DUST Search - Will DUST ever switch to client side hit detection?

All Channels

General Discussions

Will DUST ever switch to client side hit detection?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Anita Hardone Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire 210	Posted - 2013.08.01 03:09:00 - [1] - Quote DICE did the switch for BF3. And its been that way ever since. Just seems like with all the issues regarding it as of now, CCP might as well give it a try. Both systems have their flaws. But since the game doesnt like to put people in their own regions anyways... client side would be able to somewhat smooth things out.
Mobius Wyvern BetaMax. 2784	Posted - 2013.08.01 03:11:00 - [2] - Quote Anita Hardone wrote: DICE did the switch for BF3. And its been that way ever since. Just seems like with all the issues regarding it as of now, CCP might as well give it a try. Both systems have their flaws. But since the game doesnt like to put people in their own regions anyways... client side would be able to somewhat smooth things out. You'd still have latency issues, and doing it client-side would make it possible to aimbot.
Anita Hardone Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire 210	Posted - 2013.08.01 03:14:00 - [3] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: Anita Hardone wrote: DICE did the switch for BF3. And its been that way ever since. Just seems like with all the issues regarding it as of now, CCP might as well give it a try. Both systems have their flaws. But since the game doesnt like to put people in their own regions anyways... client side would be able to somewhat smooth things out. You'd still have latency issues, and doing it client-side would make it possible to aimbot. On a PS3. lol Id love to see that.
Xocoyol Zaraoul Superior Genetics 984	Posted - 2013.08.01 03:16:00 - [4] - Quote Jailbroken PS3 and voila Black Ops 2 aimbot. Doesn't work on all games, but it's out there.
xxwhitedevilxx M Maphia Clan Corporation CRONOS. 449	Posted - 2013.08.01 03:16:00 - [5] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: Anita Hardone wrote: DICE did the switch for BF3. And its been that way ever since. Just seems like with all the issues regarding it as of now, CCP might as well give it a try. Both systems have their flaws. But since the game doesnt like to put people in their own regions anyways... client side would be able to somewhat smooth things out. You'd still have latency issues, and doing it client-side would make it possible to aimbot. Impossible to aimbot on a ps3.
xxwhitedevilxx M Maphia Clan Corporation CRONOS. 449	Posted - 2013.08.01 03:17:00 - [6] - Quote Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote: Jailbroken PS3 and voila Black Ops 2 aimbot. Doesn't work on all games, but it's out there. If you jailbreak your ps3, you can't play online. Yes, you have your aimbot anyway, but can't play online.
Doc Noah Algintal Core Gallente Federation 396	Posted - 2013.08.01 03:21:00 - [7] - Quote Dont think anyone would risk bricking their PS3 just to cheat. Dont think switching to client sided hit detection is necessary. I didnt have much issues with it prior to 1.2, however whatever they did to 1.2 and up seriously screwed it up. Lets hope they can fix it.
CoD isAIDS Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic 101	Posted - 2013.08.01 05:21:00 - [8] - Quote Anita Hardone wrote: DICE did the switch for BF3. And its been that way ever since. Just seems like with all the issues regarding it as of now, CCP might as well give it a try. Both systems have their flaws. But since the game doesnt like to put people in their own regions anyways... client side would be able to somewhat smooth things out. LOL BF3 and DICE and EA. Why do you want CCP to switch over a system that was probably forced onto DICE by the company that won the Golden Turd award twice in a row? (note to CCP: LOOK IT UP! - not trolling. EA has, as a matter of fact, won that award twice in a row)
CoD isAIDS Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic 101	Posted - 2013.08.01 05:22:00 - [9] - Quote xxwhitedevilxx M wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Anita Hardone wrote: DICE did the switch for BF3. And its been that way ever since. Just seems like with all the issues regarding it as of now, CCP might as well give it a try. Both systems have their flaws. But since the game doesnt like to put people in their own regions anyways... client side would be able to somewhat smooth things out. You'd still have latency issues, and doing it client-side would make it possible to aimbot. Impossible to aimbot on a ps3. Yes, you still could have some latency issues like die behind cover, but at least continent vs continent and people with high latencies will notice a positive difference. LOL People said it was impossible to hack anything related at all. The PSN was down for a month because of Anonymous. Next
xxwhitedevilxx M Maphia Clan Corporation CRONOS. 449	Posted - 2013.08.01 05:26:00 - [10] - Quote CoD isAIDS wrote: xxwhitedevilxx M wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Anita Hardone wrote: DICE did the switch for BF3. And its been that way ever since. Just seems like with all the issues regarding it as of now, CCP might as well give it a try. Both systems have their flaws. But since the game doesnt like to put people in their own regions anyways... client side would be able to somewhat smooth things out. You'd still have latency issues, and doing it client-side would make it possible to aimbot. Impossible to aimbot on a ps3. Yes, you still could have some latency issues like die behind cover, but at least continent vs continent and people with high latencies will notice a positive difference. LOL People said it was impossible to hack anything related at all. The PSN was down for a month because of Anonymous. Next Anonymous just ddos'ed PSN servers, taking it dow and infiltrating in it. Moreover, if it was even barely possible, don't you think that games like MAG, COD, BF would have been plagued with it?

Anita Hardone Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire 219	Posted - 2013.08.01 05:27:00 - [11] - Quote COD. Im beginning to feel like you are AIDs itself. Sony was hacked. But they brought in someone who worked for Homeland Security. Nothing has happened since. And do you know for a fact EA forced DICE to switch? No. Do you even know the difference between the two? Im going to assume "No you dont". But im sure once you read this you are going to google it all up and try to argue for no reason.
Its Leeroy Jennkins murderers anonymous 0	Posted - 2013.08.01 05:30:00 - [12] - Quote Anita Hardone wrote: DICE did the switch for BF3. And its been that way ever since. Just seems like with all the issues regarding it as of now, CCP might as well give it a try. Both systems have their flaws. But since the game doesnt like to put people in their own regions anyways... client side would be able to somewhat smooth things out. Been that way ever since? All that has been out so far is Bf3? What do you mean Since? Can you explain please.
Anita Hardone Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire 219	Posted - 2013.08.01 05:32:00 - [13] - Quote Its Leeroy Jennkins wrote: Anita Hardone wrote: DICE did the switch for BF3. And its been that way ever since. Just seems like with all the issues regarding it as of now, CCP might as well give it a try. Both systems have their flaws. But since the game doesnt like to put people in their own regions anyways... client side would be able to somewhat smooth things out. Been that way ever since? All that has been out so far is Bf3? What do you mean Since? Can you explain please. ... as in PSN has never been brought down or threatened by hackers.
BARDAS DUST University Ivy League 259	Posted - 2013.08.01 06:03:00 - [14] - Quote Client side? That is asking for abuse and cheaters. I would quit the game if CCP went that route.
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 6830	Posted - 2013.08.01 06:04:00 - [15] - Quote Anita Hardone wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Anita Hardone wrote: DICE did the switch for BF3. And its been that way ever since. Just seems like with all the issues regarding it as of now, CCP might as well give it a try. Both systems have their flaws. But since the game doesnt like to put people in their own regions anyways... client side would be able to somewhat smooth things out. You'd still have latency issues, and doing it client-side would make it possible to aimbot. On a PS3. lol Id love to see that. What people complain about is shooting at someone strafing and hitting the character body, but not the hit box since its somehere in front or behind them. Client side would make that happen less. Hello let me introduce you to bad things http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbfzcsUR7EU Google. I also hereby do not endorse this or the like products, I have never heard anything good come from it. Always resulting in losses well over the initial 60 usd cost of the software.
Anita Hardone Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire 219	Posted - 2013.08.01 06:06:00 - [16] - Quote BARDAS wrote: Client side? That is asking for abuse and cheaters. I would quit the game if CCP went that route. Only if its totally Client side. As in one person is the host. Which im not talking about.
xxwhitedevilxx M Maphia Clan Corporation CRONOS. 449	Posted - 2013.08.01 06:06:00 - [17] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Anita Hardone wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Anita Hardone wrote: DICE did the switch for BF3. And its been that way ever since. Just seems like with all the issues regarding it as of now, CCP might as well give it a try. Both systems have their flaws. But since the game doesnt like to put people in their own regions anyways... client side would be able to somewhat smooth things out. You'd still have latency issues, and doing it client-side would make it possible to aimbot. On a PS3. lol Id love to see that. What people complain about is shooting at someone strafing and hitting the character body, but not the hit box since its somehere in front or behind them. Client side would make that happen less. Hello let me introduce you to bad things http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbfzcsUR7EU Google. Please download it and play some BF3. LOL.
TheBlob95 B Kirkinen Risk Control Caldari State 15	Posted - 2013.08.01 06:15:00 - [18] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Anita Hardone wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Anita Hardone wrote: DICE did the switch for BF3. And its been that way ever since. Just seems like with all the issues regarding it as of now, CCP might as well give it a try. Both systems have their flaws. But since the game doesnt like to put people in their own regions anyways... client side would be able to somewhat smooth things out. You'd still have latency issues, and doing it client-side would make it possible to aimbot. On a PS3. lol Id love to see that. What people complain about is shooting at someone strafing and hitting the character body, but not the hit box since its somehere in front or behind them. Client side would make that happen less. Hello let me introduce you to bad things http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbfzcsUR7EU Google. I also hereby do not endorse this or the like products, I have never heard anything good come from it. Always resulting in losses well over the initial 60 usd cost of the software. That's obviously fake...
xxwhitedevilxx M Maphia Clan Corporation CRONOS. 449	Posted - 2013.08.01 06:16:00 - [19] - Quote Anita Hardone wrote: ^ that looks more like a scam. BARDAS wrote: Client side? That is asking for abuse and cheaters. I would quit the game if CCP went that route. Only if its totally Client side. As in one person is the host. Which im not talking about. I think Anita is referring to the same system MAG used. All calculation (if hit or not) were made local and then the whole package were sent to the host. In other words: In Dust happen: 1st hit sent to server (server say "true") 2nd hit sent to server (server say "true") 3rd hit lag (you see that you hit but it's untrue for the server due to lag) 4th hit lag (same as above) 5th hit sent to server What happened in MAG was a bit different: all the hit markers were calculated locally and then the whole package ( for example 30 rounds out of 35 hit the target and the target died) were sent to the server.
Anita Hardone Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire 220	Posted - 2013.08.01 06:17:00 - [20] - Quote If the CPM was smart they would remove the link altogether. Because someone might actually fall for it and end up bricking their PC or whatever they try to put it on.

xxwhitedevilxx M Maphia Clan Corporation CRONOS. 450	Posted - 2013.08.01 06:23:00 - [21] - Quote Anita Hardone wrote: If the CPM was smart they would remove the link altogether. Because someone might actually fall for it and end up bricking their PC or whatever they try to put it on. Posting such things is also against the TOS. Last time i checked Wolf wasnt above the law. yup you should remove it IWS...
Billi Gene The Southern Legion 205	Posted - 2013.08.01 08:10:00 - [22] - Quote Anita Hardone wrote: Its Leeroy Jennkins wrote: Anita Hardone wrote: DICE did the switch for BF3. And its been that way ever since. Just seems like with all the issues regarding it as of now, CCP might as well give it a try. Both systems have their flaws. But since the game doesnt like to put people in their own regions anyways... client side would be able to somewhat smooth things out. Been that way ever since? All that has been out so far is Bf3? What do you mean Since? Can you explain please. ... as in PSN has never been brought down or threatened by hackers. Edit: It doesnt even matter. Just ignore my responds to Aids, he was barely on topic and is just ranting. actually Sony was hacked and CC details sold over the net iirc, is this beyond the average goldfish memory span or was it just an hallucination? O.o
Delta 749 Kestrel Reconnaissance 1517	Posted - 2013.08.01 09:37:00 - [23] - Quote Anita Hardone wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Anita Hardone wrote: DICE did the switch for BF3. And its been that way ever since. Just seems like with all the issues regarding it as of now, CCP might as well give it a try. Both systems have their flaws. But since the game doesnt like to put people in their own regions anyways... client side would be able to somewhat smooth things out. You'd still have latency issues, and doing it client-side would make it possible to aimbot. On a PS3. lol Id love to see that. What people complain about is shooting at someone strafing and hitting the character body, but not the hit box since its somehere in front or behind them. Client side would make that happen less. You never played MGO when the server was still up huh Its more of a hassle to do but aimbots on consoles do exist
Mobius Wyvern BetaMax. 2790	Posted - 2013.08.01 11:51:00 - [24] - Quote xxwhitedevilxx M wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Anita Hardone wrote: DICE did the switch for BF3. And its been that way ever since. Just seems like with all the issues regarding it as of now, CCP might as well give it a try. Both systems have their flaws. But since the game doesnt like to put people in their own regions anyways... client side would be able to somewhat smooth things out. You'd still have latency issues, and doing it client-side would make it possible to aimbot. Impossible to aimbot on a ps3. Yes, you still could have some latency issues like die behind cover, but at least continent vs continent and people with high latencies will notice a positive difference. You do realize you just described that as impossible, right? I mean, you do realize you're on the internet? That's as uninformed a statement as calling a computer system "unhackable". It can and will always be done; all it takes is time.
xxwhitedevilxx M Maphia Clan Corporation CRONOS. 450	Posted - 2013.08.01 16:39:00 - [25] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: xxwhitedevilxx M wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Anita Hardone wrote: DICE did the switch for BF3. And its been that way ever since. Just seems like with all the issues regarding it as of now, CCP might as well give it a try. Both systems have their flaws. But since the game doesnt like to put people in their own regions anyways... client side would be able to somewhat smooth things out. You'd still have latency issues, and doing it client-side would make it possible to aimbot. Impossible to aimbot on a ps3. Yes, you still could have some latency issues like die behind cover, but at least continent vs continent and people with high latencies will notice a positive difference. You do realize you just described that as impossible, right? I mean, you do realize you're on the internet? That's as uninformed a statement as calling a computer system "unhackable". It can and will always be done; all it takes is time. ok but, up to now, nobody ever used an aimbot on ps3, just because even if you hack your ps3, you just can't connect it to internet. And, no, please, i was in the top 20 EU players in MGO and nobody ever aimbotted me you are just feeding trolls and PC elitist. Maybe that's just not my place anymore...You just shouldn't talk about something you know nothing about.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page