DUST Search - Dust 128 VS 128..... Would it really be fun??

All Channels

General Discussions

Dust 128 VS 128..... Would it really be fun??

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
ChromeBreaker SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 872	Posted - 2013.07.11 13:56:00 - [1] - Quote New content will help with certain aspects of larger fights... transport vehicles, jets, AA tanks, new orbitals, Orbital deployed equipment... When you get bigger you have to have the tools to manage it. Atm coms break down after about 30 people... Commander rolls, multiple MCC's.... squad, team, platoons, company, brigades? When your fighting larger numbers, the game has to match it... I would LOVE to see a 64 v 64 domination match Zerg?... choke points, new weapons, tanks, artillery, orbitals... 128 v 128? attack and defence? force them to spilt up or have the chance of being taken out in one go?
ChromeBreaker SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 872	Posted - 2013.07.11 14:02:00 - [2] - Quote Marston VC wrote: ChromeBreaker wrote: New content will help with certain aspects of larger fights... transport vehicles, jets, AA tanks, new orbitals, Orbital deployed equiptment... When you get bigger you have to have the tools to manage it. Atm coms break down after about 30 people... Commander rolls, multiple MCC's.... squad, team, platoons, company, brigades? When your fighting larger numbers, the game has to match it... I would LOVE to see a 64 v 64 domination match Wait...... common sense???? WAHHHHHHHHH????? I dance too
ChromeBreaker SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 872	Posted - 2013.07.11 14:16:00 - [3] - Quote Marston VC wrote: ChromeBreaker wrote: Marston VC wrote: ChromeBreaker wrote: New content will help with certain aspects of larger fights... transport vehicles, jets, AA tanks, new orbitals, Orbital deployed equiptment... When you get bigger you have to have the tools to manage it. Atm coms break down after about 30 people... Commander rolls, multiple MCC's.... squad, team, platoons, company, brigades? When your fighting larger numbers, the game has to match it... I would LOVE to see a 64 v 64 domination match Wait...... common sense???? WAHHHHHHHHH????? I dance too dance like these GUYS??? I just feel the Groove Anyway.... cough....On topic... When it gets to Zerg levels i am a firm believer that the game and map layout are key, the objective of the match has to be such as to break up the blob, force them to split up. Unless of course the IDEA is just a massive mash up crash... but then everyones expecting it lol
ChromeBreaker SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 872	Posted - 2013.07.11 14:38:00 - [4] - Quote Marston VC wrote: ChromeBreaker wrote: Marston VC wrote: ChromeBreaker wrote: Marston VC wrote: Wait...... common sense???? WAHHHHHHHHH????? I dance too dance like these GUYS??? I just feel the Groove Anyway.... cough....On topic... When it gets to Zerg levels i am a firm believer that the game and map layout are key, the objective of the match has to be such as to break up the blob, force them to split up. Unless of course the IDEA is just a massive mash up crash... but then everyones expecting it lol Lol fair enough, im not sure how exactly one breaks up a zerg fest without high explosives though...... (and any more boomfesting in this game would break it) so yeah.... Well a kill the base type of objective concentrates everything into a specific area... what if it was "like" skirmish but instead of 5 null cannons, there were 5 areas of 5 null cannons? sure you could zerg but you'd leave the other objectives open...
ChromeBreaker SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 872	Posted - 2013.07.11 14:54:00 - [5] - Quote Marston VC wrote: Quote: Well a kill the base type of objective concentraits eveything into a specic area... what if it was "like" skirmish but instead of 5 null cannons, there were 5 areas of 5 null cannons? sure you could zerg but you'd leave the other objectives open... again..... that implies the knowledge of science is known to the development team! No.... your right, hopefully they make a better PC game mode eventually, cuz right now its not good :/ having equal footing as someone who supposed to be defending compared to the attacker is just silly in my opinion! Attacking/Defending means nothing if its all equal lol. Give the defenders a big wall to hide behind, a load of emplacements and half clones Or 128 v 128... you only get 1 clone... DOmination with multiple MCC's that are controlled...

Copyright © 2013-2024, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,03s, ref 20241110/1510
EVE-Online™/DUST514™ and EVE/DUST514 imagery © CCP.

bitcoin: 1CHRiBBArqpw5Yz7x5KS2RRtN5ubEn5gF

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.