DUST Search - New Laser Rifle Scope, coming soon

John Demonsbane wrote:

Ydubbs81 RND wrote:

ladwar wrote:

HEAD- HUNTER-GEO wrote:

And once More CCP ignores us assault riffle guys were is are AR scopes i ask once more??

TAR and burst AR have scopes, theres no reason for a scope on a full auto short range weapon, why do you want one? lasers optimal range is past AR effective range so they should get a scope.

I doubt that he really means scopes...we want reflex sights, at the very least. Not to mention, scopes on ARs in fps games are extremely common. In fact, they are as common as reflex sights. Most shooters use scopes for increased accuracy, that's why.

Realistically there is no reason for traditional scopes on ANY of these weapons with the possible exclusion of the sniper rifle. I mean, we are inside sealed dropsuits and are looking through lenses already, how could the suits optics not simply link up with the gun "sight"? Yes, yes, I know, it's a standard convention to use sights like this in FPS but seriously, any type of iron sight, or any sight that would significantly obscure your view of the battlefield makes no sense!


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 4 post(s)
Ydubbs81 RND Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN. 1655	Posted - 2013.07.30 12:18:00 - [1] - Quote What do we think??..the AR is hard to use, CCP. Noone even uses the laser rifle. The iron sight on the AR is hard to use because you can barely see the dot that you have to aim with. A lot of the people like the way it looks but it isn't very functional. I don't understand how one can justify no sights on an assault rifle 6 months after the fps game has been released. This is unprecedented!!!!...and not in a good way either. What bothers me is that you have sights on weapons that are used the least. I don't understand the logic for placing sights on lasers, scrambler, and tactical rifles.....and totally ignore the most used weapon in the game. Even the submachine gun, which can't be used at distances has a sight. Can't you guys see the problem???? This is a shooter that is designed to not shoot....aim mwchanics are blown, hip fire is broken, hit detection suffers, no sights, and a dysfunctional iron sight with a barely visible bar to aim with. Now...what do you think??
Ydubbs81 RND Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN. 1655	Posted - 2013.07.30 12:26:00 - [2] - Quote ladwar wrote: HEAD- HUNTER-GEO wrote: And once More CCP ignores us assault riffle guys were is are AR scopes i ask once more?? TAR and burst AR have scopes, theres no reason for a scope on a full auto short range weapon, why do you want one? lasers optimal range is past AR effective range so they should get a scope. I doubt that he really means scopes...we want reflex sights, at the very least. Not to mention, scopes on ARs in fps games are extremely common. In fact, they are as common as reflex sights. Most shooters use scopes for increased accuracy, that's why.
Ydubbs81 RND Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN. 1661	Posted - 2013.08.01 10:02:00 - [3] - Quote John Demonsbane wrote: Ydubbs81 RND wrote: ladwar wrote: HEAD- HUNTER-GEO wrote: And once More CCP ignores us assault riffle guys were is are AR scopes i ask once more?? TAR and burst AR have scopes, theres no reason for a scope on a full auto short range weapon, why do you want one? lasers optimal range is past AR effective range so they should get a scope. I doubt that he really means scopes...we want reflex sights, at the very least. Not to mention, scopes on ARs in fps games are extremely common. In fact, they are as common as reflex sights. Most shooters use scopes for increased accuracy, that's why. Realistically there is no reason for traditional scopes on ANY of these weapons with the possible exclusion of the sniper rifle. I mean, we are inside sealed dropsuits and are looking through lenses already, how could the suits optics not simply link up with the gun "sight"? Yes, yes, I know, it's a standard convention to use sights like this in FPS but seriously, any type of iron sight, or any sight that would significantly obscure your view of the battlefield makes no sense! Realistically, we aren't even living in the future with sealed dropsuits or whatever. Your post about no sights on an assault rifle in a first-person shooter makes no sense.