DUST Search - Agreement to not use flaylock and fused...

DJINN leukoplast wrote:

Xero The Mishima wrote:

DJINN leukoplast wrote:

Xero The Mishima wrote:

Just because a gun is a Flavor of the month and effective doesn't mean you have to stoop down low like rats and use it. You could still maintain a shred of dignity and win against the bums depending on it... Like we do :)

So not one single TP player used a contact nade or a flaylock?

We use because you have to fight fire with fire. Do we use regularly and as a primary. HELL NO! We don't need to depend on a crutch. However those flaylocks and contact nades are too OP you have to fight them back by using them. Specially when a entire alliance depends on them to remain competitive.

So TP speced into flaylocks purely as a defense mechanism?

And I dunno, I find it quite satisfying to take out flayers with a properly cooked nade, sounds like you guys needed a vice just to keep up instead of giving HS a gool ol' fashioned beating with skill-weapons.

Big question remains... if you guys didn't resort to OP noob weaponry, would you have won? Or is fighting fire with fire your only means of success?


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers EoN. 189	Posted - 2013.07.13 09:56:00 - [1] - Quote DJINN Kujo wrote: ZDub 303 wrote: agreement not to use crutch OP weapons... All I've got to say this is... lol I hope nobody takes this post seriously... there is no way you will get all 32 people to agree to this. This is essentially smoke and mirrors to try and get EoN to use them less so you can pull a quick and underhanded win. Cause you know we would win if we allowed this to go through. So what your telling me, is that if Eon. corporations win their matches against Hellstorm, it's because they simply use OP weapons to do so? Don't even start. You guys spam Core Flaylock and fused nade just as bad as anyone I've seen. Don't try to act like you don't. I don't trust you to follow through on this, because it is the only thing that keeps you in the game.
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers EoN. 189	Posted - 2013.07.13 12:25:00 - [2] - Quote So listen. We talked about this before the first match, there was rumblings of a "no flaylock/fused honor rule". I was pretty skeptical. We had a few guys switch fits to SMG... That lasted about until you captured B and there was just straight CFP spam. A few of our guys that use it as a side arm switched back, because if including Blizz the Lion on your roster wasn't a clear indication of intent, the kill feed was. There are a few of you that stuck to their guns. Broadway and Kalente are two of them(mad respect as well). Soul is not. At least it took him one match to switch from balac's to core flaylock. I personally have 1 fit with fused locus, ended up throwing 2, and they got me 1 kill. I'm sorry to the guy I gibbed with it. Might have been you kalente. I don't believe the majority of your team would give up CFP/fused... Why would you? The number of guys that use CFP on your team vastly outnumbered those on ours. And it was very effective. And when we have fought SI and OH, they were very effective with CFP as well. Why would you give up your most effective weapon and receive only a minor benefit through our discontinued use? I don't believe it for a second. Making an honor pact that can only result in YOUR team doing worse... You brought Blizz the Lion to both battles and then have the audacity to proclaim that WE over utilize the core flaylock? Either this is a ploy to get the very few of us who decided to fight fire with fire to switch to less effective weapons, even for one death OR There are excuses being made. This isn't the least bit directed at those of you who resist the cheese. You know who are.
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers EoN. 189	Posted - 2013.07.13 12:30:00 - [3] - Quote DJINN leukoplast wrote: Xero The Mishima wrote: DJINN leukoplast wrote: Xero The Mishima wrote: Just because a gun is a Flavor of the month and effective doesn't mean you have to stoop down low like rats and use it. You could still maintain a shred of dignity and win against the bums depending on it... Like we do :) So not one single TP player used a contact nade or a flaylock? We use because you have to fight fire with fire. Do we use regularly and as a primary. HELL NO! We don't need to depend on a crutch. However those flaylocks and contact nades are too OP you have to fight them back by using them. Specially when a entire alliance depends on them to remain competitive. So TP speced into flaylocks purely as a defense mechanism? And I dunno, I find it quite satisfying to take out flayers with a properly cooked nade, sounds like you guys needed a vice just to keep up instead of giving HS a gool ol' fashioned beating with skill-weapons. Big question remains... if you guys didn't resort to OP noob weaponry, would you have won? Or is fighting fire with fire your only means of success? You brought Blizz the Lion to the match. If that doesn't signal your intent to Core Flaylock spam, I don't know what would. "GUYS, ITS GONNA BE A GOOD CLEAN MATCH, NO FLAYLOCK!" Blizz the Lion has joined the battle... Yeah alright, I believe you.
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers EoN. 190	Posted - 2013.07.14 05:25:00 - [4] - Quote ++++ Men of their word. I think I've seen 1 or 2 fused locus kills and 0 flaylock today. The games are 100% more enjoyable and I apologize for doubting you.