|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1674
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 05:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
Listen to this guy....he wants EoN to break up yet he claims to be in the alliance. How lol is that? That means that you are a part of the problem. If you are in EoN (obviously he isn't), then practice what you preach and leave.
Check his logic though....read his post listed as #5 in the OP. EoN and PRO are the same...PRO formed a big clan and EoN formed a big alliance. Out of all of the major alliances, EoN was the smallest.
Anyway, there's no need to continue. Dude finished himself with the ridiculous statements that he made. We all should just let this lolthread die. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1683
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 22:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:Rogatien Merc wrote:HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:Rogatien Merc wrote:Your facts are ... debatable. Not by EoN they are not. Your judgement is clouded by the fact you hold the Tag and you think just because som1 does not hold said tag they are not relevant. Which is sad on your part and just adds to your very large "Debatable" Egos. Weeeeellll... then your judgement is clouded because you are NOT in EoN. and view everyone in EoN. as an egotistical evil boogy monster. See how that argument goes both ways? "you think just because som1 does not hold said tag they are not relevant." Beyond the obvious that inspires, ACTually, *you* are the one who says that people outside EoN. are not relevant when you say things like the only thing that will fix PC is EoN. dissolving. I see most EoN bros on the forums calling for someone to come attack us. We believe in you bro, even if you don't. Apparently you dont know how to read like your buddies, I am in EoN. You just cant see past your egos that some of us respectable corps actually want change and the ignorance to stop. Spin it anyway you want, you boys here in these forums fall short of the brain capacity to look at the big picture. Sad day for you boys.
So, then why don't your respectable corp just leave EoN then since Eon is the problem?? |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1686
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 00:22:00 -
[3] - Quote
HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote: EoN leadership tried playing the politics and meta gaming roles here with there PR BS. Now that that vulnerability has been exploited (META/Politics) and there starting to look bad, they now want us to Take it to PC (The FPS) Portion of the game. Not this time, thats giving them home field advantage. Here in 2 out of 3 aspects of the game, they are weak. So why give them the advantage now after everything they have done?
Listen to this guy.....who cares about the meta, lmao??
I didn't know that the meta game was so serious. That is why he is going so hard with this nonsense. He is seriously trying to win a forum war..omg I can't stop laughing lol |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1688
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 00:39:00 -
[4] - Quote
HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:Som1 is a dust noob Dust has 3 aspects, FPS, Politics, Meta. EoN has been feeding there political/Meta BS PR crap since PC started, Now that they are being eatin alive, you've all flipped the switch saying oh attack us blablabla.
And he continues to make me laugh lol...I swear I haven't had so much fun reading since this guy here. Because it seems like he is dead serious and that's the real punch line.
hahaha...I'm laughing as I'm typing..ohh man. Because he is really here trying to win some cold war meta game lmao. He must have been preparing for this war too and decided to launch the meta game attack when he felt ready lol.
Edit: ...in an fps, at thathahaha |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1689
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 01:13:00 -
[5] - Quote
HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:Exergonic wrote:Anyone who believes there is meta in dust is off their rocker...
Just something for people who aren't good at the game to feel liked and/or wanted. Keep feeling like anyone even cares about you blip
Ps when you grow a *** sack post on your main and we can hash this out in my new thunderdome :-)... See you then scrub GOML noob lol refer to post #94, more threats to thumb wiggle a guy to death eh? lmao, I wonder how many people are enjoying your chest beating nonsense. EDIT: Forum hero eh? I've had most of you riding my nuts all day whats that say about you tough guy?
Uh oh, chalk one up for his side of the meta war, Exer lol.
Where is the Info Broker? Are you keeping track of this meta war?? |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1690
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 04:14:00 -
[6] - Quote
HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:I dont need your life story kid, some of us are prior military with wives, kids, and lives. What do you have? What have you done with your life? Practiced playing shooter games? Got a basement to yourself were you practice wiggling your thumbs and call yourself a soldier? Get good nub.
No way are you older than 15 |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1690
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 04:19:00 -
[7] - Quote
HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:Meta war? If thats what this is you guys suck at it. This was to destroy you and turn the masses against you, kind of like ancient rome. The mob is fickle. Ive succeded at 1/2 the job and planted the thoughts and hate needed to finish the job. It may take time, but it can be done
ok, community hates EoN...now what?
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1702
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 21:22:00 -
[8] - Quote
Roy Ventus wrote:HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:Roy Ventus wrote:Everybody complains about Eon and TP but do nothing about them...I thought this was New Eden. What da hell you think this is for You've done your part, but what about the others? All I see is finger pointing from everyone else, so far.
What has he done though? Has he organized any launches yet? |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1702
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 21:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:Yea I agree lol, but as I said making an alliance big enough to take on 15 corps would be more of a headache then its worth, its easier to just to create pure boredem then deal with a 20-30 corp alliance. Even if we did do it it would make us no better than them.. So yea.. That is the problem. If CCP made a maximum of 5 corps per alliance they would have been dead a long time ago.
Who are these 15 corps that you speak of? |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1702
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 23:26:00 -
[10] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:Yea I agree lol, but as I said making an alliance big enough to take on 15 corps would be more of a headache then its worth, its easier to just to create pure boredem then deal with a 20-30 corp alliance. Even if we did do it it would make us no better than them.. So yea.. That is the problem. If CCP made a maximum of 5 corps per alliance they would have been dead a long time ago. Who are these 15 corps that you speak of?
Not to mention that you don't need to create an alliance.....just everyone agree to attack the same organization. Create a channel for everyone to join if you need ringers. Very simple |
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1702
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 23:58:00 -
[11] - Quote
HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:Yea I agree lol, but as I said making an alliance big enough to take on 15 corps would be more of a headache then its worth, its easier to just to create pure boredem then deal with a 20-30 corp alliance. Even if we did do it it would make us no better than them.. So yea.. That is the problem. If CCP made a maximum of 5 corps per alliance they would have been dead a long time ago. Who are these 15 corps that you speak of? Not to mention that you don't need to create an alliance.....just everyone agree to attack the same organization. Create a channel for everyone to join if you need ringers. Very simple No offense but you realize how much it would take to organize that crap Not worth it IMO If som1 else wants to do it. eh. More power to them. The 1 huge down fall of an alliance, when 1 corp goes to sh*t or f*cks up, Everything just starts goin downhill. I'll pass.
With all of the energy that you've used typing up thread after thread, you could have organized it already. There needs no organization...I'll tell you how simple it would be.
You: "Everyone let's just attack all of EoN's districts. Community: "Ok...hell yeah, let's do it." You: "I'll create the channel called "The Resistance"..just join if you need ringers".
You: created the channel The Resistance: Community joins
Then everyone just launch attacks, it's really that simple. Of course, getting people to actually launch attacks on EoN will be the thing to do. But there is no need for going into Eve and creating the alliance and accepting all of the corps or creating a website, etc, etc. Just everyone agrees to attack and that's it. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1703
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 01:09:00 -
[12] - Quote
HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:
Lead the charge then sir. I'm not gonna be the 1 to give EoN an excuse to make that big blue donut BIGGER.
I'm in EoN...why would I lead the charge? |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1704
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 01:56:00 -
[13] - Quote
HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:
Lead the charge then sir. I'm not gonna be the 1 to give EoN an excuse to make that big blue donut BIGGER.
I'm in EoN...why would I lead the charge? You just joined eon lol, AND because we arent dealing with real life military veterans here. Were are dealing with a bunch of nerds and broken down men here, as soon as the movement starts everyone will run to EoN for easy mode. THEN that donut will just grow and grow and grow. So if you want it done lead the charge. Very few of us are military vets with balls. The rest however, as i said, want easy mode.
What do I want done? I'm giving you guys very practical suggestions and solutions to your issues with EoN. Instead of just complaining about EoN on the forums, try and get rid of EoN.
I mean, isn't that what you are doing? You are leading a crusade to turn the community against EoN. Ok, so let's say that you have succeeded....what happens now? |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1704
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 02:50:00 -
[14] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:
Lead the charge then sir. I'm not gonna be the 1 to give EoN an excuse to make that big blue donut BIGGER.
I'm in EoN...why would I lead the charge? You just joined eon lol, AND because we arent dealing with real life military veterans here. Were are dealing with a bunch of nerds and broken down men here, as soon as the movement starts everyone will run to EoN for easy mode. THEN that donut will just grow and grow and grow. So if you want it done lead the charge. Very few of us are military vets with balls. The rest however, as i said, want easy mode. What do I want done? I'm giving you guys very practical suggestions and solutions to your issues with EoN. Instead of just complaining about EoN on the forums, try and get rid of EoN. I mean, isn't that what you are doing? You are leading a crusade to turn the community against EoN. Ok, so let's say that you have succeeded....what happens now? Then someone else becomes EoN. There needs to be plenty of factions(Corps/Alliances) able to challenge each other and there are, but PC is broke (CCP's fault) and no one wants to fight.
If there becomes another EoN, then that would be great because I doubt that EoN would tap out unless players just got bored with the game.
I don't understand it when people say PC is broke. What were guys expecting out of PC? You attack territory, you hold it, and you fight to defend it. What is missing out of PC? Maybe this deserves its own thread. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1705
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 03:11:00 -
[15] - Quote
HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:Considering EoN is farming the districts, No1 else has the funds to wage war even if they wanted too. EoN has the funds but no1 to attack and your still asking whats broke?
How is that CCP's fault? People were saying it was broke before EoN became the dominant alliance. If noone has funds to launch an attack, then that is each corp's fault. What do you think corps were doing prior to PC, in preparation of it? |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1705
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 03:18:00 -
[16] - Quote
Canari Elphus wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:
If there becomes another EoN, then that would be great because I doubt that EoN would tap out unless players just got bored with the game.
I don't understand it when people say PC is broke. What were guys expecting out of PC? You attack territory, you hold it, and you fight to defend it. What is missing out of PC? Maybe this deserves its own thread.
dubbs, come on man. You actually believe that the mechanics CCP put in place actually make PC interesting? They took corp battles and bobby pinned a map to it. The so called DUST/EVE link was nothing more than a fancy rainbow OB that bored the EVE folks to tears within a week or two. Things that CCP never took into account - How do we make the matches feel like there is a sense of attack and a sense of defending? How do you immerse players in the game? - How do we make sure that one talented team/alliance does not run the table and spell the end of PC until they get bored and leave or the game goes down the tube (not mutually exclusive) This was nothing more than a rush job by CCP to launch the game while hoping and praying that it would succeed.
What do you think could have made PC interesting? Because maybe I am just missing what guys are or were looking for, as far as PC is concerned.
Besides being able to provide orbitals from space, what more were you guys expecting from a Dust/Eve link? The only mechanic that can prevent an alliance from controlling MH is if battles did not allow for ringers. Other than that, you can't blame CCP for one corp being able to dominate another corp. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1706
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 03:21:00 -
[17] - Quote
HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:HARDFACTS DUSTTRUTH wrote:Considering EoN is farming the districts, No1 else has the funds to wage war even if they wanted too. EoN has the funds but no1 to attack and your still asking whats broke? How is that CCP's fault? People were saying it was broke before EoN became the dominant alliance I didnt say it was CCP's fault, thats EoN's fault. They kick everyone off the map, control the map so no1 other than them can raise money, then wonder why there is no1 left to fight.. This is just turning into a round and round and im not even trying to rant on EoN this time
Well, when you say PC is broke...that implies that it is the dev's fault. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1707
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 03:59:00 -
[18] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote: If there becomes another EoN, then that would be great because I doubt that EoN would tap out unless players just got bored with the game.
I don't understand it when people say PC is broke. What were guys expecting out of PC? You attack territory, you hold it, and you fight to defend it. What is missing out of PC? Maybe this deserves its own thread.
I agree EoN has Solidarity, which is an admirable trait. on the subject of PC being broke, all these matches are just skirmishes, not even skirmish 1.0 which gives a semblance of attack and defend. But I'll need to write a much longer thread and I run a corp on my alt and they're having a corp meeting early in the morning. Here's the short version lets say ML attacks RND in the new system of PC RND will have the ability to store 400 clones on their district 500 if it's the type of district that can hold more clones. no reinforcments for the first round, no timers either. ML can attack at any time with up to 3 clone packs so 360 clones. ML attacks at Noon there is 30 mins before the match starts so the first battle happens at 12:30 PM The First BattleSkirmish 1.0 match Attacker Victory means there is 2nd battle Defender Victory means Attackers are stopped Defenders gain 50% of clones left attackers keep 20% the rest are destroyed. Assuming the Attackers win there is a 12 hour timer that starts til the next battle Defenders can reinforce with 120 clones as can attackers but neither side can exceed their clone limit (360 for attackers or 400/500 for defenders) Match 2 starts at 12:30 AM The Second BattleDomination/Skirmish 2.0 Attacker Victory by clones means the district flips Attacker MCC victory means defenders lose 50% of clones for the third battle Defender Clone Victory District Attack Ends Defender MCC victory attackers lose 50% of clones No reinforcements for this battle Battle 3 starts in 6 hours or 6:30 AM in this example [uThird Battle[/u] Ambush OMS Attacker Wins Clone out District Flips Attacker Wins Time runs out Defender loses all of their clones defender gains 75% of them the other 25% are destoyed; District Flips Defender Wins Clone out District Stays the same Defender Wins Time runs out Attacker loses all of their clones defender gains 75% of them the other 25% are destoyed; District stays in the Defenders hands the winner will have the threat of an immediate counter attack, sucks but hey, it will be a true pissing contest.
See, I don't agree with your scenario. I love the fact that you have 24 hours to prepare. With no reinforcement timer and no android app to alert me of a battle....how could I defend my districts all the time? It would only be great for guys who really don't have anything going on.
Plus, ambush sucks for a clan battle. And although you have added different game modes and such, pc would essentially still be the same. Which would be corp battles for districts. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1707
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 04:14:00 -
[19] - Quote
Canari Elphus wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Canari Elphus wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:
If there becomes another EoN, then that would be great because I doubt that EoN would tap out unless players just got bored with the game.
I don't understand it when people say PC is broke. What were guys expecting out of PC? You attack territory, you hold it, and you fight to defend it. What is missing out of PC? Maybe this deserves its own thread.
dubbs, come on man. You actually believe that the mechanics CCP put in place actually make PC interesting? They took corp battles and bobby pinned a map to it. The so called DUST/EVE link was nothing more than a fancy rainbow OB that bored the EVE folks to tears within a week or two. Things that CCP never took into account - How do we make the matches feel like there is a sense of attack and a sense of defending? How do you immerse players in the game? - How do we make sure that one talented team/alliance does not run the table and spell the end of PC until they get bored and leave or the game goes down the tube (not mutually exclusive) This was nothing more than a rush job by CCP to launch the game while hoping and praying that it would succeed. What do you think could have made PC interesting? Because maybe I am just missing what guys are or were looking for, as far as PC is concerned. Besides being able to provide orbitals from space, what more were you guys expecting from a Dust/Eve link? The only mechanic that can prevent an alliance from controlling MH is if battles did not allow for ringers. Other than that, you can't blame CCP for one corp being able to dominate another corp. As far as defense and attack goes....sure, CCP can implement skirmish 1.0 as the sole game mode for PC battles. But not having skirmish 1.0 isn't a make or break thing for PC. My personal opinion of what could have made this more interesting would be. 1 - As you said, having Skirmish 1.0 as the game mode for PC. You have defenders and an invading force. 2 - Dont have the clones magically appear on a planet district. That they are transported through EVE space and can be attacked/defended by EVE ships. That would make having EVE support very valuable to the game. It would also give a sense of front lines where the further the ships need to push, the better the chance for them being attacked or not make it at all. 3 - Have some real value to the EVE folks (no clue what that is because Im not an EVE player) 4 - Have the ability to use attrition as a viable tactic. That would be something that would give the game a new dimension and actually make it feel like warfare. Sometimes in real life numbers and/or money truly do beat skill. This is an idea I had had previously - https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1094269#post1094269I dont have the magic solution for all of this and I have no background in game design but what I do know is that PC has no depth to it nor does it have any feel of battle/war beyond a small pitched fight. Scramble onto the field, scramble to the next objective and then play ring around the rosie until someone wins.
Suggestions 2&3 are just giving value to Eve pilots. Not sure how that would change how dusters, on the ground, enjoy pc. Personally, I don't like the idea of players in Eve having a much bigger impact on Dust than Dust would on Eve. If Eve is going to have a major impact on wars in Dust, then it should be reciprocated....Dust should have a major impact on Eve.
Suggestion #4 would then just create another set of QQs. Because instead of fps skill, success will be determined by how large your corp is...and you have to see a problem with that.
I don't know....sure, PC could be better but in comparison to other games, it's still better because at least you're battling for ownership and not just bragging rights (and I'm not talking gameplay...just concept). |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1707
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 05:04:00 -
[20] - Quote
IgniteableAura wrote:It's all about the clones. Many clones die every day in eve.....that's the link. Have costs associated with clones.
Corps can already Zerg their way to districts....corps can only defend so many districts at once.
Eve/dust link needs have impact or this game fails. There is no reason you should get orbitals in PC without eve support. Also shouldn't be linked to wp totals. How you balance that......I donno. Perhaps have cool down timers based on number pilots above the planet. Have the eve pilots "grind" for an orbital. Orbit a beacon or kill a specific number of rats....etc.
Eve pilots shouldn't be able to just bombard the dust field with strikes though. I'm satisfied with the fact that you have to earn it.....If we can't get orbitals without eve support then that still places Eve on a higher pedestal than Dust. Because then, every corp in pc will need to have eve backing. At the same time, eve won't need dust backing....I'm not comfortable with that.
None of these, however, will dramatically increase the pc experience. |
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1707
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 05:10:00 -
[21] - Quote
Canari Elphus wrote:I get what you are saying
- for us to impact EVE we need to have something they want. A crucial part of their game that ground pounders control. I don't know what that would be since I'm not a player - I wouldn't want corps to just be able to no-talent Zerg however there should be room for diversity of tactics. To have a strategy that extends beyond the match itself
I do agree that corps with less skill should be able to survive in pc. I believe, that without the ringer mechanic, this could be possible. So, let's say a corp of Delta Force size (well, before they lost members) was in pc. They would be able to hold more districts than a smaller and more skilled corp. If that smaller corp went to war with DF, they may win some battles and even take districts. But they wouldn't be able to take all of Delta Force's districts because they wouldn't be able to field enough people from their corp to make all of their timers if DF launched a massive offensive.
The smaller corp wouldn't be able to use ringers so the amount of districts that they hold will be dependent on their numbers. So, a smaller more skillful corp may only have three districts or so but they wouldn't be able to go to war with a large corp because of the sheer numbers of the larger corp. The larger corp may be able to hold 12, 15 districts or so and once at war, the larger corp can attack their districts...thus tying them up. The smaller corp may even be able to take a district or two but they won't be able to dent the larger corp because they wouldn't have the numbers. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1715
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 23:36:00 -
[22] - Quote
Canari Elphus wrote:To make the two games matter to each other should be somewhat simple if CCP could actually put in the time and effort to work on the mechanics of it.
DUST mercs control districts that produce things that EVE pilots need EVE pilots control the off planet actions (transport, defending against incursions etc) which DUST mercs need to get around
Like it or not, having something like this would be the only way to really mesh the games together. If you dont have a true link then DUST is just another FPS game with a cool marketing story.
I am for a more meaningful link between dust & eve. But it has to be mutual. Eve pilots already feel like dusters are beneath them. I would want eve pilots to need dusters just as much as dusters to need eve pilots. That would require an update for both games, I presume.
If eve NEEDED dust corps, then I can envision an increase in playerbase as eve corps will have to have dusters on the ground takincg care of their needs and assets.
|
|
|
|