|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
2808
   |
Posted - 2013.08.01 21:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
Aizen Intiki wrote:No, I don't want it nerfed, I don't want it to hover over me and drop bombs without a way to fend for myself. Sush.
Hell, I want that idea burned at the ******* stake.
So, what, we're gonna make yet another Dropship variant and we have no word on fixing the current ones or on any other aircraft besides an endless procession of Dropship variants? Or any mention of how pilots specced into the current ones are supposed to earn SP and ISK?
As someone who was hoping to spec into Fighters, Ace Combat Infinity is looking better and better. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
2809
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 21:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Community: "GIVE US MORE CONTENT"
CCP: Working on it.
*CCP adds a couple of values to game*
Community: "WTF CCP STOP ADDING CONTENT"
CCP: wut
For me, I just want to see people that use the current aircraft actually given something for it, rather than adding more aircraft while the issues with ISK efficiency and WP gain remain un-addressed.
Also, like I've posted before, I don't like the idea of something that can sit still in the air having the ability to deploy bombs. I think that would be better applied to Fighters, where you have to properly line up your release to do any damage, rather than just hovering over a target and spamming R1. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
2811
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 22:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
Aizen Intiki wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Community: "GIVE US MORE CONTENT"
CCP: Working on it.
*CCP adds a couple of values to game*
Community: "WTF CCP STOP ADDING CONTENT"
CCP: wut For me, I just want to see people that use the current aircraft actually given something for it, rather than adding more aircraft while the issues with ISK efficiency and WP gain remain un-addressed. Also, like I've posted before, I don't like the idea of something that can sit still in the air having the ability to deploy bombs. I think that would be better applied to Fighters, where you have to properly line up your release to do any damage, rather than just hovering over a target and spamming R1. I always liked you Moby, this is why 
I want aircraft to be a threat on the battlefield.
What I don't want is for them to be the bane of everyone's existence due to cheap mechanics. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
2812
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 22:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
Celeste Cyra wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Aizen Intiki wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Blah eve side data base dump ><
You guys do realize that there have been things on that list since like... forever. Hehe, you know that most people can't get it Dust side without knowing something, or finding a particular tool, right? Besides, all the stuff I'm talking about I've never seen on there, and I was on it about 3 weeks ago. 3 weeks doesn't equate to forever, right? This guy does the work for you http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online/inventory.php?category_id=350001 Thank you The bomber description sounds promising http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online/item.php?type_id=364378
It sounds like a mistake, is what it sounds like.
Mark my words: we'll have more vehicle complaint threads than ever before if those things go in, and anyone unfortunate enough to be specced into basic, Assault, or Logistics Dropships will still be screwed. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
2812
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 22:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
King Kobrah wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:? Sauce?
edit: *A japanese pun when asking for the source when the accent makes them sound very similar. ........................................that did not originate from japan i swear i'm going to reach through the computer and slap you silly boy
It may have come into common usage there while he was growing up. He has stated that he was born there, after all. |
|
|
| |
|