I can't really speak to much on the inter-alliance politics of district trading vs. successful prosecution of the CRONOS war vs. ringer requirements vs. overextension. But at the risk of future opportunities, from my perspective internal to IO, I'll also say I'm disappointed in the EoN. leadership. With respect, because he has built an incredible alliance, Mavado is at this point an absentee alliance leader who has publicly stated this game is dead in October. He hasn't communicated anything to the alliance as a whole in months - the maps change, wars start and end, new corps join and no one really knows about it until we see them in Alliance chat and wonder who the heck they are. It's fixable, but worth noting. I'll concede that some of this failure likely falls on the heads of IO leaders who should have filled that gap, including Deadeyes. Perhaps it is because I was in IO and everyone else was getting the memos but we weren't because of leadership relations with Nik. But it is what it is.

Agreed on Nikia's faults.

"This" being the ultimate decision to burn IO to the ground is on Deadeyes. The bitterness and failed alliance relations are on Nik. EoN. leadership did what they had to do, but it could have been handled differently. Will 'Gravity Prone' get those districts now that they're out of Nikia's grasp? Doubtful because they've already been handed off to a myriad of other corps. Just sayin. No hard feelings, just laying out what I'm seeing. People outside the corp are cheering for Deadeyes, so thought I'd share my perspective.

You see Mav every day because he is your corp CEO. I just want a weekly bulletin or something. Macro-level alliance-wide comms have just sucked. That's really beside the point honestly. Probably shouldn't have brought it up as it's a bit off topic. /shrug

well everyone knows me and my revenge i usually do pretty well at it