| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare
Gallente Federation
224
   |
Posted - 2013.07.30 23:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
Yeah so in the description it states that the Flaylock has Seeker Missile Capability and was Ninja nerfed within minutes of its release.
So now that you have balanced the Flaylocks can we have this back please? 
If not I really do feel as though we would deserve a respec of Flaylock SP's for false description. |
demonkiller 12
Seraphim Auxiliaries
86
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 23:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:Yeah so in the description it states that the Flaylock has Seeker Missile Capability and was Ninja nerfed within minutes of its release. So now that you have balanced the Flaylocks can we have this back please? If not I really do feel as though we would deserve a respec of Flaylock SP's for false description.
no, now go cry in the corner |
cedz636
Brutor Vanguard
Minmatar Republic
38
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 23:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:So now that you have balanced the Flaylocks can we have this back please?
if you knowingly ran the flaylock because it was OP than shame on you, you don't deserve a respec. pick a corner |
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare
Gallente Federation
227
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 23:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
cedz636 wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:So now that you have balanced the Flaylocks can we have this back please? if you knowingly ran the flaylock because it was OP then shame on you, you don't deserve a respec. pick a corner
Nope did not run them because they were OP in fact I ran them before the TAC OP Gate.
CCP made this weapon and wrote the description up not me.
I liked what I saw and started using them.
I did not cry one single time when they Ninja nerfed the Seeker part of the description and now that they have balanced this weapon I am asking for what I originally speced into. |
Cosgar
ParagonX
3454
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 23:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
Maybe there's going to be an AV variant? |
broonfondle majikthies
P.O.N.A.G.S.
D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
67
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 23:44:00 -
[6] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:cedz636 wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:So now that you have balanced the Flaylocks can we have this back please? if you knowingly ran the flaylock because it was OP then shame on you, you don't deserve a respec. pick a corner Nope did not run them because they were OP in fact I ran them before the TAC OP Gate. CCP made this weapon and wrote the description up not me. I liked what I saw and started using them. I did not cry one single time when they Ninja nerfed the Seeker part of the description and now that they have balanced this weapon I am asking for what I originally speced into.
sooo... you admit your only asking for a respec cus of the nerf? seeing as you lived with the very thing your petitioning against for so long and only now deciding its not fair
As stated above, go cry in a corner |
cedz636
Brutor Vanguard
Minmatar Republic
38
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 23:47:00 -
[7] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:cedz636 wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:So now that you have balanced the Flaylocks can we have this back please? if you knowingly ran the flaylock because it was OP then shame on you, you don't deserve a respec. pick a corner Nope did not run them because they were OP in fact I ran them before the TAC OP Gate. CCP made this weapon and wrote the description up not me. I liked what I saw and started using them. I did not cry one single time when they Ninja nerfed the Seeker part of the description and now that they have balanced this weapon I am asking for what I originally speced into.
you said it twice. CCP balanced the flaylock. in order to balance something, it needs to be out of balance, correct? therefore, you knowingly ran the flaylock because it was OP. cal logi dudes aren't complaining about their nerf because they new it was a little OP. why u gotta be like that??????
i'm busting your b*lls man. honestly, if you're a good shot, the flaylock will still be a good weapon...more than you can say for a few other weapons in the game. It's just more of a sidearm now, as intended. no need for a respec. unless you are really drowning in tears over this, then good luck with your respect |
Galvan Nized
Deep Space Republic
Top Men.
187
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 23:47:00 -
[8] - Quote
Big no for infantry but for vehicles I could see it, maybe not like swarms but gentle curving. |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
1013
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 23:49:00 -
[9] - Quote
GTA-V FTW wrote:Yeah so in the description it states that the Flaylock has Seeker Missile Capability and was Ninja nerfed within minutes of its release. So now that you have balanced the Flaylocks can we have this back please? If not I really do feel as though we would deserve a respec of Flaylock SP's for false description.
Ha ha, this is like those lawyers who try to get people off on an obscure technicality rather than fighting the actual case. |
Konohamaru Sarutobi
Ahrendee Mercenaries
EoN.
544
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 23:57:00 -
[10] - Quote
demonkiller 12 wrote:GTA-V FTW wrote:Yeah so in the description it states that the Flaylock has Seeker Missile Capability and was Ninja nerfed within minutes of its release. So now that you have balanced the Flaylocks can we have this back please? If not I really do feel as though we would deserve a respec of Flaylock SP's for false description. no, now go cry in the corner
But, but, that's your spot to cry when you die |
Vesidar
Algintal Core
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 00:00:00 -
[11] - Quote
I think seeker missiles could work; maybe give them some kinda mechanic where they'll track things better or worse based on the scan profile of the object in question, this way there's a way to defend against the tracking capabilities. |
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare
Gallente Federation
229
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 12:53:00 -
[12] - Quote
So CCP when are we getting this feature back? |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |