Arcturis Vanguard
Pure Innocence. EoN.
60
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 19:31:00 -
[1] - Quote
Azura Sakura wrote:Rogatien Merc wrote:Soldier of Mawat wrote:Rogatien Merc wrote:So let's cut to the chase... with well-established corps like Molon Labe, New Eden's Most Wanted, and MSF wanting some sort of consideration... it is no longer about corps needing to become established or gain experience (5-10 matches a day is an indy corp apparently...).
It is about corps not being able to beat EoN. but still wanting to be involved in PC. They want a farm league that they can be moved down to from the majors. Farm leagues not only house new greenhorn players, but also older guys who may have been injured, replaced, or just lost their mojo.
Basically the community consensus Cubs, is that no corp in EoN. should attack anyone at all whatsoever period, and that no EoN. member should participate in any PC match period. We're well established? Sure we have been around for awhile but we still have a lot of work to do to pull our s hit together. Yes, you are. And again if the community consensus is that you are not, then like I said... this is all about EoN. corps and players not attacking or participating anywhere on the map but PFC. Can you explain why you think we're not a indie corp and well established
MSF is an established Corp. They have been around since closed beta with a variety of closed beta vets to green players with low SP/WP s. MSF is technically an "indie" Corp as there is no alliance and a true mercenary organization. Battlefield organization is not comparable to high end corps (team players, synergy, nyain San, etc) but will improve as more battles take place.
MSF would be placed in the mid range "tier" as they are better then corps that are just starting off and can compete with most established corps but possibly fall short of the top tier corps. After all, when we attacked synergy, we were rofl stomped. In the chromosome cup, we gave team players a good showing, but ultimately fell short.
Just my 2 isk, after all you guys know I still luvz you all ;) |
Arcturis Vanguard
Pure Innocence. EoN.
61
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 02:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
The concept of PFC is good for corps starting off in PC and for those who want to have a competitive match without going to a pub. I feel that CCP kinda messed up getting rid of Corp battles in general as the need for fight club wouldn't exists, but that is another topic.
A few flaws I see within PFC starts off with the idea of permanently owning a district. it is unfair for corps who currently do not own a district to have to spend 30m a pop over and over again to gain experience. If a Corp can out muscle another, they should have the right to take it. This creates a few positives. It teaches risk vs reward for corps that own the district. It will also keep a sleeper Corp from funding a larger Corp in secret. The previous sentence states an exploitable situation which I find disturbing.
The idea of ringing for PFC doesn't bode well with me. I understand we are mercenaries first and foremost. We get paid to fight and people cannot always be there for battles, but bringing in larger groups of outside help to win for you is not what PFC should be about. It's for improvement within ones own Corp to be more competitive then you are now. I'm not quite sure atm on how to keep this under control, but if a Corp shows proof that a Corp is not adhering to the rules, it is then up to the powers that be to remove the accused Corp from the district and resell to the highest bidder that falls within the qualifications of entering PFC.
I will leave this for now to allow others to add input and expand on some ideas that I have provided. |