The first thing he said that is really worth noting and what I have said myself on comment sections of IGN website on their review of Dust is that...

You can't play this game for two days and have a review. It's impossible. This is something that takes some time to understand or at least you have to dig your heels in order to give an unbiased review of the game.

Some IGN editor got real pissed because I had a difference in opinion. I told him that Dust 514 is just not something you pick up, play for a short while and then write a review. Also it helps to note that so many people are so in fused in their muscle memory and quality of game expectancy due to COD and BF, that they instantly dismiss Dust without knowing why they did so.

Now if you tell them this, they instantly respond back negatively to you. It's like talking with a guy that said Dust is so laggy and had the nerve to say that COD is not laggy. I'm laughed hysterically. Are you crazy?

Dust 514 got plenty of things to work on but by far its the best FPS, IMO, out there that offers so much in terms of its broad scope. Looking at it narrowly will only limit your gaming experience with this sci fi shooter/mmorpg hybrid.

I've played PC, and I've seen plenty of videos of other's playing PC. PC is almost always an uplink spam-fest with a rush to the hill and everyone using the FOTM. The only "strategy" is when two bad teams that don't understand how to do well in PC go up against one another.



nonsense.

First off, I'm not a CoD player. I've played it, but not enough to ever be considered a fan or to give me a reason to "compensate for it's failures." I could easily spin the argument and say that the fact that you think the hit detection and lag in Dust 514 are any better just shows how YOU are conpensating for Dust 514's failures.

I mean really, there's just no comparison. How many players do you see get disconnected or lag out of EVERY SINGLE MATCH in Dust 514? It's a constant and pervasive problem. Anyone who's spent any time with both games is going to laugh at your assessment, because it's a joke.



Hey, if someone disagrees with you, they must be a "troll" amirite? Seriously, grow up.

The "depth" of the meta game could be applied to literally any game ever. You play Dust 514, so you understand it's meta game. If you were a big tiddlywinks player, you would tell us about the depth of the tiddlywinks meta game. If you were a competitive nose picker, you'd tell us about the depth of the nose picking meta game.

Dust 514 is a simplistic and shallow lobby shooter. The only "depth" is that which you fabricate yourself. There's nothing deep or special happening with the game itself, because they aren't doing anything new.

If your argument sucks, and you've got nothing of value to add to the discussion, simply call your opponent a "troll."
Great strategy, it's not transparent at all. /s

I haven't said a single thing that could be deemed trolling. I'm simply refuting the ridiculous arguments you guys are putting forth.

Anyone with even a basic knowledge of FPS can see that Dust 514 is a low-strategy, casual, lobby shooter. Saying such doesn't make me a troll, it just makes me correct.