Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Scheneighnay McBob
Blueberry Gunners
2192
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 17:13:00 -
[1] - Quote
Reduce the frame/module prices for dropships and HAVs significantly. While I can easily turn a profit with a decent LAV fit, one death with a decent dropship or HAV sets you back a ton of battles worth of ISK.
If the costs are lowered, we'll see more vehicles. If we see more vehicles, we'll see more AV, because AV will finally be viable WP. |
CLONE117
Planetary Response Organization
29
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 18:26:00 -
[2] - Quote
ive seen plenty of vehcile run from me as i shoot them with a mlt swarm.
i have also been in plenty of battles where every1 on the enemy team is using a dang tank..
i would like a dropship that can easily kill those tanks.... or an av artillery vehicle |
CLONE117
Planetary Response Organization
29
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 18:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
...i would like cheaper vehicles modules and turrets though... |
Scheneighnay McBob
Blueberry Gunners
2192
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 18:32:00 -
[4] - Quote
CLONE117 wrote:ive seen plenty of vehcile run from me as i shoot them with a mlt swarm.
i have also been in plenty of battles where every1 on the enemy team is using a dang tank..
i would like a dropship that can easily kill those tanks.... or an av artillery vehicle A really well set up assault dropship can down an HAV. Also, we're eventually getting artillery, but railgun HAVs are good enough anti-tank right now.
I've never seen a completely tank-dependent team for several builds. However, I seen 1 skirmish and 1 ambush OMS turn into a ridiculously huge LAV battle. I'm talking about everyone having a gunner, and LAVs exploding everywhere you look. I LOVE it when that happens! |
CLONE117
Planetary Response Organization
29
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 18:59:00 -
[5] - Quote
i would have brougth out a crb7 swarm if i was in that battle |
Gorra Snell
BetaMax. CRONOS.
50
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 19:07:00 -
[6] - Quote
+1 to the OP. Current pricing makes you use your vehicles in a very precious way that's pretty contrary to 'fun'. That, in turn, is less fun for AVers. |
ALPHA DECRIPTER
M.E.R.C. Conventional Forces D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
47
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 20:50:00 -
[7] - Quote
This won't happen as CCP want's you to think twice about using vehicles. I would prefer fewer tanks and cars but more dropships (or at least good pilots using the few that show up) as it seems so under used. Running people over should net you fewer WP while team actions should grant you more (no rep wp? wth?) and no change, of course, to turret kills but better acting turrets would be nice.
Hmm I might be getting off topic so i'll stop here. |
Aizen Intiki
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
136
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 21:43:00 -
[8] - Quote
the need to drop the isk price of the turrets back to normal (they 2x'ed the price in Uprising). Although they planned on "lowering" the price of vehicles, they made them higher.
Peace, Aizen |
Vell0cet
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
59
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 21:55:00 -
[9] - Quote
Gorra Snell wrote:Current pricing makes you use your vehicles in a very precious way that's pretty contrary to 'fun'. It makes it more like real life, where people don't want to die. That's one of the things that makes the New Eden universe so unique and fun is that gameplay is much more realistic since losses hurt badly. If losses don't hurt, then people will just spam vehicles like in other FPS games with nothing to loose and combat is much less tactical as a result. It's a great feeling when you kill someone's expensive ship, especially if they had just killed one of your expensive suits earlier.
A big NO to this idea. |
Hunter Fencen
ROGUE SPADES EoN.
30
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 21:57:00 -
[10] - Quote
Aizen Intiki wrote:the need to drop the isk price of the turrets back to normal (they 2x'ed the price in Uprising). Although they planned on "lowering" the price of vehicles, they made them higher. Peace, Aizen Sorry this is getting to me can you stop copying godin mate, its unoriginal |
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Blueberry Gunners
2195
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 22:44:00 -
[11] - Quote
ALPHA DECRIPTER wrote:This won't happen as CCP want's you to think twice about using vehicles. I would prefer fewer tanks and cars but more dropships (or at least good pilots using the few that show up) as it seems so under used. Running people over should net you fewer WP while team actions should grant you more (no rep wp? wth?) and no change, of course, to turret kills but better acting turrets would be nice.
Hmm I might be getting off topic so i'll stop here. They want you to think twice about using anything- not just vehicles. |
Scheneighnay McBob
Blueberry Gunners
2195
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 22:44:00 -
[12] - Quote
Aizen Intiki wrote:the need to drop the isk price of the turrets back to normal (they 2x'ed the price in Uprising). Although they planned on "lowering" the price of vehicles, they made them higher. Peace, Aizen I have a 300,000 ISK Scout LAV. Half of the cost is the turret. |
Aizen Intiki
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
137
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 22:58:00 -
[13] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Aizen Intiki wrote:the need to drop the isk price of the turrets back to normal (they 2x'ed the price in Uprising). Although they planned on "lowering" the price of vehicles, they made them higher. Peace, Aizen I have a 300,000 ISK Scout LAV. Half of the cost is the turret.
it's a quarter of the cost on my HAV's. NObody asked for it, but it happened. Just like nobody aked for the constant CPU?PG nerfs, and constant changes to our skills (although, some of the turret skills needed to be changed) |
Aizen Intiki
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
137
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 23:00:00 -
[14] - Quote
Hunter Fencen wrote:Aizen Intiki wrote:the need to drop the isk price of the turrets back to normal (they 2x'ed the price in Uprising). Although they planned on "lowering" the price of vehicles, they made them higher. Peace, Aizen Sorry this is getting to me can you stop copying godin mate, its unoriginal
Read this, think about it, let it sink in....... |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |