DUST Search - request for new map

v4victory wrote:

Nova Knife wrote:

I like the idea of vehicle-only maps, but your argument is flawed. You cite the expense as a cause of mixing infantry and vehicles as 'unfun' yet introduce a mode where you're going to lose a -lot- of vehicles by the sheer design of the mode?

No, I don't think something like this would be very fun at all, for as long as vehicles are so prohibitively expensive for pretty much no reason. But, once they fix the cost, this could be fun.

easy way to fix it give the game mode vehical salvage moduals turrets and vehcals rewarded at th end of battle also calling rewards give them people in the enforcers a reason to use them very easy the more isk you risk the better your isk rewards such as 50 percent of the cost is returned dont think anyone would complain about that so every 2 tanks or dropships you lost you get reinbursted for 1 automaticly kinda like the insurance on eve where if your ship blows you get some of the money back also to encourace people to heal other vehicals give rewards based on there prerformance not there wp if you get the longest kill give them 100k isk if you heal the mot give them 100k not fixed numbers but the idea would make the cost worth it along with geting a percentage of the kill say a sica is 50k madrugar 100k enforcer 500k isk for each one you destroy

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
v4victory The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 2	Posted - 2013.07.30 08:16:00 - [1] - Quote tank maps and dropship maps where you had to be in a dropship or tank and when i say in you you have to be driving it so 16 vs 16 tanks and 16 vs 16 dropships would just add an amazing and rewarding game mode for us vehical drivers not to mention we wouldnt have to deal with losing our expensive vehicals to cheap suits thus making the game far more enjoyable for us to play \\\ thank you and have a good day v4victory
darkiller240 INGLORIOUS-INQUISITION 113	Posted - 2013.07.30 08:36:00 - [2] - Quote iv seen hundres of these threads i woulder if it would be implemented i would love it +1
Nova Knife Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 1271	Posted - 2013.07.30 08:44:00 - [3] - Quote I like the idea of vehicle-only maps, but your argument is flawed. You cite the expense as a cause of mixing infantry and vehicles as 'unfun' yet introduce a mode where you're going to lose a -lot- of vehicles by the sheer design of the mode? No, I don't think something like this would be very fun at all, for as long as vehicles are so prohibitively expensive for pretty much no reason. But, once they fix the cost, this could be fun.
Cosgar ParagonX 3372	Posted - 2013.07.30 08:47:00 - [4] - Quote Nova Knife wrote: I like the idea of vehicle-only maps, but your argument is flawed. You cite the expense as a cause of mixing infantry and vehicles as 'unfun' yet introduce a mode where you're going to lose a -lot- of vehicles by the sheer design of the mode? No, I don't think something like this would be very fun at all, for as long as vehicles are so prohibitively expensive for pretty much no reason. But, once they fix the cost, this could be fun. Instead of fixing costs, make vehicles worth their price.
darkiller240 INGLORIOUS-INQUISITION 113	Posted - 2013.07.30 09:00:00 - [5] - Quote Nova Knife wrote: I like the idea of vehicle-only maps, but your argument is flawed. You cite the expense as a cause of mixing infantry and vehicles as 'unfun' yet introduce a mode where you're going to lose a -lot- of vehicles by the sheer design of the mode? No, I don't think something like this would be very fun at all, for as long as vehicles are so prohibitively expensive for pretty much no reason. But, once they fix the cost, this could be fun. well think about it if lot of vehicles are gona lost their will be a bigger payout at the end right?
XxGhazbaranxX The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 194	Posted - 2013.07.30 09:15:00 - [6] - Quote Cosgar wrote: Nova Knife wrote: I like the idea of vehicle-only maps, but your argument is flawed. You cite the expense as a cause of mixing infantry and vehicles as 'unfun' yet introduce a mode where you're going to lose a -lot- of vehicles by the sheer design of the mode? No, I don't think something like this would be very fun at all, for as long as vehicles are so prohibitively expensive for pretty much no reason. But, once they fix the cost, this could be fun. Instead of fixing costs, make vehicles worth their price. Exactly. But then again they are strd vehicles. Lets hope the overhaul they are getting will give something to strive for
v4victory The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 3	Posted - 2013.07.30 10:07:00 - [7] - Quote Nova Knife wrote: I like the idea of vehicle-only maps, but your argument is flawed. You cite the expense as a cause of mixing infantry and vehicles as 'unfun' yet introduce a mode where you're going to lose a -lot- of vehicles by the sheer design of the mode? No, I don't think something like this would be very fun at all, for as long as vehicles are so prohibitively expensive for pretty much no reason. But, once they fix the cost, this could be fun. easy way to fix it give the game mode vehical salvage moduals turrets and vehcals rewarded at th end of battle also calling rewards give them people in the enforcers a reason to use them very easy the more isk you risk the better your isk rewards such as 50 percent of the cost is returned dont think anyone would complain about that so every 2 tanks or dropships you lost you get reinbursted for 1 automaticly kinda like the insurance on eve where if your ship blows you get some of the money back also to encourace people to heal other vehicals give rewards based on there prerformance not there wp if you get the longest kill give them 100k isk if you heal the mot give them 100k not fixed numbers but the idea would make the cost worth it along with geting a percentage of the kill say a sica is 50k madrugar 100k enforcer 500k isk for each one you destroy
darkiller240 INGLORIOUS-INQUISITION 113	Posted - 2013.07.30 10:19:00 - [8] - Quote v4victory wrote: Nova Knife wrote: I like the idea of vehicle-only maps, but your argument is flawed. You cite the expense as a cause of mixing infantry and vehicles as 'unfun' yet introduce a mode where you're going to lose a -lot- of vehicles by the sheer design of the mode? No, I don't think something like this would be very fun at all, for as long as vehicles are so prohibitively expensive for pretty much no reason. But, once they fix the cost, this could be fun. easy way to fix it give the game mode vehical salvage moduals turrets and vehcals rewarded at th end of battle also calling rewards give them people in the enforcers a reason to use them very easy the more isk you risk the better your isk rewards such as 50 percent of the cost is returned dont think anyone would complain about that so every 2 tanks or dropships you lost you get reinbursted for 1 automaticly kinda like the insurance on eve where if your ship blows you get some of the money back also to encourace people to heal other vehicals give rewards based on there prerformance not there wp if you get the longest kill give them 100k isk if you heal the mot give them 100k not fixed numbers but the idea would make the cost worth it along with geting a percentage of the kill say a sica is 50k madrugar 100k enforcer 500k isk for each one you destroy so in short insurance for vechals,, good idea as they cost a ton
v4victory The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 3	Posted - 2013.07.30 10:20:00 - [9] - Quote and another way of making the mode not cost the isk is have ccp's vehical department come up with preset fits for it and based on what you have skilled into is what fits you have available when you spawn in at the garage or airstrip you have to select militia standard shield or armor enforcer logistics then select blaster rail missile and you would get a preloaded fit based on what you selected and then it would just be a vehical match of good fun and you can just keep the rewards the same as they are now


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page