|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
IgniteableAura
Pro Hic Immortalis
League of Infamy
37
   |
Posted - 2013.07.08 19:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
Leither Yiltron wrote:It's not a scam, EON. just want renters, similar to the pets that LoI recently picked up (PHI, War Ravens, 187.).
KEQ, at it again.  Going to burn ROFL to the ground with your ignorance and inability to keep friends. |
IgniteableAura
Pro Hic Immortalis
League of Infamy
38
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 21:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
Alaika Arbosa wrote:
You should've used an alt man, this just makes it look like the serf is standing up for the master.
We stand behind our words, so no alt is necessary. "Hiding" behind an alt........that would portray ones weakness and servitude. Hiding among the bushes is the handiwork of a coward.
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."
|
IgniteableAura
Pro Hic Immortalis
League of Infamy
50
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 20:08:00 -
[3] - Quote
Alaika Arbosa wrote:
While I appreciate the integrity, I too will stand by my words. It really appears as though the organgrinder starts his music and out jumps the monkey to defend his masters honor.
There has to be something going on that we don't know about. PHI and PFB are both better than pets, yet why do they vassal themselves to a rental alliance? It just doesn't make sense to me. Most of the self-proclaimed elite corps think scrub when they think of me (hell, even those who were being "carried" in 2010 think the same), yet I haven't been like "ooooh, ooooh, I can haz rental district pleeeeze!!!!".
Scrubs are renters and renters are scrubs, no matter if in Space or on a Planet, simple as.
I know you guys want more than just a Blueberry Muffin of renters and their overlord (at least I'm hoping), I just don't know why you decided to take the ***** way out and pledge fealty to someone who only wants to profit from you.
In response to your quote, if ships aren't built for being safe in port, why'd you dock up with renters?
You can't be a renter if A) You aren't paying for the space you "rent" B) Already own the space when you join up.
There is always a curtain that hides the true meaning/value. That's something you will just have to figure out for yourself. Free cookies are a luxury that I don't provide.
Riddle me this, why wouldn't the safer bet be to join up with EON? |
IgniteableAura
Pro Hic Immortalis
League of Infamy
55
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 04:34:00 -
[4] - Quote
Circular argument is circular. Too many fallacies to bother. Good day sir.
Appreciate your high regard. o/ |
IgniteableAura
Pro Hic Immortalis
League of Infamy
57
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 03:10:00 -
[5] - Quote
Buzzin Fr0g wrote:MlDDLE MANGEMENT wrote:
I just find it funny that anyone in KEQ could call any of those groups pets. Each and everyone of those corps could stomp out KEQ from the map and not even break a sweat doing it.
.
Nope, none of those corps could. We were 50% W/L against PHI in 8v8, and have destroyed 187 and War Ravens in both 8v8 and 16v16 - So much so they had to bring in half a team of ringers from HS to make it competitive. You and the rest of the cretins need to know there are only 3 corps right now that can consistently beat us - Hellstorm, TP, and IE. That's it. We've played pretty much everyone else, and beaten them.
Sorry mate but I count 5 total battles we have done. You won a single. So thats 20% W/L |
IgniteableAura
Pro Hic Immortalis
League of Infamy
59
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 16:37:00 -
[6] - Quote
Buzzin Fr0g wrote:IgniteableAura wrote:Buzzin Fr0g wrote:MlDDLE MANGEMENT wrote:
I just find it funny that anyone in KEQ could call any of those groups pets. Each and everyone of those corps could stomp out KEQ from the map and not even break a sweat doing it.
.
Nope, none of those corps could. We were 50% W/L against PHI in 8v8, and have destroyed 187 and War Ravens in both 8v8 and 16v16 - So much so they had to bring in half a team of ringers from HS to make it competitive. You and the rest of the cretins need to know there are only 3 corps right now that can consistently beat us - Hellstorm, TP, and IE. That's it. We've played pretty much everyone else, and beaten them. Sorry mate but I count 5 total battles we have done. You won a single. So thats 20% W/L I counted 4 and was in two that were won, one that was lost. The other I heard we had lost. That's 50%. Even if it was 5 that's still 40%, which could hardly be called a "stomping" as Middle put it. No disrespect to PHI as I know you guys are a solid corp, but I needed to clarify this as so many fools on these forums have turned to underestimating KEQ because we lost many battles to arguably the best corp atm. Losing to #1 doesn't mean we can't thrash 99% of Dust corps. ?
We also were 100% (1:0) against PFBHz.......doesnt mean we would have won all battles against them. The battles I am counting are 2 in December, 2 in Feb and 1 in March. The battle KEQ won, was in Feb and T-Brown owned the field with his tank.
Anyway none of that matters because when you friendly scrim you usually are trying to develop new players. So I never really count those battles as a true judgement of skill. |
|
|
| |
|