to reload its wea...
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 23:05:00
|
191. It Should Take Three - Four AVers To Take Out One Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: BMSTUBBY wrote: It should also take three persons in side the tank in order for the tank to move, aim / fire, and reload its weapon. - Remove one person from the tank and the tank then loses its ability to reload its ...
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 23:02:00
|
192. It Should Take Three - Four AVers To Take Out One Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fizzer94 wrote: BMSTUBBY wrote: Yoma Carrim wrote: You sir were calling for a flame war with that title weren't you? Not really, why? Think about it. Pilots are saying it should take team work in order to destroy their tanks, right? ...
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 23:01:00
|
193. It Should Take Three - Four AVers To Take Out One Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
TranquilBiscuit ofVaLoR wrote: makes sense, i suppose. or you could make tanks only effective against other vehicles, where it would be very hard to kill infantry, but still possible and vice versa. I thought about this as well but in the e...
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 22:56:00
|
194. It Should Take Three - Four AVers To Take Out One Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yoma Carrim wrote: You sir were calling for a flame war with that title weren't you? Not really, why? Think about it. Pilots are saying it should take team work in order to destroy their tanks, right? Well all I am saying is that it shoul...
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 22:54:00
|
195. It Should Take Three - Four AVers To Take Out One Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
It should also take three persons in side the tank in order for the tank to move, aim / fire, and reload its weapon. - Remove one person from the tank and the tank then loses its ability to reload its weapons - Remove two persons from the tan...
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 22:48:00
|
196. Let's fix the Flaylock - in General Discussions [original thread]
Right now I prefer my Toxin over my Proto Flaylocks. 100 rounds puts Fatties down quick in CQC. I do wish they would see some love back.
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 21:37:00
|
197. HMG hotfix tomorrow? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ummmm they are going to do this, Quote: Improved HMG effectiveness at short/medium range.
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 21:30:00
|
198. 20 mill sp player "Me" thinks this game is broken - in General Discussions [original thread]
Meknow Intaki wrote: It seams kind of fooked that I have to switch into the new gun class to stay competitive in dust... Better off training into tanks Working as intended. CCP makes OP FOTM weapons, uber l33t tryhards buy boosters in or...
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 21:28:00
|
199. Blanket Answers To All Your QQ's - in General Discussions [original thread]
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote: You forgot Mintchip's response: Me luvs ya baby, lick! Hummmm, must have missed it. * Goes to search tab to try and find it. *
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 13:16:00
|
200. Blanket Answers To All Your QQ's - in General Discussions [original thread]
New one added. - Deployment cancelled due to technical issues that we encountered.
- by BMSTUBBY - at 2013.12.17 11:35:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |