|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1213
   |
Posted - 2013.07.19 05:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Make this game all passive and you can use this point, until then its completely different.
Why is that? |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1213
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 05:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Sylvana Nightwind wrote:...do all EVE players, all 500.000 of them get a respec?
- Do they petition for it?
- Riot on forums maybe?
And they are even paying monthly sub for their game to accumulate skills. And you have free to play game to get your SP however you want. The breakdown: DUST 514 - Free to play game - Changes 1 thing, everyone goes up in arms about it and wants to reset their character EVE ONline - sub $15 month game - Changes 10 things in expansion - nobody cares and moves on playing as they used to I am not at all a supporter of respecs, but I hate it when people try to play the F2P card. This game is not F2P! There is a $20 a month subscription fee ($5 mor than EVE). if you are not paying the sub, you are doing it wrong, and are probably having a a terrible time of this game.
Wow, so you can't play if you don't spend money.
lol. Grow up. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1215
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 05:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Buster Friently wrote: lol. Grow up Small mind  How did you think that this was going to help your argument in anyway.
You mean the fact that Dust is F2P? Because that's not an argument. So, I think my point is pretty clear. Grow Up. You obviously don't know how F2P works.
I think the rest of us understand it pretty well though, just not you I guess. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1215
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 05:34:00 -
[4] - Quote
Syther Shadows wrote:ZDub 303 wrote:Make this game all passive and you can use this point, until then its completely different. if dust was full passive then there would be no incentive to play for the top tier players they would just afk until they are needed
Fully passive SP would actually solve the AFK scourge.
Why would they AFK? There would be no point. Passive SP would be a nice change to Dust. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1215
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 05:36:00 -
[5] - Quote
Syther Shadows wrote:Cosgar wrote:Dale Templar wrote:Killar-12 wrote:Cosgar wrote:You should have seen the rage induced over the Battleship nerf. It makes the Dust forums look civil. Good Point but are EVE forums ususally like this? In EVE they have riots. Actual riots. ^On the forums, in-game, and via cyber warfare. There's a reason why CCP hasn't disclosed the server's location... (hint) under a iceland bar somewhere
The UK actually. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1216
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 05:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Buster Friently wrote: lol. Grow up Small mind How did you think that this was going to help your argument in anyway. You mean the fact that Dust is F2P? Because that's not an argument. So, I think my point is pretty clear. Grow Up. You obviously don't know how F2P works. I think the rest of us understand it pretty well though, just not you I guess. No your just being childish and pointing a finger at me and calling me a child, and completely ingnoring the point I've made, which is a very valid point: If you're not paying the sub more than likely (by a huge margin) you are not enjoining this game. Here let me demonstrate if we can get 20 people to come to this thread in the next hour and say (honestly) that they do not by boosters, or at no point have, and that they feel that they are enjoying this game as much as anyone who uses boosters, then I'll concede my point.
Well, I'm sorry, but you are being a child.
The point of any business is to make money.
Also, even in passive SP alone, players can earn something like 4.2 mil SP since the game went open beta, close to twice that if they play to their cap, so, 8 or 9 mil Sp seems pretty doable without boosters. I'm sure they're doing fine.
Point is, the game is F2P. You tried to be all pithy by suggesting that someone "pulled the F2P card" Which was childish of you because that's what Dust is - F2P.
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1216
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 05:58:00 -
[7] - Quote
Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Small mind How did you think that this was going to help your argument in anyway. You mean the fact that Dust is F2P? Because that's not an argument. So, I think my point is pretty clear. Grow Up. You obviously don't know how F2P works. I think the rest of us understand it pretty well though, just not you I guess. No your just being childish and pointing a finger at me and calling me a child, and completely ingnoring the point I've made, which is a very valid point: If you're not paying the sub more than likely (by a huge margin) you are not enjoining this game. Here let me demonstrate if we can get 20 people to come to this thread in the next hour and say (honestly) that they do not by boosters, or at no point have, and that they feel that they are enjoying this game as much as anyone who uses boosters, then I'll concede my point. Well, I'm sorry, but you are being a child. The point of any business is to make money. Also, even in passive SP alone, players can earn something like 4.2 mil SP since the game went open beta, close to twice that if they play to their cap, so, 8 or 9 mil Sp seems pretty doable without boosters. I'm sure they're doing fine. Point is, the game is F2P. You tried to be all pithy by suggesting that someone "pulled the F2P card" Which was childish of you because that's what Dust is - F2P. You keep pointing that finger man  it's just making you look stupid man. Now go troll somebody else.
Wow, you're right, I am making you look stupid. Sorry. That's kinda rude of me. What was your astute point again? Oh yeah. That Dust isn't F2p. he. hehehe. oops  |
|
|
| |
|