|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Shotty GoBang
Pro Hic Immortalis
League of Infamy
467
   |
Posted - 2013.08.02 17:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:CCP Wolfman posted some sensor changes it may be the thing scouts need.
Source: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=97983&find=unread
I agree with CPM_Saber. The proposed TacNet change would boost a scout's ability to infiltrate and escape. Conversely, the rotation speed buffs of 1.4 will make takedown from behind a 'bit more tricky. Hard to say whether 1.4 will help or hurt Scouts should both changes be applied.
As a side note, folks are raising alot of fuss over the the proposed TacNet changes; it'll be interesting to see if CCP carries the concept forward. TacNet immunity for Scouts would satisfy both sides of this argument, though that would likely raise fuss as well.
- Shotty GoBang |
Shotty GoBang
Pro Hic Immortalis
League of Infamy
469
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 06:39:00 -
[2] - Quote
Anita Hardone wrote:So basically, OP wants a buff because the reason scouts were good before is because they are not affected by the crappy aiming issues (slow turning etc), and can take advantage of the horrid hit detection?
OP wants a buff because the Scouts are underperforming and underpowered. This fact has already been acknowledged by CCP. There's little point debating an indisputable fact, but salty tears are welcome should you care to part with more of them.
The Devs will eventually get around to us. It's only a matter of time.
- Shotty GoBang |
Shotty GoBang
Pro Hic Immortalis
League of Infamy
568
|
Posted - 2013.08.15 17:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:CCP Wolfman posted some sensor changes it may be the thing scouts need.
So what's the word from CPM, Iron Wolf Saber?
So far 1.4 looks like a big win for Heavies.
Any chance we'll be better able to sneak up on 'em?
|
Shotty GoBang
Pro Hic Immortalis
League of Infamy
574
|
Posted - 2013.08.16 03:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ludvig Enraga wrote:I tried to start a thread about CCP plans for scout a few days ago, it died w/o anyone commenting. Why should CCP care about reworking scouts if even the scout community does not care?
Hey Ludvig,
I read your thread and gave it a thumbs up, but didn't have anything to add that already hasn't been stated elsewhere. Not to say your feedback is invalid; every Scout shares your experience and sentiment. That said, there have been so many "Scouts need fixing" threads since Uprising that we're more or less just repeating ourselves in vain at this point.
I'm thinking CCP had us in mind when they rewired TacNet; let's hope they follow through with it in 1.4.
- Shotty
|
|
|
| |
|