DUST Search - [Feedback] How I think WP should go.

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

[Feedback] How I think WP should go.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Spycrab Potato Hold-Your-Fire 184	Posted - 2013.08.05 15:53:00 - [1] - Quote We should get at the very least something for everything. Here are some numbers I thought up for things we don't currently have WP for. Back-hacking: 75 WP Scanned enemy that isn't already scanned: 3 WP each Scanned Enemy you scanned dies by player on team: 10 WP each Mobile CRU spawns player: 25 WP each Enemy Equipment Destroyed: 15 WP Enemy Vehicle Hacked: 25 WP That's all I could think of, if anyone has anything else to put in I will add it.
Arkena Wyrnspire Turalyon 514 2358	Posted - 2013.08.05 16:13:00 - [2] - Quote Vehicle hacking is kind of open to abuse - you could have a couple of guys in the hills with codebreakers hacking a pair of LAVs back and forth and ending up with huge WP.
ALPHA DECRIPTER M.E.R.C. Conventional Forces D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 224	Posted - 2013.08.05 16:59:00 - [3] - Quote Back-hacking: yes Scanner related: CCP is planning to put this in 1.4 but scanner will only work for squad. MCRU: less WP as an LLAV is hard as hell to take out compared to uplinks and there is no spawn limit. But yes give them WP. Counter Equipment: YESSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!! Hack vehicle: YES! `Sigh. Just another fun game of DUST .
Oso Peresoso RisingSuns 532	Posted - 2013.08.05 17:00:00 - [4] - Quote Spycrab Potato wrote: We should get at the very least something for everything. Here are some numbers I thought up for things we don't currently have WP for. Back-hacking: 75 WP Scanned enemy that isn't already scanned: 3 WP each Scanned Enemy you scanned dies by player on team: 10 WP each Mobile CRU spawns player: 25 WP each Enemy Equipment Destroyed: 15 WP Enemy Vehicle Hacked: 25 WP That's all I could think of, if anyone has anything else to put in I will add it. Scanning people that don't die... I would have suggested zero, but 3 is low enough. Definite NO to vehicle hacking.. and equipment at 10 or 15.
Aikuchi Tomaru Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 170	Posted - 2013.08.05 17:30:00 - [5] - Quote Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Vehicle hacking is kind of open to abuse - you could have a couple of guys in the hills with codebreakers hacking a pair of LAVs back and forth and ending up with huge WP. They could make it so that every player can only get SP for hacking the same vehicle once. So you wouldn't get SP for backhacking a vehicle, if you hacked it in the first place.
ALPHA DECRIPTER M.E.R.C. Conventional Forces D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 225	Posted - 2013.08.05 17:34:00 - [6] - Quote Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Vehicle hacking is kind of open to abuse - you could have a couple of guys in the hills with codebreakers hacking a pair of LAVs back and forth and ending up with huge WP. They could make it so that every player can only get SP for hacking the same vehicle once. So you wouldn't get SP for backhacking a vehicle, if you hacked it in the first place. Good point arkena and good salution Aikuchi. And neither of you raged... why can't all topics be this civil? Question. Should you get SP for destroying a hacked vehicle? I mean, you ARE wrecking another teammates ride which is costing them big bucks. `Sigh. Just another fun game of DUST .
Arkena Wyrnspire Turalyon 514 2360	Posted - 2013.08.05 17:37:00 - [7] - Quote Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Vehicle hacking is kind of open to abuse - you could have a couple of guys in the hills with codebreakers hacking a pair of LAVs back and forth and ending up with huge WP. They could make it so that every player can only get SP for hacking the same vehicle once. So you wouldn't get SP for backhacking a vehicle, if you hacked it in the first place. Yep, that would work perfectly.
Spycrab Potato Hold-Your-Fire 185	Posted - 2013.08.05 19:23:00 - [8] - Quote OK, I edited the values to reflect the feed back you guys gave. How about now?
DRDEEZE TWO POINTO DEEZE NUTSZ INC 80	Posted - 2013.08.05 20:27:00 - [9] - Quote I also think you should add triage bonous for vehicles something like 25 wp per 250 armor or 200 shields repaired
CAELAN Andoril Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic 56	Posted - 2013.08.05 21:45:00 - [10] - Quote I'd say lower equipment to 5 WP a piece. While some matches equipment is scarce, matches with players who know what they're doing has equipment literally littered on the landscape. Also, with more WP gains, you'd probably have to increase the Precision Strike requirement. But other than that, it looks good.

Spycrab Potato Hold-Your-Fire 185	Posted - 2013.08.05 21:49:00 - [11] - Quote Edited again, anyone else have something to add?
Spycrab Potato Hold-Your-Fire 188	Posted - 2013.08.06 17:02:00 - [12] - Quote Bumpity Bump. CCP, would you like to add some insight?


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.