|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Fiddlestaxp
TeamPlayers
EoN.
199
   |
Posted - 2013.07.17 23:37:00 -
[1] - Quote
Your team employs the same tactics. Escalation is a ***** |
Fiddlestaxp
TeamPlayers
EoN.
199
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 00:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote:Your team employs the same tactics. Escalation is a ***** lol we use em only if they are used against us and as far as i know not every SI member has specced into them. But please continue your scrubbyness. When they get their "significant changes" then most of you scrubs are helpless anyway.
If you only use them against people who use them against you, then maybe you would agree to a flaylock cease fire like we had with Hellstorm.. We already have proved that we can honor such agreements. Either way, between your talk and aiding the enemy (giving districts and stacking with loi//kujo) you have mad a few people unhappy. You should have a talk with sha about setting your district timers earlier.
Core flaylock/fused ban for your matches against teamplayers (y/n))? |
Fiddlestaxp
TeamPlayers
EoN.
201
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 03:31:00 -
[3] - Quote
Fiddlestaxp wrote:The dark cloud wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote:Your team employs the same tactics. Escalation is a ***** lol we use em only if they are used against us and as far as i know not every SI member has specced into them. But please continue your scrubbyness. When they get their "significant changes" then most of you scrubs are helpless anyway. If you only use them against people who use them against you, then maybe you would agree to a flaylock cease fire like we had with Hellstorm. We already have proven that we can honor such agreements. Either way, between your talk and aiding the enemy (giving districts and stacking with loi//kujo) you have made a few people displeased. You should have a talk with sha about setting your district timers earlier. Core flaylock/fused ban for your matches against teamplayers (y/n)?
I want an answer dark cloud. |
Fiddlestaxp
TeamPlayers
EoN.
209
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 16:12:00 -
[4] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:To all RND:
You want to know why this isn't worth any more attention after my post? He said we agreed to a no flaylock agreement. When in fact, the agreement was made between LOI. Even if there was an agreement made....last time I checked, SI is in Cronos.
Not to mention, a number of players in the match on SI were using flaylock pistols from the moment they touched down.
Not to mention, we only had 2 flaylock users...in that match. I believe assert was running shotgun but could have used it as a secondary. So, if 2 plus 2 tankers equals 16 (whole team) then someone failed him at math really early.
Lastly, he made this post because I blocked him and he couldn't cry to me any more after his first pm to me. So, now he's looking for a place to vent. So, allow him to be ridiculous on these forums and vent with these silly statements. Cause in conclusion, they had more flaylocks than us, started using them at first spawn, no agreement was made with them and this little boy is the only one who cries.
No more attention is needed...let him go see a shrink for that. lol i thought this agreement would work aswell for other competetive corps. Well appearently not but hey keep going with your scrubbyness. But meh i dont blame you cause EON got every competition threat eliminated by allowing them to join EON.
Still waiting on an answer. Best be quick, you are going to have a lot of matches soon and might not have time to run your mouth on the forums. |
|
|
| |
|