|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Knightshade Belladonna
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
730
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:25:00 -
[1] - Quote
Karazantor wrote:Charlotte O'Dell wrote:wait...so you're counting newberry scrubs who dont have free lavs anymore as tankers? omg. no. there are no tankers left. no good ones anyhow. notice how all of them are solo'd by a good aver? In the real world, unsupported armoured vehicles are never solo'd by anti-vehicle weapons. I can't belive the game would be so unbalanced that this would be possible - just another of CCP's failing i'm afraid.
I bet there is some old veterans who would beg to differ. A few have given their life to taking a tank out solo, one has even earned a medal of honor...
Now I don't know about these days for tanks,.. but A navy Seal team did get killed with just a single rocket ( not a tank, but you get my point I hope ) |
Knightshade Belladonna
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
730
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
Karazantor wrote:Knightshade Belladonna wrote:Karazantor wrote:Charlotte O'Dell wrote:wait...so you're counting newberry scrubs who dont have free lavs anymore as tankers? omg. no. there are no tankers left. no good ones anyhow. notice how all of them are solo'd by a good aver? In the real world, unsupported armoured vehicles are never solo'd by anti-vehicle weapons. I can't belive the game would be so unbalanced that this would be possible - just another of CCP's failing i'm afraid. I bet there is some old veterans who would beg to differ. A few have given their life to taking a tank out solo, one has even earned a medal of honor... Now I don't know about these days for tanks,.. but A navy Seal team did get killed with just a single rocket ( not a tank, but you get my point I hope ) Please read my above comment.
please take notice of how I replied seconds after you( I was making a reply ), now I know you weren't serious.. Glad you weren't |
Knightshade Belladonna
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
730
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:33:00 -
[3] - Quote
Charlotte O'Dell wrote:DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Karazantor wrote:Charlotte O'Dell wrote:wait...so you're counting newberry scrubs who dont have free lavs anymore as tankers? omg. no. there are no tankers left. no good ones anyhow. notice how all of them are solo'd by a good aver? In the real world, unsupported armoured vehicles are never solo'd by anti-vehicle weapons. I can't belive the game would be so unbalanced that this would be possible - just another of CCP's failing i'm afraid. That makes no sense. So you say that vehicles that are supported by infantry are able to be destroyed by a single person? I believe you have mixed yourself up. That said, armored vehicles have frequently been disabled and even destroyed by a single person. As recent as the Iraqi war, an Abrams Tank, complete with reactive armor, was disabled by a tandem warhead fired from an RPG. A single AV personnel. One round. okay...disabled does not mean destroyed. more than likely, it destroyed a tread and was a mobility kill, but short of a 500lbd explosive under the tank, nothing can kill it that isn't dropped from the sky. no abrams crewman has ever been killed in their tank. so yeah, the tanks we have now are like Shermans. Advanced should be m60s, and protos should be abrams. an rpg cannot kill an abrams. it has never happened and never will.
no, you can not have a tank immune to swarms |
Knightshade Belladonna
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
730
|
Posted - 2013.07.28 04:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:One of the first anti-tank weapons was a molotov smashed into the engine vents.
~The more you know.
and yeah, my tank can withstand enough ordinance to level a small city(multiple heavy railgun shots which have roughly the capability to level a building in current days, at less than 10GJ. the ones in game are at 80GJ) but an infantry weapon kills me in 3 shots. #CCPlogic
Rail guns are destructable |
|
|
|