Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1368
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 16:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
Except for laser weapons and rails, please remove hitscan type weapon modes. Please replace the non laser, non rail weapons with projectiles that have travel time and ballistics as appropriate.
Concerning Processing power, computational weight, etc, where necessary reduce the rate of fire, and increase the per shot damage.
Hitscan is a terrible crutch, and hardly seems necessary in 2013. We had Tribes in 1998 with 32 player support and mainly weapons with realistic ballistics. |
King Trigger
DUST University Ivy League
6
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 16:43:00 -
[2] - Quote
Most of that went over my head, but +1. Let's get some bullets that act like bullets, right? |
Oso Peresoso
RisingSuns
448
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 16:44:00 -
[3] - Quote
nope. Gotta crawl before you can walk. These guys are new at FPS games. Don't fix what ain't broke.
Also um, plasma isn't affected by gravity and stuff so there's no need for bullet drop. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1368
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 16:46:00 -
[4] - Quote
Oso Peresoso wrote:nope. Gotta crawl before you can walk. These guys are new at FPS games. Don't fix what ain't broke. Also um, plasma isn't affected by gravity and stuff so there's no need for bullet drop.
That's why I said - where appropriate.
nevertheless, Dynamix managed to make Tribes play on computers in 1998 with 32 (or more) players per match, and nearly all weapons had projectile physics.
|
bacon blaster
BIG BAD W0LVES Eternal Syndicate
103
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 16:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
Oso Peresoso wrote:nope. Gotta crawl before you can walk. These guys are new at FPS games. Don't fix what ain't broke. Also um, plasma isn't affected by gravity and stuff so there's no need for bullet drop.
Actually, plasma is a state of matter, albeit a highly energized state of matter. As such, it is affected my gravity. That said, we are talking about using plasma weapons in an atmosphere which has problems on it's own, so, we can just skip that crap and make things that work here. |
King Trigger
DUST University Ivy League
7
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 16:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
I just think that this whole optimal/effective range thing is still a little unbelievable, and it's probably because they're coming at it from the wrong angle. After all, if I shoot an AR at 1000m, if it hits you you're probably still going to get a pretty nasty wound, but it's extremely unlikely to hit because of gravity/inaccuracy/wind/etc. Right? So maybe realistic bullet dynamics would fix the problems we're having with ranges, too. I've always been really stumped by the fact that my HMG bullets magically erode as they travel. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1376
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 19:53:00 -
[7] - Quote
Bump. Let's get some more realistic physics in Dust. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1400
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 22:23:00 -
[8] - Quote
Bump for a meaningful change to improve the feel of Dust. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
2816
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 22:40:00 -
[9] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:Except for laser weapons and rails, please remove hitscan type weapon modes. Please replace the non laser, non rail weapons with projectiles that have travel time and ballistics as appropriate.
Concerning Processing power, computational weight, etc, where necessary reduce the rate of fire, and increase the per shot damage.
Hitscan is a terrible crutch, and hardly seems necessary in 2013. We had Tribes in 1998 with 32 player support and mainly weapons with realistic ballistics. I talked to CCP Wolfman about this last year. Trying to calculate all that would result in more lag than you see now. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1406
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 22:41:00 -
[10] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Except for laser weapons and rails, please remove hitscan type weapon modes. Please replace the non laser, non rail weapons with projectiles that have travel time and ballistics as appropriate.
Concerning Processing power, computational weight, etc, where necessary reduce the rate of fire, and increase the per shot damage.
Hitscan is a terrible crutch, and hardly seems necessary in 2013. We had Tribes in 1998 with 32 player support and mainly weapons with realistic ballistics. I talked to CCP Wolfman about this last year. Trying to calculate all that would result in more lag than you see now.
Funny thing about that though, Dynamix was able to do this in 1998 with 32+ players per match. Think about that, Tribes had very few hitscan weapons 15 years ago and made it work with the same or larger numbers in a match than Dust. I call BS on that argument. |
|
Meeko Fent
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
478
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 22:43:00 -
[11] - Quote
Hmm, on one hand, bullets that move and have things like bullet drop sound great, but on the other, I feel that CCPs severs might explode from the stress of tens of thousands of people flying in spaceships, and hundreds of others shooting ARs with physics everywhere.
Bullet Drop, Yes.
Having to have a virtual bullet go from point A to point Dead, Hmm... Iffy. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
2816
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 22:44:00 -
[12] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Except for laser weapons and rails, please remove hitscan type weapon modes. Please replace the non laser, non rail weapons with projectiles that have travel time and ballistics as appropriate.
Concerning Processing power, computational weight, etc, where necessary reduce the rate of fire, and increase the per shot damage.
Hitscan is a terrible crutch, and hardly seems necessary in 2013. We had Tribes in 1998 with 32 player support and mainly weapons with realistic ballistics. I talked to CCP Wolfman about this last year. Trying to calculate all that would result in more lag than you see now. Funny thing about that though, Dynamix was able to do this in 1998 with 32+ players per match. Think about that, Tribes had very few hitscan weapons 15 years ago and made it work with the same or larger numbers in a match than Dust. I call BS on that argument. If they want to keep increasing the player count over time, they need to keep network traffic to a minimum, and they have stated intent to increase the player count above 48. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1406
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 22:45:00 -
[13] - Quote
Meeko Fent wrote:Hmm, on one hand, bullets that move and have things like bullet drop sound great, but on the other, I feel that CCPs severs might explode from the stress of tens of thousands of people flying in spaceships, and hundreds of others shooting ARs with physics everywhere.
Bullet Drop, Yes.
Having to have a virtual bullet go from point A to point Dead, Hmm... Iffy.
Sure, maybe so, but see my previous post. It isn't like it's a new thing.
Removing Hitscan mechanics would go a long way to making range a more important factor in the gun game of Dust. This would remove some the inherent advantages of point and click killers like the AR.
Regarding the lag issue. Yeah, it's possibly an issue. I honestly doubt it though - Tribes did this 15 years ago with a maximum number of players per match of 128. <----- |
BL4CKST4R
warravens League of Infamy
873
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 23:26:00 -
[14] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:Except for laser weapons and rails, please remove hitscan type weapon modes. Please replace the non laser, non rail weapons with projectiles that have travel time and ballistics as appropriate.
Concerning Processing power, computational weight, etc, where necessary reduce the rate of fire, and increase the per shot damage.
Hitscan is a terrible crutch, and hardly seems necessary in 2013. We had Tribes in 1998 with 32 player support and mainly weapons with realistic ballistics.
Rail gun would have ballistics also, it uses magnetism to fire a projectile. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1407
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 23:28:00 -
[15] - Quote
BL4CKST4R wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Except for laser weapons and rails, please remove hitscan type weapon modes. Please replace the non laser, non rail weapons with projectiles that have travel time and ballistics as appropriate.
Concerning Processing power, computational weight, etc, where necessary reduce the rate of fire, and increase the per shot damage.
Hitscan is a terrible crutch, and hardly seems necessary in 2013. We had Tribes in 1998 with 32 player support and mainly weapons with realistic ballistics. Rail gun would have ballistics also, it uses magnetism to fire a projectile.
Yes, but the round flies very fast, making ballistics probably negligible for it. 2500 m/s I think, and while there's no reason this couldn't be modelled, it's unlikely to matter much considering the small map sizes.
|
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
968
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 23:44:00 -
[16] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:BL4CKST4R wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Except for laser weapons and rails, please remove hitscan type weapon modes. Please replace the non laser, non rail weapons with projectiles that have travel time and ballistics as appropriate.
Concerning Processing power, computational weight, etc, where necessary reduce the rate of fire, and increase the per shot damage.
Hitscan is a terrible crutch, and hardly seems necessary in 2013. We had Tribes in 1998 with 32 player support and mainly weapons with realistic ballistics. Rail gun would have ballistics also, it uses magnetism to fire a projectile. Yes, but the round flies very fast, making ballistics probably negligible for it. 2500 m/s I think, and while there's no reason this couldn't be modelled, it's unlikely to matter much considering the small map sizes. Tbh, i can't see why it would matter with any current hitscan weapon within its respective range. It's safe to assume that most weapons currently in the game or announced would have projectile velocities in excess of 700m/s.
Given optimal ranges of often around or under 50m the travel time would be completely insignificant i.e indistinguishable from server lag, input lag and and human reaction speeds.
This makes me wonder if it's worth the development cost and added server stress. Not arguing that it's impossible to manage the overhead but both development and server resources could've been spent on other, more noticable areas. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1408
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 23:47:00 -
[17] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Buster Friently wrote:BL4CKST4R wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Except for laser weapons and rails, please remove hitscan type weapon modes. Please replace the non laser, non rail weapons with projectiles that have travel time and ballistics as appropriate.
Concerning Processing power, computational weight, etc, where necessary reduce the rate of fire, and increase the per shot damage.
Hitscan is a terrible crutch, and hardly seems necessary in 2013. We had Tribes in 1998 with 32 player support and mainly weapons with realistic ballistics. Rail gun would have ballistics also, it uses magnetism to fire a projectile. Yes, but the round flies very fast, making ballistics probably negligible for it. 2500 m/s I think, and while there's no reason this couldn't be modelled, it's unlikely to matter much considering the small map sizes. Tbh, i can't see why it would matter with any current hitscan weapon within its respective range. It's safe to assume that most weapons currently in the game or announced would have projectile velocities in excess of 700m/s. Given optimal ranges of often around or under 50m the travel time would be completely insignificant i.e indistinguishable from server lag, input lag and and human reaction speeds. This makes me wonder if it's worth the development cost and added server stress. Not arguing that it's impossible to manage the overhead but both development and server resources could've been spent on other, more noticable areas.
Could be. I don't know what the travel rate of other weapons are supposed to be. I can say this though: it makes a big difference when it comes to the weapons that currently have ballistics - flaylock, MD, FG. These weapons are much harder at distance because as the travel time increases, so does the uncertainty about where the target may be once the round arrives.
Even a difference of a half or quarter second would go a long way IMHO.
|
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
968
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 00:50:00 -
[18] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:Buster Friently wrote:BL4CKST4R wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Except for laser weapons and rails, please remove hitscan type weapon modes. Please replace the non laser, non rail weapons with projectiles that have travel time and ballistics as appropriate.
Concerning Processing power, computational weight, etc, where necessary reduce the rate of fire, and increase the per shot damage.
Hitscan is a terrible crutch, and hardly seems necessary in 2013. We had Tribes in 1998 with 32 player support and mainly weapons with realistic ballistics. Rail gun would have ballistics also, it uses magnetism to fire a projectile. Yes, but the round flies very fast, making ballistics probably negligible for it. 2500 m/s I think, and while there's no reason this couldn't be modelled, it's unlikely to matter much considering the small map sizes. Tbh, i can't see why it would matter with any current hitscan weapon within its respective range. It's safe to assume that most weapons currently in the game or announced would have projectile velocities in excess of 700m/s. Given optimal ranges of often around or under 50m the travel time would be completely insignificant i.e indistinguishable from server lag, input lag and and human reaction speeds. This makes me wonder if it's worth the development cost and added server stress. Not arguing that it's impossible to manage the overhead but both development and server resources could've been spent on other, more noticable areas. Could be. I don't know what the travel rate of other weapons are supposed to be. I can say this though: it makes a big difference when it comes to the weapons that currently have ballistics - flaylock, MD, FG. These weapons are much harder at distance because as the travel time increases, so does the uncertainty about where the target may be once the round arrives. Even a difference of a half or quarter second would go a long way IMHO. The 700m/s are pulled off from google and supposedly close to what an ak 47 and similar manages (i'm uncreative ).
I can only assume that projectile weapons follow the basic mass*velocity rule so speeds would be similar to/higher than what we have today to penetrate shields/armor unless we fire magnum caliber full auto weapons at each other. The HMG for example was around 5-6mm caliber iirc, less mass than the 7.62mm of an ak and not even close to a magnum so speeds should be pretty high just out of real world intuition.
Blasters might be considerably slower but if i'd design a close range general purpose weapon (say, Gal AR) i'd make sure to give it enough speed so the user does not have to lead shots within its intended range. We could assert this to be the case and use it as an excuse to keep it hitscan. Using it outside of its range can already be balanced through falloff mechanics so that there's no unfixable risk of abuse either.
While i agree that weapon ballistics are an interesting and valid way to allow for weapon options that are harder to handle but also potentionally more effective i'd argue that there is also value in more reliable, easy to use hitscan weapons for those who prefer a dependable solution that is as consistent as possible. Different players and play styles have varying preferences and allowing each a wide choice is a good thing in my opinion.
With that said I can easily support the addition of new guns that have noticable travel times and ballistic arches as there's a distinct lack of those outside of niche and specialist options. I do not think however that current hitscan weapons require a change in that regard. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1412
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 00:54:00 -
[19] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:Buster Friently wrote:BL4CKST4R wrote:
Rail gun would have ballistics also, it uses magnetism to fire a projectile.
Yes, but the round flies very fast, making ballistics probably negligible for it. 2500 m/s I think, and while there's no reason this couldn't be modelled, it's unlikely to matter much considering the small map sizes. Tbh, i can't see why it would matter with any current hitscan weapon within its respective range. It's safe to assume that most weapons currently in the game or announced would have projectile velocities in excess of 700m/s. Given optimal ranges of often around or under 50m the travel time would be completely insignificant i.e indistinguishable from server lag, input lag and and human reaction speeds. This makes me wonder if it's worth the development cost and added server stress. Not arguing that it's impossible to manage the overhead but both development and server resources could've been spent on other, more noticable areas. Could be. I don't know what the travel rate of other weapons are supposed to be. I can say this though: it makes a big difference when it comes to the weapons that currently have ballistics - flaylock, MD, FG. These weapons are much harder at distance because as the travel time increases, so does the uncertainty about where the target may be once the round arrives. Even a difference of a half or quarter second would go a long way IMHO. The 700m/s are pulled off from google and supposedly close to what an ak 47 and similar manages (i'm uncreative ). I can only assume that projectile weapons follow the basic mass*velocity rule so speeds would be similar to/higher than what we have today to penetrate shields/armor unless we fire magnum caliber full auto weapons at each other. The HMG for example was around 5-6mm caliber iirc, less mass than the 7.62mm of an ak and not even close to a magnum so speeds should be pretty high just out of real world intuition. Blasters might be considerably slower but if i'd design a close range general purpose weapon (say, Gal AR) i'd make sure to give it enough speed so the user does not have to lead shots within its intended range. We could assert this to be the case and use it as an excuse to keep it hitscan. Using it outside of its range can already be balanced through falloff mechanics so that there's no unfixable risk of abuse either. While i agree that weapon ballistics are an interesting and valid way to allow for weapon options that are harder to handle but also potentionally more effective i'd argue that there is also value in more reliable, easy to use hitscan weapons for those who prefer a dependable solution that is as consistent as possible. Different players and play styles have varying preferences and allowing each a wide choice is a good thing in my opinion. With that said I can easily support the addition of new guns that have noticable travel times and ballistic arches as there's a distinct lack of those outside of niche and specialist options. I do not think however that current hitscan weapons require a change in that regard.
Well thanks for your input.
Obviously, I think removing Hitscan removes a gimmick, and also helps to balance the current crop of Hitscan weapons. Beyond that, I think your real world examples are fine, but not really relevant to Dust. Look at the current speed of Swarm missiles, MD rounds and Flaylock rounds. All of these are significantly slower than their real world counterparts.
|
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
2825
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 02:35:00 -
[20] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote: Well thanks for your input.
Obviously, I think removing Hitscan removes a gimmick, and also helps to balance the current crop of Hitscan weapons. Beyond that, I think your real world examples are fine, but not really relevant to Dust. Look at the current speed of Swarm missiles, MD rounds and Flaylock rounds. All of these are significantly slower than their real world counterparts.
The issue, again, is with network traffic.
Sure, they could probably make ballistics work just fine with the player count we have right now, and probably even with 48 players, but do you really want this game to stay capped at 48 players?
I'm more than willing to tolerate hitscan in exchange for higher player counts.
Something else that was mentioned in my conversation with him is that making that kind of a change would just result in people thinking something was wrong with the game's hit detection, since so many people never come on the forums, and we have clear evidence that the ones who don't don't even read the patch notes when a new patch drops. They just log in, skip that screen, and then find something they don't like and either come here to *****, or leave the game and ***** about it in other places.
Best to just leave things as they are. |
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1422
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 20:47:00 -
[21] - Quote
I don't think things are best left as they are necessarily. This isn't new or particularly high tech. Any devs want to comment? |
Oso Peresoso
RisingSuns
516
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 21:00:00 -
[22] - Quote
bacon blaster wrote:Oso Peresoso wrote:nope. Gotta crawl before you can walk. These guys are new at FPS games. Don't fix what ain't broke. Also um, plasma isn't affected by gravity and stuff so there's no need for bullet drop. Actually, plasma is a state of matter, albeit a highly energized state of matter. As such, it is affected my gravity. That said, we are talking about using plasma weapons in an atmosphere which has problems on it's own, so, we can just skip that crap and make things that work here.
you misunderstand me. What I did was some faux-science handwaving to provide a lore justification to refuse the OP's suggestion, not an actual assertion that plasma was immune to gravity. |
Poplo Furuya
Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation
558
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 21:13:00 -
[23] - Quote
Buster, regarding Starsiege in 1998: the physics was a major part of it, the engine was made to accomodate those physics from the outset. Retrofitting an engine you didn't develop to accomodate more advanced physics is a very different kettle of fish.
Those weapons are also low rate of fire, relatively. Spinfusors and Mortars are 1 shot at a time, Plasma Guns and Grenade Launcher are around the MD's rate of fire. Chaingun is closest to being on par with Dust automatics but still falls short by a bit.
In a perfect world we'd be rid of hitscan but in this one the calibration of the UE3 engine with the current game is still being worked on. |
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
852
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 21:14:00 -
[24] - Quote
wish I could give you +100 for this thread alas I must give you +1 good sir |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1429
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 23:39:00 -
[25] - Quote
Sinboto Simmons wrote:wish I could give you +100 for this thread alas I must give you +1 good sir Well, thanks anyway. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1429
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 23:41:00 -
[26] - Quote
Poplo Furuya wrote:Buster, regarding Starsiege in 1998: the physics was a major part of it, the engine was made to accomodate those physics from the outset. Retrofitting an engine you didn't develop to accomodate more advanced physics is a very different kettle of fish.
Those weapons are also low rate of fire, relatively. Spinfusors and Mortars are 1 shot at a time, Plasma Guns and Grenade Launcher are around the MD's rate of fire. Chaingun is closest to being on par with Dust automatics but still falls short by a bit.
In a perfect world we'd be rid of hitscan but in this one the calibration of the UE3 engine with the current game is still being worked on.
You'll note that I point out in the OP that where technical limitations of rate of fire are concerned, general DPS should be kept the same, but the ROF and relate variables should be adjusted to accommodate the extra physics load.
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1438
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 02:18:00 -
[27] - Quote
C'mon CCP, we don't need this fakey mechanic in Dust. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1487
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 17:13:00 -
[28] - Quote
EZ mode really needs to go. Hitscan doesn't really fit with the gritty feel that Dust is trying to achieve, it's too arcadey. |
Killar-12
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
442
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 17:19:00 -
[29] - Quote
+1 |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1639
|
Posted - 2013.08.14 14:59:00 -
[30] - Quote
Dust needs to step up and get rid of these "toy" mechanics. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |