Non constructive? None of it good idea actually.

But expect to be trolled for this though.

On another note: the ehp of all dropsuits were flattened because many were upset about the prototype suits being too powerfull so I'm not quite sure ccp would be willing to change them again *shrugs*

It's a pretty good idea I feel why should I run something that cost 300k that can be one shotted by just about anything.

Exactly. 3x may be too much, but in a game where we actually own what we are using and lose it if we die, there really isn't much room for quick deaths to be allowed.

Then be careful when you jump out of the MCC. This is New Eden, don't use what you can't afford to lose.

Then be careful when you jump out of the MCC. This is New Eden, don't use what you can't afford to lose.

I do only use what I am prepared to lose, that doesn't change the fact that it's silly that when you lose it, you lose it within one second of getting shot.

I do only use what I am prepared to lose, that doesn't change the fact that it's silly that when you lose it, you lose it within one second of getting shot.

Exactly. 3x may be too much, but in a game where we actually own what we are using and lose it if we die, there really isn't much room for quick deaths to be allowed.

Actually quick deaths is what we need, if this was a twitch shooter like other FPS where you can die in 3-4 shots, and dying actually costs you something this would be the most tactical game ever where staying with your group and role focusing will actually matter for once.

I play scout dose that count?

No because scouts are severely UP and its rather unfair for them.

No offence but -1 very bad idea,

If we have 3 time the amount of health we have not it would requirer 3 times more abuse to kill someone which right now we are bullet sponges anyway, imagine a fight between 2 average proto guys lol it would take 2 or 3 mags just to kill one if they dont run away.

Higher hit points point would make long to medium range marksmanship completely useless and it would just become a deterrent or area denial as when someone shoots at someone they have more than sufficient time to run away to cover the entire game would be reduced to CQC.

Caldari assault with AR/SMG vs Amarr Assault with ScR/ScP, who would win?

3x might be too much but fights should last longer. If I want to die within 3 seconds I play CoD.

Depends on the situation who sees who first what positions people are in, what range they are at, if one is moving while the other is standing still too many variables to give a 100% accuraate verdict, if both parties are of same skill lets go with average at close range then the caldari will win due to his use of full auto weapons, if hit point at times 3 then the amarr assualt will never win due to the point that his gun is more suited for long range and with that much hp it is easy to close range.