| Pages: [1]  :: one page | 
      
      
      
        | Author | 
        Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) | 
      
      
      
          
          Zekain K 
          Expert Intervention Caldari State
  185
  
          
                | 
        Posted - 2013.07.07 17:12:00 -
          [1] - Quote 
          
           
          The camera resets to its default mode after the first lock, which makes it difficult to try to lock onto multiple targets
 
  The lock on time feels like it takes way too long when in a battle.
  You immediately lose your lock when your target breaks your Los. Personally, I think this needs to be tweeked so you have a few seconds to let you re establish your Los. Sort of like a message that says.
  "Losing lock on I'n 5 seconds, regain line of sight to sustain lock on." | 
      
      
      
          
          Gorra Snell 
          BetaMax. CRONOS.
  20
  
          
                | 
        Posted - 2013.07.07 17:22:00 -
          [2] - Quote 
          
           
          As much as I like the concept of the current implementation, it's just far too slow and unwieldy to use in a game as fast-paced as an FPS. I've never accomplished anything legitimately useful with it. Gained a few WP, yeah, but never when it mattered to an actual firefight. I'm afraid it needs a complete redesign. | 
      
      
      
          
          XXfootnoteXX 
          DUST University Ivy League
  378
  
          
                | 
        Posted - 2013.07.07 17:29:00 -
          [3] - Quote 
          
           
          Gorra Snell wrote:As much as I like the concept of the current implementation, it's just far too slow and unwieldy to use in a game as fast-paced as an FPS. I've never accomplished anything legitimately useful with it. Gained a few WP, yeah, but never when it mattered to an actual firefight. I'm afraid it needs a complete redesign.  
  I have said it before and will say it again, it needs to be like the triage nanohives. No locking on, just activate it. You get inside the bubble and you get healed. Simple as that. | 
      
      
      
          
          Zekain K 
          Expert Intervention Caldari State
  185
  
          
                | 
        Posted - 2013.07.07 17:37:00 -
          [4] - Quote 
          
           
          XXfootnoteXX wrote:Gorra Snell wrote:As much as I like the concept of the current implementation, it's just far too slow and unwieldy to use in a game as fast-paced as an FPS. I've never accomplished anything legitimately useful with it. Gained a few WP, yeah, but never when it mattered to an actual firefight. I'm afraid it needs a complete redesign.  I have said it before and will say it again, it needs to be like the triage nanohives. No locking on, just activate it. You get inside the bubble and you get healed. Simple as that.   May e there should be 2 types. 1 like the one we have now, but with some better handling. Another one like the triage nano hive, but with a much larger area of affect. | 
      
      
      
          
          shaman oga 
          Nexus Balusa Horizon DARKSTAR ARMY
  254
  
          
                | 
        Posted - 2013.07.07 17:42:00 -
          [5] - Quote 
          
           
          Here is my old post, another problem is that is impossible to fit a heavy remote repairer without sacrificing a lot of protection for us. I'm for a healing radius around the HAV. I would like to play as a support vehicle, but for the moment it's not possible, i would like to sacrify my main turret and turn my HAV in a defensive HAV. But that's not the way it should go, we need a new class of vehicles something like a Logistic HAV without the heavy turret.
  Edit: remotes should repair everything in their range not only other vehicles. | 
      
      
      
          
          XXfootnoteXX 
          DUST University Ivy League
  379
  
          
                | 
        Posted - 2013.07.07 17:42:00 -
          [6] - Quote 
          
           
          Zekain K wrote:XXfootnoteXX wrote:Gorra Snell wrote:As much as I like the concept of the current implementation, it's just far too slow and unwieldy to use in a game as fast-paced as an FPS. I've never accomplished anything legitimately useful with it. Gained a few WP, yeah, but never when it mattered to an actual firefight. I'm afraid it needs a complete redesign.  I have said it before and will say it again, it needs to be like the triage nanohives. No locking on, just activate it. You get inside the bubble and you get healed. Simple as that.  May e there should be 2 types. 1 like the one we have now, but with some better handling. Another one like the triage nano hive, but with a much larger area of affect.  
  I would be happy with two, one where you have to aim so you can do vehicle repairs, and other other like the triage, where it has an area of effect. | 
      
      
      
          
          XXfootnoteXX 
          DUST University Ivy League
  379
  
          
                | 
        Posted - 2013.07.07 17:44:00 -
          [7] - Quote 
          
           
          shaman oga wrote:we need a new class of vehicles something like a Logistic HAV without the heavy turret.  
  Now this I could get behind.
  I hate the fact you have to have all the turrents installed as is. If we could not install the main, or the two small guns, that would open up a whole new roll. | 
      
      
      
          
          Gorra Snell 
          BetaMax. CRONOS.
  21
  
          
                | 
        Posted - 2013.07.08 03:07:00 -
          [8] - Quote 
          
           
          +1 for Logi HAV with AoE healing. The LLAV still needs a reworked repping mechanic, though...adding a LHAV won't help that problem, just give us more options.
  For that matter, just add a repping small turret to the game...solve the problem for LLAV, and fit them on Logi Dropships...would help resolve some of the general dropship malaise. | 
      
      
      
          
          DUST Fiend 
          OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
  4583
  
          
                | 
        Posted - 2013.07.08 03:08:00 -
          [9] - Quote 
          
           
          I'm against having it work in a radius for the simple fact that I use my LAV as a mobile cover platform.
  I'm getting an LLAV for the added durability, being able to pop the rep as I hop out....GG. | 
      
      
        |   | 
          | 
      
      
      
        | Pages: [1]  :: one page | 
      
      
      
        | First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |