Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
ICECREAMK1NG
WARRIORS 1NC
737
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 21:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
Why are you slowly removing the supply depots from the field ?
I am getting fed up of having to call a jeep to drive back to spawn, just to change fits or resupply
'' adapt or die '' or drive back to spawn to adapt. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1228
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 21:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
1 to help give logistics an actual role. 2 to make room for player dropped supply depots. |
Delta 749
Kestrel Reconnaissance
1367
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 21:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
Its the tankers man, they prioritize them so people cant easily get AV out on the field to respond to them |
ICECREAMK1NG
WARRIORS 1NC
737
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 21:10:00 -
[4] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:Its the tankers man, they prioritize them so people cant easily get AV out on the field to respond to them
Yes I know tankers do this. I am talking about CCP reducing the amount over the last two builds. |
Delta 749
Kestrel Reconnaissance
1368
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 21:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
ICECREAMK1NG wrote:Delta 749 wrote:Its the tankers man, they prioritize them so people cant easily get AV out on the field to respond to them Yes I know tankers do this. I am talking about CCP reducing the amount over the last two builds.
Worried about grenade spam maybe? I mean can you imagine how it would be now that we have contact nades if supply depots were all over the place |
Forlorn Destrier
Bullet Cluster
1183
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 21:16:00 -
[6] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:Its the tankers man, they prioritize them so people cant easily get AV out on the field to respond to them
Correct. I've actually seen where doing this helps turn the tide of battle, interestingly enough. |
ICECREAMK1NG
WARRIORS 1NC
737
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 21:23:00 -
[7] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:ICECREAMK1NG wrote:Delta 749 wrote:Its the tankers man, they prioritize them so people cant easily get AV out on the field to respond to them Yes I know tankers do this. I am talking about CCP reducing the amount over the last two builds. Worried about grenade spam maybe? I mean can you imagine how it would be now that we have contact nades if supply depots were all over the place
Then remove the contact grenades, not the bloody supply depots. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. RISE of LEGION
2701
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 21:26:00 -
[8] - Quote
It makes them more valuable as well, 1 supply depot is more important and will be more contested than 2-3 depots. |
ICECREAMK1NG
WARRIORS 1NC
737
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 21:47:00 -
[9] - Quote
gbghg wrote:It makes them more valuable as well, 1 supply depot is more important and will be more contested than 2-3 depots.
Really............ What's that, for the 30 seconds before it's destroyed. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. RISE of LEGION
2702
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 21:51:00 -
[10] - Quote
ICECREAMK1NG wrote:gbghg wrote:It makes them more valuable as well, 1 supply depot is more important and will be more contested than 2-3 depots. Really............ What's that, for the 30 seconds before it's destroyed. As a vehicle user less supply depots mean less people looking for some quick WP, I ain't complaining. |
|
Forlorn Destrier
Bullet Cluster
1183
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 22:00:00 -
[11] - Quote
gbghg wrote:It makes them more valuable as well, 1 supply depot is more important and will be more contested than 2-3 depots.
Truth - it increases points of contact with the enemy, thereby increasing combat. |
Delta 749
Kestrel Reconnaissance
1372
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 22:01:00 -
[12] - Quote
ICECREAMK1NG wrote:Delta 749 wrote:ICECREAMK1NG wrote:Delta 749 wrote:Its the tankers man, they prioritize them so people cant easily get AV out on the field to respond to them Yes I know tankers do this. I am talking about CCP reducing the amount over the last two builds. Worried about grenade spam maybe? I mean can you imagine how it would be now that we have contact nades if supply depots were all over the place Then remove the contact grenades, not the bloody supply depots.
Preaching to the choir man
|
Poplo Furuya
Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation
418
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 22:38:00 -
[13] - Quote
'Die to Adapt' is actually a reasonable course of action sometimes. When on a DU runner I sometimes get the link down in a decent vantage then go into the NeoCom to suicide if a vehicle has emerged and needs immediate forging.
Best time was doing that on the enemy's side of the map after a multi-HAV blitzkrieg resulted in them seizing all points. Snuck past to the rear, placed, suicided. Came in with a Forge behind them along with my squad toting Swarms. Cue a mostly wrecked tank column and the begin of a counter offensive as we took all points nearest the enemy redline while their blob was situated nearer our own, having to break up and double back.
Turned into an even match after that initial blitzing, good game. |
Dust Project 514
Dust 514 Evolved
183
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 23:08:00 -
[14] - Quote
CCP wants us to lose out suits more often, so that we can't spam proto gear and aurum users spend more money. |
ICECREAMK1NG
WARRIORS 1NC
740
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 23:12:00 -
[15] - Quote
Dust Project 514 wrote:CCP wants us to lose out suits more often, so that we can't spam proto gear and aurum users spend more money.
Guess that's why they broke the needle and hoped no one would notice.
The removal of supply depots is a little more subtle I guess. |
Knight Soiaire
Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1349
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 23:15:00 -
[16] - Quote
They're an important installation if you're looking to take out my tank, they could, camp the Depot and spam AV nades, or instantly swap out to an AV suits.
I just cant trust anyone to defend these things, and I'm not betting my 700k ISK tank that some newberry would do a good job at it. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |