DUST Search - The Great War, Actual Sourced Results.

Dengru wrote:

ER-Bullitt wrote:

OK forum warriros, lets get this **** straight and be done with it...

Loose definintion of the term "ringer" from dictionary.com

"especially be a dead ringer for "resemble closely," 1891, from ringer, a fast horse entered fraudulently in a race in place of a slow one (the verb to ring in this sense is attested from 1812), possibly from British ring in "substitute, exchange," via ring the changes, "substitute counterfeit money for "

Fielding a FULL team from another corp does not define picking up "ringers".

If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it is not red star.. it is a full team of Outer Heaven.

You didnt have the players online to play your own battle, too many timers, we understand. Just dont come to the forums claiminig one thing when in actuality you did another.

I'm sure I can speak for everyone in ML when I say "bring it on". We want good fights, win or lose, we are ready to play.

Well at first I thought you were trying to be provocative, but now I see you are a bit sour. Grezkev is being honest... ask 187, SI or anyone about how many ringers we use. Maybe you and Hawkin weren't made privy to the strategy your leaders were playing at by making us have double timers, and such complete caught agasp at the response. You can be mad at us and misrepresent things to the greater community all you want, but really who cares...


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. League of Infamy 88	Posted - 2013.07.16 19:06:00 - [1] - Quote Grezkev wrote: Heavy Breaks wrote: Pombe Geek wrote: Heavy Breaks wrote: How did RS get on tonight? I got called out on business, I'm a sucker for the monies. Double conflicting timers, I believe OH took a ML attack. won Sweet. Flipped a district, I believe it was ML. As far as if we fight our own battles, we fight our battles with 95%+ RS. I certainly don't see that out of the people who attack us. So.... I personally dont give a hoot who is on the other team, I am just glad to be a part of this amazing war and great battles win or lose. But in the 2 PC matches yesterday that were supposedly against "Red Star"... there was only 1 red star member on the opposing side, in each of the battles. We had one overlapping timer where we also called in ringers, but at least we had more than one of ours guys in the game. So quit with the BS. 1/16 = 6.25% ... not 95%. Where did you learn math, on the back of a cracker jack box? Hope to see you guys on the battlefield again some day.. I felt our first few matches against full Red Star vs. full ML were pretty balanced and good fights. Last night we got stomped by teams made up of half TP/Synergy, and a full Outer Heaven squad with 1 red star guy. After that it was Outer Heaven mostly with a squad of Phoenix.
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. League of Infamy 88	Posted - 2013.07.16 19:30:00 - [2] - Quote Dengru wrote: Guys, really, lets not forum war. I am not sure what your corps intentions were with deliberately causing us to have timers overlapping within minutes of eachother, but if you are gonna do slick things like that, can you complain about how we respond? Not complaining or insinuating a forum war, lets get that straight. My comment was directly towards Grezkev claiming they fight ALL of their battles with 95% Red Star personel, which last night proved to be completely false. Yes there was one overlapping timer, but you still brough 93% ringers.... In fact, lets say your red star guy was the ringer for TP/Syn and Outer Heaven... I understand you need at least one of your guys in the fight to let your big brothers in to fight for you :) Thats the last of it, it is very cut and dry.. no drama, no tears.. See you (hopefully you and not your big brothers, but we will fight them too if it comes down to it) on the battlefield. Cheers.
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. League of Infamy 88	Posted - 2013.07.16 19:34:00 - [3] - Quote OK forum warriros, lets get this **** straight and be done with it... Loose definintion of the term "ringer" from dictionary.com "especially be a dead ringer for "resemble closely," 1891, from ringer, a fast horse entered fraudulently in a race in place of a slow one (the verb to ring in this sense is attested from 1812), possibly from British ring in "substitute, exchange," via ring the changes, "substitute counterfeit money for " Fielding a FULL team from another corp does not define picking up "ringers". If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it is not red star.. it is a full team of Outer Heaven. You didnt have the players online to play your own battle, too many timers, we understand. Just dont come to the forums claiminig one thing when in actuality you did another. I'm sure I can speak for everyone in ML when I say "bring it on". We want good fights, win or lose, we are ready to play.
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. League of Infamy 89	Posted - 2013.07.16 19:41:00 - [4] - Quote Z3R0 GR4VITY wrote: ER-Bullitt wrote: OK forum warriros, lets get this **** straight and be done with it... Loose definintion of the term "ringer" from dictionary.com "especially be a dead ringer for "resemble closely," 1891, from ringer, a fast horse entered fraudulently in a race in place of a slow one (the verb to ring in this sense is attested from 1812), possibly from British ring in "substitute, exchange," via ring the changes, "substitute counterfeit money for " Fielding a FULL team from another corp does not define picking up "ringers". If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it is not red star.. it is a full team of Outer Heaven. You didnt have the players online to play your own battle, too many timers, we understand. Just dont come to the forums claiminig one thing when in actuality you did another. I'm sure I can speak for everyone in ML when I say "bring it on". We want good fights, win or lose, we are ready to play. Umm...okay? I thought we were going to put the forum stuff to rest and let our guns do the talking in the matches tonight? Exactly.
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. League of Infamy 89	Posted - 2013.07.16 19:46:00 - [5] - Quote Dengru wrote: ER-Bullitt wrote: OK forum warriros, lets get this **** straight and be done with it... Loose definintion of the term "ringer" from dictionary.com "especially be a dead ringer for "resemble closely," 1891, from ringer, a fast horse entered fraudulently in a race in place of a slow one (the verb to ring in this sense is attested from 1812), possibly from British ring in "substitute, exchange," via ring the changes, "substitute counterfeit money for " Fielding a FULL team from another corp does not define picking up "ringers". If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it is not red star.. it is a full team of Outer Heaven. You didnt have the players online to play your own battle, too many timers, we understand. Just dont come to the forums claiminig one thing when in actuality you did another. I'm sure I can speak for everyone in ML when I say "bring it on". We want good fights, win or lose, we are ready to play. Well at first I thought you were trying to be provocative, but now I see you are a bit sour. Grezkev is being honest... ask 187, SI or anyone about how many ringers we use. Maybe you and Hawkin weren't made privy to the strategy your leaders were playing at by making us have double timers, and such complete caught agasp at the response. You can be mad at us and misrepresent things to the greater community all you want, but really who cares... Meh.
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. League of Infamy 89	Posted - 2013.07.16 20:41:00 - [6] - Quote Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: ooh snap! you got served son! 0.5/10 ... half point awarded for using two exclamation points because thats just snarky
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. League of Infamy 97	Posted - 2013.07.17 08:15:00 - [7] - Quote Tectonious Falcon wrote: What is this? The big bad TeamPlayers turn up and suddenly you turn to jelly? Have you ever fought TP in a PC battle before? I think I would rather shoot myself in the **** than instigate that fight.