Ninjanomyx
Internal Error.
League of Infamy
85
   |
Posted - 2013.07.06 21:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
OMFG..........IWS just QUIT already. You are so f***ing irrelevant it actually makes me physically ill everytime you type/speak. You aren't a presence ingame, you have no idea what you are talking about when it comes to just about ANYTHING, and what little "Information" you provide is often misinformation & regurgitated misdirection. You are CCPs f***ing lap dog..... Whatever BS PR Spindig they fecal toss your way you immediately gobble it down & drool out the leftovers for the "Community".
From a Tactical Standpoint you often only see the Size/Shape of the Avatar before an Engagement. You then decide to Shoot or Run based upon the presented Scenario. The Color of the Suit & details of the "Skin" are often the last thing on your mind in a heated firefight, you simply Fight or Flight. And if you had enough time to stare at the Nipple Rings or Crotch Curvature of a Dropsuit for "Tactical Purposes" then you probably had enough time to ADS & read the Analysis/Scan of the ACTUAL DATA, which is far more informative as it contains all of the Data you need at a glance (& is extremely simple to add in).
Placeholders are hardly expensive.... You slap a Color (Or don't, who cares) on a Dural Suit & give it Stats & Slots, a Name, & an Skill Node to sink SP into & viola, new f***ing Dropsuits. Modeling is not needed so the Art Department can take their sweet ass time playing Dress-up or making New Models for New Content (MTAC, Jet, etc) & then play the Crayola Game w/ the Skins afterwards. I mean....are you seriously this dunce & blind of a Fanboy Pet that you defend this POS excuse??? I take it as yes....you are.
Placeholders allow for there to be room to breathe while the Community enjoys Critiquing & Metagaming the **** out of their new toys. Stat Balancing can be done @ a proper pace w/ more Community Involvement as we will have gained experience with the Synergies berween the Variants, thus allowing better informed Balancing Discussions at an accelerated pace. What we have now is a Logistical mess with no Balance while slow trickles of New Suits are thrown into the mix. Commando Suit, Pilot Suit, Weapons, hell even Modules & Equipment that are NEW are being introduced.....yet the Core Variants are left on the backburner.
This now excessively elongates the Balancing Duration & forces a significant chunk of the already burnt-out Community to remain Spec'd into something that is so far off of their chosen Career Path only to retain relevance on the Battlefield. Anyone who hoardes SP for 3 Years, remaining at the bottom of the "Food Chain" & being barred from Competitive Play, still clinging onto "Hope" as they live to be PUBstomped while eagerly awaiting their desired Fitting to be made.....is a Masochistic Blind Fanboy Freerunner. So not only do these ignoramus not contribute to the Developers/Producers/Directors/Etc. (& if they do...they are further gone mentally for Paying to Wait). they also attemp to derail Valuable Discussions by claiming those who don't follow their Mantra of what they call "Patience" to be deserving of wasting their SP.
So not only will introducing Placeholders, promptly followed by a Respec, be significantly more Cost Effective in the long run.....it also frees up Developmental Effort/Time that may further focus on Core & Balancing, allows a feeling of Near-Completion/Variety which boosts Community Morale & Player Retension, prevents a feeling of immediate need for Respec & Reinbursement in the future, & generally enables more valuable Well-Informed Discussions now rather than "SoonGäó". But what the hell do I know.....I haven't had my nasal cavity so far up the rectal orifice that I can smell last week's dinner :P |
Ninjanomyx
Internal Error.
League of Infamy
87
|
Posted - 2013.07.07 01:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
ladwar wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Changing their colors is expensive? Bro, I could do it on Paint. Item creation and then removal is probably more expensive. are you talking about the art department making the models? because last time i checked, removal is free its creating them that cost money. placeholders shouldn't be all the costly since that is the simple part. oh BTW 50$ says the pilot models look just like the rest of the scout models and they are toying with vehicle users because all that is really needed is to code their bonuses in which i am betting is done already and has been. and no one in CPM or CCP uses vehicles to any real use other then to get from point A to point B then recall it never to be used again in that match so that is why its not getting pushed like it should.
100% agree. I'd push to replace Copper Puppy Butterknife with myself for CPM.....but alas I have no Computer & am incapable of placing phallis upon my oral when CCP want pacification. Sabre, your FAIL is not in that you haven't tried....it's that you have given up altogether & simply accept what you hear like a f***ing sheep. NDA & BS aside you provide the least resistance, the worst information, the weakest effort, the lowest experience (Gameplay & Function), & have shown the worst Track Record among the CPM.....& that says a lot considering you are right down there w/ Jenza, but at least she has "Pants" that provide her a spot on the Council as Comic Relief 
At the very least you give credit where it is due (Noting Kane & Nova Knife), & I respect that, but Cheerleading, Sidelining, & providing horrible suggestions & misinformation for ALL Roles (As far as I've read) only further diminishes your "Value" as our Representative. Either cut the umbillical cord & poke that beehive with a stick of honey or bow out gracefully & let a less complacent entity replace you for the sake of this title. And please.....for the love of God, think before you type. When your "Suggestions" are 1/2 a**ed and malformed, ESPECIALLY if it is out of your AoE (Area of Expertise), it only makes you look that much more useless. Do your Homework, HTFU or GTFO  |