|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Buzzin Fr0g
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
115
   |
Posted - 2013.07.12 02:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
MlDDLE MANGEMENT wrote:
I just find it funny that anyone in KEQ could call any of those groups pets. Each and everyone of those corps could stomp out KEQ from the map and not even break a sweat doing it.
.
Nope, none of those corps could. We were 50% W/L against PHI in 8v8, and have destroyed 187 and War Ravens in both 8v8 and 16v16 - So much so they had to bring in half a team of ringers from HS to make it competitive. You and the rest of the cretins need to know there are only 3 corps right now that can consistently beat us - Hellstorm, TP, and IE. That's it. We've played pretty much everyone else, and beaten them. |
Buzzin Fr0g
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
115
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 06:21:00 -
[2] - Quote
IgniteableAura wrote:Buzzin Fr0g wrote:MlDDLE MANGEMENT wrote:
I just find it funny that anyone in KEQ could call any of those groups pets. Each and everyone of those corps could stomp out KEQ from the map and not even break a sweat doing it.
.
Nope, none of those corps could. We were 50% W/L against PHI in 8v8, and have destroyed 187 and War Ravens in both 8v8 and 16v16 - So much so they had to bring in half a team of ringers from HS to make it competitive. You and the rest of the cretins need to know there are only 3 corps right now that can consistently beat us - Hellstorm, TP, and IE. That's it. We've played pretty much everyone else, and beaten them. Sorry mate but I count 5 total battles we have done. You won a single. So thats 20% W/L
I counted 4 and was in two that were won, one that was lost. The other I heard we had lost. That's 50%. Even if it was 5 that's still 40%, which could hardly be called a "stomping" as middle put it. No disrespect to PHI as I know you guys are a solid corp, but I needed to clarify this as so many smacktards on these forums have turned to underestimating KEQ because we lost many battles to arguably the best corp atm. Losing to #1 doesn't mean we can't thrash 99% of Dust corps.
? |
Buzzin Fr0g
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
117
|
Posted - 2013.07.14 02:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
IgniteableAura wrote:Buzzin Fr0g wrote:IgniteableAura wrote:Buzzin Fr0g wrote:MlDDLE MANGEMENT wrote:
I just find it funny that anyone in KEQ could call any of those groups pets. Each and everyone of those corps could stomp out KEQ from the map and not even break a sweat doing it.
.
Nope, none of those corps could. We were 50% W/L against PHI in 8v8, and have destroyed 187 and War Ravens in both 8v8 and 16v16 - So much so they had to bring in half a team of ringers from HS to make it competitive. You and the rest of the cretins need to know there are only 3 corps right now that can consistently beat us - Hellstorm, TP, and IE. That's it. We've played pretty much everyone else, and beaten them. Sorry mate but I count 5 total battles we have done. You won a single. So thats 20% W/L I counted 4 and was in two that were won, one that was lost. The other I heard we had lost. That's 50%. Even if it was 5 that's still 40%, which could hardly be called a "stomping" as Middle put it. No disrespect to PHI as I know you guys are a solid corp, but I needed to clarify this as so many fools on these forums have turned to underestimating KEQ because we lost many battles to arguably the best corp atm. Losing to #1 doesn't mean we can't thrash 99% of Dust corps. ? We also were 100% (1:0) against PFBHz.......doesnt mean we would have won all battles against them. The battles I am counting are 2 in December, 2 in Feb and 1 in March. The battle KEQ won, was in Feb and T-Brown owned the field with his tank. Anyway none of that matters because when you friendly scrim you usually are trying to develop new players. So I never really count those battles as a true judgement of skill.
My point is that when we have our "A team" we can at least keep it competitive with the majority of the Dust corpbase. Too many people have looked at our losing streak against Hellstorm (punctuated by a few wins I might add!) and relegated us to the status of complete push-over corporation. It's a gross underestimation.
|
|
|
| |
|