What faulty logic is that?

Insanity is never sad.

Unless its the depressive kind of insanity. The kind where people paint pictures of sad clowns.

That's kind of sad.




So you're saying im popular and intelligent?

Thanks!

If there becomes another EoN, then that would be great because I doubt that EoN would tap out unless players just got bored with the game.

I don't understand it when people say PC is broke. What were guys expecting out of PC? You attack territory, you hold it, and you fight to defend it. What is missing out of PC? Maybe this deserves its own thread.

What do you think could have made PC interesting? Because maybe I am just missing what guys are or were looking for, as far as PC is concerned.

Besides being able to provide orbitals from space, what more were you guys expecting from a Dust/Eve link? The only mechanic that can prevent an alliance from controlling MH is if battles did not allow for ringers. Other than that, you can't blame CCP for one corp being able to dominate another corp.

As far as defense and attack goes....sure, CCP can implement skirmish 1.0 as the sole game mode for PC battles. But not having skirmish 1.0 isn't a make or break thing for PC.

Im waiting for some people to return so we can rebuild our IMPire

I do agree that corps with less skill should be able to survive in pc. I believe, that without the ringer mechanic, this could be possible. So, let's say a corp of Delta Force size (well, before they lost members) was in pc. They would be able to hold more districts than a smaller and more skilled corp. If that smaller corp went to war with DF, they may win some battles and even take districts. But they wouldn't be able to take all of Delta Force's districts because they wouldn't be able to field enough people from their corp to make all of their timers if DF launched a massive offensive.

The smaller corp wouldn't be able to use ringers so the amount of districts that they hold will be dependent on their numbers. So, a smaller more skillful corp may only have three districts or so but they wouldn't be able to go to war with a large corp because of the sheer numbers of the larger corp. The larger corp may be able to hold 12, 15 districts or so and once at war, the larger corp can attack their districts...thus tying them up. The smaller corp may even be able to take a district or two but they won't be able to dent the larger corp because they wouldn't have the numbers.

Thread got derailed into something actually worthwhile. Sucks. :/

And we have finally come full circle.

I am for a more meaningful link between dust & eve. But it has to be mutual. Eve pilots already feel like dusters are beneath them. I would want eve pilots to need dusters just as much as dusters to need eve pilots. That would require an update for both games, I presume.

If eve NEEDED dust corps, then I can envision an increase in playerbase as eve corps will have to have dusters on the ground takincg care of their needs and assets.