| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 |
13381. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Eskel Bondfree wrote: That's some exhaustive work on the matter OP, thanks for that. I completely agree that armor tanking needs to be brought in line with shield tanking. Still I'd like to add some points I think you missed in your write up an...
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.30 22:25:00
|
13382. What joke fits do you tend to run for the lolz? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shove a load of kinetic catalyzers on and run about with a plasma cannon.
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.30 21:52:00
|
13383. Give DUSTers Respec Or Give DUST Death - in General Discussions [original thread]
Waaaa, I want a respec every time I feel like it!
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.30 19:04:00
|
13384. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Torr Wrath wrote: I wish i had the time to reas every single post and page in this thread, as it stands i have got the first page completed and I must say that I am in complete support to the OP save where he specified galentte instead of galen...
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.30 19:03:00
|
13385. When shield recharge delay is fixed, armour will reign supreme - in General Discussions [original thread]
You must be joking. Has your head suffered serious trauma in the past or are you trolling?
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.30 17:02:00
|
13386. CCP, revert the HP buff of LAV's - in General Discussions [original thread]
On free LAVs, at least. There really wasn't a problem with how those ones were before.
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.30 00:05:00
|
13387. Countdown to 1.2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Princeps Marcellus wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Source? Quote: Deployment date: July 2nd 2013 - Dev Blog Uprising 1.2 Patch Notes: Appreciated, thanks.
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.30 00:04:00
|
13388. Question Time With Rag! (CCP your invited) - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Nullarbor wrote: RagnaroK Ignite wrote: 3.Are you guys considering to set a tax tool to corps leaders that automatically charge corp members with a percentage of their earning but not touching the mercs personal wallets? Yes. I don't...
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.29 23:43:00
|
13389. Feeling guilty about owning newberries in battle. - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Nullarbor wrote: I am currently rewriting the matchmaking engine entirely since the current implementation is not delivering the results we need. We havn't scheduled a release date yet but we will be keen to get this out as soon as it is re...
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.29 23:22:00
|
13390. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DRDEEZENUTSZ TWOpointo wrote: I think it will be a bad idea for armor repairs to be in a high slot cause that will hurt armarr dual tanking abilities cause then they have to choose between extenders or armor repair which will make them worse th...
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.29 22:20:00
|
13391. [Feedback] Is the flaylock OP vs to other sidearms? NOPE (math, numbers, & l... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ease of aiming, hitting and general use is a serious plus for the flaylock. In your number sets, the scrambler pistol does beat the flaylock, IF it lands all of its shots solidly. If it misses even one, then the flaylock outdamages it - and it eve...
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.29 22:13:00
|
13392. Countdown to 1.2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Source?
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.29 22:01:00
|
13393. Scout suits, are they worth it or not. - in General Discussions [original thread]
They're dead.
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.29 22:00:00
|
13394. [Request] Reduce Dropsuit Electronics/Engineering to x3 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'm really not sure why they were increased from 1x skills to 5x skills. 5 times the amount of SP investment for the same effect is a huge SP sink, especially for core skills which everyone basically needs to have.
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.29 21:53:00
|
13395. To CCP: My idea of Devs showing off - in General Discussions [original thread]
GATQS wrote: -Also Devs should give you 10 copy's of either Fighter Jets or Black OPS HAV's if you successfully 360 quick scope head shot last kill them while they're riding a dropship.
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.29 21:50:00
|
13396. The biggest threat to a heavy - in General Discussions [original thread]
LAVs are a problem for suits in general. Even a couple can wreak havoc - even if they don't get kills, people having to avoid them presents a serious problem for moving around.
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.29 13:26:00
|
13397. Sooooo... - in General Discussions [original thread]
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.29 13:12:00
|
13398. [Suggestion]To reduce HP modules and Damage mods spam - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I think basing HP modules more around powergrid consumption and utility modules more around CPU consumption would be a more elegant solution to this problem. Your suggestions would also make people never use HP modules.
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.29 13:06:00
|
13399. The 'QQ Flaylock is killing me threads' - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't think the flaylock is a problem just because armour is weak - I find it very easy to break even a caldari logistics suit with a flaylock.
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.29 13:01:00
|
13400. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The section on dual tanking will be up soon(tm).
- by Arkena Wyrnspire - at 2013.06.29 12:44:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |