|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
SENATOR KODOS
Absentee AFK Regiment
228
   |
Posted - 2013.07.06 02:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
Im not saying PS2 is amazing because its not.
But to say Dust is even close is lolable.
Delusion runs deep on this forum. |
SENATOR KODOS
Absentee AFK Regiment
228
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 02:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Tectonious Falcon wrote:Seriously though PS2 is a bad game. It's borderline pay to win, poorly optimised and runs like a piece of ****, it's a boring campfest, every man and his dog has an aimbot, there's no goal, meaning or end game - I could go on forever.
As much as I hate Dust, I would rather play it because I have more faith in CCP than SoE. Recently CCP has made a move in the right direction.
everyone has aimbot hahahaha |
SENATOR KODOS
Absentee AFK Regiment
228
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 02:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tectonious Falcon wrote:
People think Dust runs poorly - wait until they see PS2.
You havent played it then or have a welfare computer so your opinion is null.
It has ALOT more player and runs way better than dust.
|
SENATOR KODOS
Absentee AFK Regiment
228
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 02:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
Seamie Schmoove wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Im not saying PS2 is amazing because its not.
But to say Dust is even close is lolable.
Delusion runs deep on this forum. Creating so many alts for the purpose of this is lolable.... Find a hobby lad
Like I said complete delusion on this forum.
|
SENATOR KODOS
Absentee AFK Regiment
228
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 03:08:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tectonious Falcon wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Tectonious Falcon wrote:
People think Dust runs poorly - wait until they see PS2.
You havent played it then or have a welfare computer so your opinion is null. It has ALOT more player and runs way better than dust. Graphics card: GTX 690 Processor: Intel core i7-3770 3.4 GHz quad core, 8 threads. OS: Windows 7 Ultimate RAM: 16 gb ddr3 RAM Might not be the most impressive but enough to run PS2
Ya thats about the same as mine.
The odd part is you saying that PS2 runs poorly compared to Dust.
We both have a PS3 which is identical.
We both have similar comps.
I dont think PS2 has great gameplay and im not a fanboy.
But Dust runs like garnage and PS2 doesnt.
Not to mention PS2 has how many players and dust has 12 on 12.
Not trying to fanboy war but to say it runs worse than Dust is odd. |
SENATOR KODOS
Absentee AFK Regiment
228
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 03:15:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tectonious Falcon wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Tectonious Falcon wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Tectonious Falcon wrote:
People think Dust runs poorly - wait until they see PS2.
You havent played it then or have a welfare computer so your opinion is null. It has ALOT more player and runs way better than dust. Graphics card: GTX 690 Processor: Intel core i7-3770 3.4 GHz quad core, 8 threads. OS: Windows 7 Ultimate RAM: 16 gb ddr3 RAM Might not be the most impressive but enough to run PS2 Ya thats about the same as mine. The odd part is you saying that PS2 runs poorly compared to Dust. We both have a PS3 which is identical. We both have similar comps. I dont think PS2 has great gameplay and im not a fanboy. But Dust runs like garbage and PS2 doesnt. Not to mention PS2 has how many players and dust has 12 on 12. Not trying to fanboy war but to say it runs worse than Dust is odd. You're right, I should have phrased it better- Dust runs terribly and PS2 runs averagely, but can be unpredictable and the frame rate may tank in large battles.
Agreed.
|
|
|
| |
|