DUST Search - Respec Petition

pierce Hawkeye wrote:

DJINN leukoplast wrote:

Watched lowrates vid, and I agree with him. If they nerf a weapon, suit, module, etc, the player should get all the SP back from whatever it is CCP "adjusted".

Although seeing as how hard it was for them to apply the last repec, it seems highly unlikely they would have the manpower or will to be able to refund SP based on gear they have adjusted. If something as 'simple' as resetting a players SP to 100% unallocated is tough, there is not a chance in hell they can do it for more specific amounts of SP from a given weapon/suit/etc.

Would be amazing though if they could pull this kind of repec off, as a nerf wouldn't mean wasted WP and it would give us a chance to try something else (perhaps the variety this game needs after you have fully speced into something).

even iff they managed that respec of certain items i would still be happy happen to be skilled into the callogi and it's getting a bit bigger of a nerf then we thought(standard -20cpu, adv -28cpu proto -40cpu plus the change of the racial bonus) but i do agree with you unfortunatly i don't think they have the man power to be that percise with respecting.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
DJINN leukoplast Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 826	Posted - 2013.07.23 05:31:00 - [1] - Quote Watched lowrates vid, and I agree with him. If they nerf a weapon, suit, module, etc, the player should get all the SP back from whatever it is CCP "adjusted". Although seeing as how hard it was for them to apply the last repec, it seems highly unlikely they would have the manpower or will to be able to refund SP based on gear they have adjusted. If something as 'simple' as resetting a players SP to 100% unallocated is tough, there is not a chance in hell they can do it for more specific amounts of SP from a given weapon/suit/etc. Would be amazing though if they could pull this kind of repec off, as a nerf wouldn't mean wasted WP and it would give us a chance to try something else (perhaps the variety this game needs after you have fully speced into something).
DJINN leukoplast Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 833	Posted - 2013.07.24 01:05:00 - [2] - Quote pierce Hawkeye wrote: DJINN leukoplast wrote: Watched lowrates vid, and I agree with him. If they nerf a weapon, suit, module, etc, the player should get all the SP back from whatever it is CCP "adjusted". Although seeing as how hard it was for them to apply the last repec, it seems highly unlikely they would have the manpower or will to be able to refund SP based on gear they have adjusted. If something as 'simple' as resetting a players SP to 100% unallocated is tough, there is not a chance in hell they can do it for more specific amounts of SP from a given weapon/suit/etc. Would be amazing though if they could pull this kind of repec off, as a nerf wouldn't mean wasted WP and it would give us a chance to try something else (perhaps the variety this game needs after you have fully speced into something). even iff they managed that respec of certain items i would still be happy happen to be skilled into the callogi and it's getting a bit bigger of a nerf then we thought(standard -20cpu, adv -28cpu proto -40cpu plus the change of the racial bonus) but i do agree with you unfortunatly i don't think they have the man power to be that percise with respecting. I had a feeling the 20 CPU off the std suit was just a percentage. Shield nerf would have been more than enough to balance the suit, now I am likely going to have a hard time running more than 1 equipment, which makes my logi suit even more like an assault suit (well, a gimped assault suit). Good going you CCP turkeys
DJINN leukoplast Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 834	Posted - 2013.07.24 05:40:00 - [3] - Quote xLTShinySidesx wrote: They already did this once before, when they adjusted the skill multiplayer on the dropsuits they refunded the excess sp so I know that they can in fact give us back the sp for "balanced" items. That is the only type of "respec" I would approve of. That's right, I remember that. So it is possible!