|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
259
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 07:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Why listen to the community when CPM knows best hey?! Not taking sides in this argument, but just want to point out, the 'community' doesn't know best either. If you can point to 1 thread, just 1 thread, with a decent number of replies where everyone is agreed on a certain point, I'll take my words back.
Half the time you have people complaining about one thing and a bunch of other people trolling them.. You turn around and there's another thread up on the same matter with the trolls complaining this time, and the whiners trolling them... |
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
259
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 07:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
Evil-Stuffed-Animal wrote:I think that CCP should just stick to making "space" games and leave the fps' elements to the big boys. This game was mildly enjoyable before they deployed that god-awful "Uprising" build. Furthermore, is it me or does this game get worse with each update? . . . nevermind . . . you don't have to answer that. lol
I'm sorry to sound so harsh CCP, but you guys keep trying and that's what makes the game worse. Here's what you should do: scrap the game, hire veteran devs to develop a better game and start over because you could stick a fork in this one (for me at least).
Oh and . . . what does "514" mean anyway? So if you're that fed up, why wouldn't you leave and go pay for a game one of the 'big boys' are making or have made?
You claim Dust is dying/dead. How does hiring other people, and also spending more money and starting from scratch mean that CCP can 'save' their game? It doesn't make any sense from a business and commercial perspective. |
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
270
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 06:04:00 -
[3] - Quote
ADP Silenced wrote:Ok so this makes ^^^right up there^^^ no sense at all...There are still peeps outside the Academy with PROTO-everything that still don't understand about all these things(If you want proof, I direct you to the SKILL RESPEC threads)...The point isnt about the learning...It is about the game being playable...fun..and replay value.
Try playing the same map over and see how long that lasts for you no matter how good you are Peeps outside the BA with 'proto everything' that don't understand about how to hack, how to work in a squad etc.?
CCP should totally cater to brain-dead people like that.
In fact, CCP should totally go to their houses, knock on their doors, and teach them how to plug in the ps3 and turn in on. CCP should also hold their dicks for them while they pee since they seem fairly incompetent.
|
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
285
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 10:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
Evil-Stuffed-Animal wrote:dustwaffle wrote:Evil-Stuffed-Animal wrote:I think that CCP should just stick to making "space" games and leave the fps' elements to the big boys. This game was mildly enjoyable before they deployed that god-awful "Uprising" build. Furthermore, is it me or does this game get worse with each update? . . . nevermind . . . you don't have to answer that. lol
I'm sorry to sound so harsh CCP, but you guys keep trying and that's what makes the game worse. Here's what you should do: scrap the game, hire veteran devs to develop a better game and start over because you could stick a fork in this one (for me at least).
Oh and . . . what does "514" mean anyway? So if you're that fed up, why wouldn't you leave and go pay for a game one of the 'big boys' are making or have made? You claim Dust is dying/dead. How does hiring other people, and also spending more money and starting from scratch mean that CCP can 'save' their game? It doesn't make any sense from a business and commercial perspective. *fail* you fanboys are too easy lol never said that i was "fed up". I didnt pay for this trash so there's nothing to be fed up about. Id just delete it off my hdd. The only reason I even get on is to chat with clanmates who actually like this game. Cool story bro.
lol @ thinking 'fanboy' is an insult to be used in place of an actual point or counter-argument. |
|
|
|