|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
473
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 08:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
Signed. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
475
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 12:43:00 -
[2] - Quote
Im persomally happy with std and adv AV balance against us but its the lack of true proto tanks and mods that make us like paper thin against pro av . Thats the imbalance if we got our proto havs and not more sub standard adv havs we would see the balance. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
475
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 12:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Im persomally happy with std and adv AV balance against us but its the lack of true proto tanks and mods that make us like paper thin against pro av . Thats the imbalance if we got our proto havs and not more sub standard adv havs we would see the balance. omg finally someone that understands what im talking about
God iv been screeming this since the start of uprising and the removal of the marauders. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
475
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 12:48:00 -
[4] - Quote
daishi mk03 wrote:Would it be okay if Mad&Gunn became the prototype tanks and we add two weaker / cheaper Std and Adv versions of both?
My clone just face palmed and shot him self after reading this. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
488
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 12:07:00 -
[5] - Quote
Harpyja wrote:I support. I just want tanks to not get soloed by proto AVers anymore. With so much proto AV now, we are no longer a challenge but simply juicy WPs. Give us some love, especially shield tanks. We need a lot of love!
We all know that the only way we shall stand a chance against proto av is with the return of the marauders or even the introduction of proto HAVs. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
488
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 12:17:00 -
[6] - Quote
Sotapopthegrey gay wrote:Dear CCP I am a hopeles waste of life and have managed to fail I everything I have ever attempted to achieve. So I am now going to come on here and vent my frustration on thus verry forum . I am going to lamely attempt to troll threads that reach beiond my intalectual prowess. Once I am done trolling I am going to shove my controll pad so far up my own arse ill be able to taste whats left of the ooz that I seep from every pore on my body. Then finally I am goi g to go roll up in the fetal position and cry myself to sleep
Wow dude you have some serious issues. I can recomend a food therapist if you like.
|
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
489
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 15:27:00 -
[7] - Quote
CharCharOdell wrote:Sotapopthegrey gay wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Sotapopthegrey gay wrote:Dear CCP I am a hopeles waste of life and have managed to fail I everything I have ever attempted to achieve. So I am now going to come on here and vent my frustration on thus verry forum . I am going to lamely attempt to troll threads that reach beiond my intalectual prowess. Once I am done trolling I am going to shove my controll pad so far up my own arse ill be able to taste whats left of the ooz that I seep from every pore on my body. Then finally I am goi g to go roll up in the fetal position and cry myself to sleep Wow dude you have some serious issues. I can recomend a food therapist if you like. I didn't write that, but you've got tankers down to a tee. How many times u been banned? I'm at 2 :)
CCP loves my posts hence iv never been banned no matter how much I try |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
556
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 22:52:00 -
[8] - Quote
Stinker Butt wrote:Alpha 443-6732 wrote: How condescending of you. Maybe we should just turn all vehicles into dropsuits so we can have a sick 1v1 420 quickscope match! Why have teamwork right guys? We should water down gameplay so much that diversity is thrown out of the window!
Thinking like this is why this game is devolving more and more into just another infantry only arena shooter. Vehicles are seriously a joke at their current state in any serious competitive playing environment.
I'm sorry if I seem condescending. You know as well as I do that there is no teamwork in pub matches. Making a claim that "there's supposed to be," doesn't make it happen. You can't get people to squad up, let alone cooperate. Why should AVers have to use teamwork when tankers dont? Take the top 10% of tankers, and average out how many tanks they lose a match. My guess is it's somewhere between 0 and 1, probably closer to 0. If CCP actually listens to you guys and buffs tanks while nerfing everything that can oppose them, the top tankers will be impossible to kill. PS: I don't really know what the average tank loss is, I can only guess from the few great tankers that I know.
Personally I can play all day in the same tank and not loose one but some days you have a run of vad games and can losse a tank on every battle pending on resistanse from the opposition. Loosing 1 tank every 3 games will make a tanker bankrupt eventually as we dont profit from our tanks till the 4th or 5th gameso if we loose one we are really out of pocket. Its a bit different loosing a tank compaird to a dropsuit .we shoild be hard to kill we drive tanks for christ sake. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
572
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 15:15:00 -
[9] - Quote
The Attorney General wrote:Jesus you guys are petty. Substitute Marauder for proto in his statement if you need to feel better.
You refuse to debate someone without them using your terms, so that you can highlight what you consider to be your plight.
I am starting to understand why Blam committed seppuku, just to get away from you guys.
^^ claims to be a tanker but takes an infantry sided view. Face palm. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
573
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 16:28:00 -
[10] - Quote
daishi mk03 wrote:pegasis prime wrote:^^ claims to be a tanker but takes an infantry sided view. Face palm. Criticising someone for looking at a topic from different point of views and being open minded. I don't want to live on this planet anymore. Right now, one proto AV player doesn't pose a threat and can be killed alone, two AV guys force you to retreat and might kill you (depends on you), three have good chances to kill you and four AV player seal your fate. -> Perfectly fine. AV guys have to run around with sidearm vs your normal infantry (forget about Commando suits).
Im sorry what planet are you on?? Proto av not standing a chance lol your as high as I am. And tge atoury there has dissagreed with every other tanker I know. And dont give me the av not standing a chance against infantry because they are restricted to a side arm . I melt plenty of mercs with my toxin smg and I know many av players who are better than some assaults at getting killswith their side arm. |
|
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
579
|
Posted - 2013.07.16 16:25:00 -
[11] - Quote
daishi mk03 wrote:I took the breach version to show, that not even this thing can three-hit you, of coz it is crap, immobilizing for 6 sec means death to railgun. Learn to retreat and trust your mates to handle av.
Dude I used to solo sagis and suyrias last build with the dcma breech . That was when tanks were allot harder to kill . If your using the breech the trick is to get behind the tank and hit the sweet spot. If a tank sees you when your using the breeh your doing it wrong.
|
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
588
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 10:16:00 -
[12] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:The Attorney General wrote:pegasis prime wrote:
Dude I used to solo horribly driven sagis and suyrias last build with the dcma breech .
Fixed that for you. Seriously, if any tank driver is going to let you hit them in the ass 4 times then they deserve to die. Doubly so if they allow you to immobilize yourself for 4.5 seconds between each shot. Bad tactics will erase any advantage a good vehicle gives you. How is that fixed? The tank driver has no option, he can get hit even if hes moving and trying to find cover Use OP swarms and cover isnt enough because they follow you around it half the time while being invisible so you dont know where he is FG can be the same, get hit from the side and infact the marker is wrong and hes behind you Using proto AV any tank can be easily killed without much effort and its a fact
Dude ask mr jason person how scary I was with the breech models. Trust me when I say I only used the breech on deacent pilots the crap pilots I used to take on with the assault varients. Honestly dude the breech is evil. 1 dcma breech pluss 2 complex dammage mods hitting the sweet spot on a sagi lost you 6000 shields in 1 shot. If I was placed correctly av nades would finish the tank off when they tryed to retreat in my direction.
|
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
588
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 12:30:00 -
[13] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Mary Sedillo wrote:TakeCover OrDie wrote:Mary Sedillo wrote:If you think the only way for a gunnlogi to beat an armor blaster tank is rail, you are sad. Missile turrets can SHRED one if you engage them first and outside of its blaster range while backpedaling. Sheesh. Fail. Yea....you obviously haven't been in a real p/c fight against good tankers if you think puny gunn with missles can still destroy madrugars I have been in a pc fight with them, and a GOOD user of missiles can send a blaster madrugar running -IF- you engage him at range. You WILL die if you engage at his range or within easy sprint distance. THINK, DAMNIT! All of you pansies who want CCP to spoon feed ya! You think armor has it EASY in PC either? Hell no! Almost the entire other side consists of some proto level explosive AV and the cleverness to use tactics to take you out. Its no walk in the park for us either, -BUT- I don't cry for an "iWin" button when I lose. No. Stop. Missiles are lulzy against Good Tankers I thought I signed this but /signed just to make sure :D
Yip the only maddys iv melted with my missiles have obviously been less skilld pilots . That being said proto accelerated missiles have the highest alpha dammage out of all the large turrets .
|
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
589
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 16:10:00 -
[14] - Quote
The Attorney General wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
2 or 3 lol worthy, i take it fit would be heavy rep, 180 best plate and 3 resists and highs maybe DC2, remember tho with 10% armor resist the mods start with a stacking penalty so the DCU add overall maybe 2/3% and the 3rd active resist mod is about 8% roughly - it maybe able to handle one but 2 would push it and 3 overkill most likely espc with swarms with the usual 2 damage mods maybe more
If they wanted to nerf the standard tanks for proto tanks then you reduce the PG off of the tank instead of nerfing the skill, thats easier instead of taking off the skill completely and replacing it with a useless bonus
If you use a DCU you are doing it wrong. It completely nullifies your second carapace hardener. Waste of a slot that could be better filled with something else. I want to explain a concept to you, and hopefully this will help you to see things from a different perspective. When you have skills that increase certain attributes you invariably create stronger vehicles based on SP levels. This results in people with more SP in a role having higher success rates versus those with lower SP. In the case of infantry, this can be worked around through skill, such that a MLT dropsuit always has some chance, however small of beating a proto. In vehicles it is not the same. If I have 25% more PG than a 2 million SP tanker, there is almost nothing they can do to me to compensate for that other than run like hell and recall their tank to avoid losing it. Not very fun at all. Not easy to learn with, and forcing a tanker to go to infantry because someone with more SP showed up is not in any way balanced. As it is right now, what divides the gear between tankers is how much you can fit into the hull based off of your SP. So even though SP plays a role, it is not as dramatic as if your tank can fit a whole different league of tank, gank or both. Not all things are about the infantry vs vehicles argument, sometimes it is about new tankers versus long term guys. The fact that I can handle one proto AV in my STD tank is balanced. Lets all wait patiently for our next tier of vehicles, while we also work on getting the enforcers turned into something useful.
The problem you describe is a match making problem and of course a vehicle with less sp is less survivable thats the point in investibg your sp.
|
|
|
|