|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
zzZaXxx
The Exemplars
Top Men.
149
   |
Posted - 2013.08.01 22:25:00 -
[1] - Quote
da GAND wrote:There has to be a reason for you guys to leave that alliance
Their leadership probably wants them to be middle of the road guys in a top alliance, instead of top guys in a middle of the road alliance. They miss out on building something from the ground up, but they get to get in on more of the action I suppose. If they join EoN....well they get ISK out of it but hurt the game and look bad. Maybe they could join LOI to help them compete against EoN.
Anyways they can do whatever they want. I'm curious as to the reason too. "Independance" doesn't have many benefits other than freedom to choose an alliance that's getting more money from PC. |
zzZaXxx
The Exemplars
Top Men.
149
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 22:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
Red Dot 24601-HA wrote:da GAND wrote:There has to be a reason for you guys to leave that alliance Honestly alliance politics interfered with our ability to enjoy the game. That and maybe my resistance to authority...We disagreed on almost everything. Alliance policy, Alliance structure, PC strategy, and so on. Basically we had two very different ideas of what an "alliance" was. Now we can make our own choices, play the game our way, and not bring any backlash on them.
Wow that's a lot going on behind closed doors about a game in which your choices are squadding up for a pub match, queueing for FW, or PC. How did the two parties manage to complicate that?
And is that the royal "we"? I wonder how many corp members were consulted. |
zzZaXxx
The Exemplars
Top Men.
149
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 22:42:00 -
[3] - Quote
Red Dot 24601-HA wrote:zzZaXxx wrote:Red Dot 24601-HA wrote:da GAND wrote:There has to be a reason for you guys to leave that alliance Honestly alliance politics interfered with our ability to enjoy the game. That and maybe my resistance to authority...We disagreed on almost everything. Alliance policy, Alliance structure, PC strategy, and so on. Basically we had two very different ideas of what an "alliance" was. Now we can make our own choices, play the game our way, and not bring any backlash on them. Wow that's a lot going on behind closed doors about a game in which your choices are squadding up for a pub match, queueing for FW, or PC. How did the two parties manage to complicate that? And is that the royal "we"? I wonder how many corp members were consulted. The royal "we" includes every member that participates in our corp forum. It was unanimous that we leave. And there is actually a lot going on behind closed doors ZaX. Stuff we didn't agree on. So we left. "we" are trying to be nice about it.
heheh ok ok. /rage
If you couldn't agree on what an alliance should be, leaving was the right choice. Good luck with whatever's next. |
|
|
| |
|