Hi guys,

Thanks for all your input. Here are some quick points:
- I'm looking at adjusting PG and CPU values, however this is a bit of a big effort so keep that in mind since this will also include re-evaluating PG/CPU costs of all vehicle modules as well and this of course will require an extensive amount of testing.
- we are aware of the issues with turrets. this is going to require some code support and some further feature development to get that out there for you. We're looking at what would be a reasonable deployment plan for you on our end since streaming content (meshes, value changes) is a completely different thing than uploading code changes.
- The Gallente HAVs are intentionally quicker and nimbler than the Caldari HAVs as this is a racial characteristic between the two races. Initially, this was the wrong way around because of an optimization to the physics wheel configuration on these HAVs. Don't forget, at the end of the day that armor tanking is going to reduce the propulsion of an HAV, something which the Gallente HAV is more aligned to.

so only one thing for HAVs? how long is our class going to wait for the vehicle lock?

I knew this was a joke post, but part of me still got excited. then that excitement turned into sadness. now anger

SoxFour for Vehicle Team, he communicates more.

SoxFour for EVERYTHING!

No thanks.

Foxtard and his team trutards can't even get PC working right.

yeah all we get is a warning of when swarmers are locking onto us... thats really lame, srly we dont need that tankers have "adapted" and are avoiding swarmers without this warning. This is hardly useful for shield tanks at all, what a let down. Whats worse is this is months old. 2 months? disappointing. plz let us respec out of tanks, its obvious you ppl @ CCP dont care about us