DUST Search - Vehicle queue ins.

All Channels

General Discussions

Vehicle queue ins.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
FIRST TESTDUMMY Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State 6	Posted - 2013.07.04 01:56:00 - [1] - Quote I propose that the maximum amount of vehicles allowed directly relate to seats available and the total number of players on a team. If a team has 11 players, the number of HAVs, LAVs, or DSs should have a total of 11 seats or less, but not any higher. For example: -Team Blueberry begins the match with 11 players. -The maximum amount of LAVs that can be called in should equate to 3: the total amount of seat positions available being 9 (3 seats available per LAV) -1 other player joins the Blueberries later on in the match -The total number of vehicles allowed now should equate to 12 seats, thus enabling an extra LAV to be called in. -4 players, for whatever reason leave the match -The total number of LAVs allowed should then drop to 2 What do you think?
TheAmazing FlyingPig Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 1315	Posted - 2013.07.04 01:57:00 - [2] - Quote I think that free LAV's were a mistake and need to be removed.
Skihids Tritan's Onslaught RISE of LEGION 1689	Posted - 2013.07.04 01:57:00 - [3] - Quote I think that's stupid.
Cody Sietz Tritan's Onslaught RISE of LEGION 356	Posted - 2013.07.04 02:00:00 - [4] - Quote Skihids wrote: I think that's stupid. Its not that bad. I think lavs and havs should bot count toward dropships.
Princeps Marcellus Expert Intervention Caldari State 76	Posted - 2013.07.04 02:01:00 - [5] - Quote TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: I think that free LAV's were a mistake and need to be removed. I agree.
Iblis Jihad BIG BAD W0LVES Eternal Syndicate 0	Posted - 2013.07.04 02:01:00 - [6] - Quote A lot of thinking going on here.
Kane Fyea DUST University Ivy League 568	Posted - 2013.07.04 02:04:00 - [7] - Quote TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: I think that free LAV's were a mistake and need to be removed. I believe they have a speeder bike type of thing in the making. When that's finished CCP will very likely remove the free LAV and replace it with that.
FIRST TESTDUMMY Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State 7	Posted - 2013.07.04 02:16:00 - [8] - Quote I promise that this proposal does not force you to throw coins at a node canon: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=90877 This new idea could work, right?
Skihids Tritan's Onslaught RISE of LEGION 1689	Posted - 2013.07.04 03:57:00 - [9] - Quote So someone calls in a STD dropship with 6 seats and two others call in LAVs and that's it for the entire team? Or two folks call in a HAVs and two more call in LAVs and everyone else has to walk? That's lame.
FIRST TESTDUMMY Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State 7	Posted - 2013.07.04 04:05:00 - [10] - Quote Skihids wrote: So someone calls in a STD dropship with 6 seats and two others call in LAVs and that's it for the entire team? Or two folks call in a HAVs and two more call in LAVs and everyone else has to walk? That's lame. Really? I think that is a fair amount. Instead of lone tankers or solo pilots, vehicles can be utilized more for team play.

Spkr4theDead Namtar Elite Gallente Federation 250	Posted - 2013.07.04 04:12:00 - [11] - Quote lolno Spec out for AV. Stop looking for a solution to a non-existent problem.
Delta 749 Kestrel Reconnaissance 716	Posted - 2013.07.04 04:16:00 - [12] - Quote FIRST TESTDUMMY wrote: Skihids wrote: So someone calls in a STD dropship with 6 seats and two others call in LAVs and that's it for the entire team? Or two folks call in a HAVs and two more call in LAVs and everyone else has to walk? That's lame. Really? I think that is a fair amount. Instead of lone tankers or solo pilots, vehicles can be utilized more for team play. Implying vehicle players want to be included with infantry Hell, as bad as they are the only LAVs I see that will actually slow down and load up other players are the free ones
Sgt Buttscratch G I A N T EoN. 333	Posted - 2013.07.04 04:36:00 - [13] - Quote My idea is queing the most expensive items in 1st, then letting a 15 second window pass than free items may be called
Maken Tosch DUST University Ivy League 3017	Posted - 2013.07.04 05:34:00 - [14] - Quote Sounds like a good idea on paper but I wonder if it holds any practicality on the battlefield. What about speeders (aka hover bikes) when they get implemented? They have 1 seat. Once they get into the game and a team has 16 players, then you will see 16 speeders going in becoming the next murder taxi to troll the battlefield.
Spkr4theDead Namtar Elite Gallente Federation 250	Posted - 2013.07.04 05:53:00 - [15] - Quote Sgt Buttscratch wrote: My idea is queing the most expensive items in 1st, then letting a 15 second window pass than free items may be called Does that mean terrible Enforcers get called in before mainline Madrugars?
13th Clone The Merc Net 4	Posted - 2013.07.04 06:29:00 - [16] - Quote Restrict free lav to 5 requests or 5 lav's meaning if u recall it you can call it back in per person really 5 each in game should be enough for its normal intended purpose of transporting .
Xocoyol Zaraoul Zumari Force Projection Caldari State 543	Posted - 2013.07.04 06:31:00 - [17] - Quote So a single dropship would then utterly destroy anyone's hopes of calling in additional vehicles? A dropship is seven seats, after all. Also, I don't see why I, an HAV pilot, have to be further penalized by the idiotic free LAV spam. Your suggestion to nerf LAV spams would penalize everyone, this is killing a fly with a shotgun.
FIRST TESTDUMMY Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State 9	Posted - 2013.07.04 06:36:00 - [18] - Quote Maken Tosch wrote: Sounds like a good idea on paper but I wonder if it holds any practicality on the battlefield. What about speeders (aka hover bikes) when they get implemented? They have 1 seat. Once they get into the game and a team has 16 players, then you will see 16 speeders going in becoming the next murder taxi to troll the battlefield. EDIT: What about fighters? Aren't those 1-seat vehicles as well? Imagine the skies swarming with them. But the scenario you present is very unlikely, is it not? What are the chances that an entire team of 16 will each have specced into bikes and fighters? What about the players that will still opt to get their Madrugars and LLAVs out. If one Python is queued in, 6 or so available seat positions are effectively taken out, thus making the scenario a little more balanced as opposed to 16 total bikes. However, I will agree with you in that the idea does look good on paper, but may lack practicality as of now. I'm sure that my proposal can be tweaked and refined. My only intention was to offer a solution to the constant rants on murder taxis, but it seems that very few want to offer any suggestions other than: No free LAVS!
Aizen Intiki Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack 33	Posted - 2013.07.04 06:37:00 - [19] - Quote FIRST TESTDUMMY wrote: I promise that this proposal does not force you to throw coins at a node canon: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=90877 This new idea could work, right? hell no.
Cy Clone1 Ill Omens EoN. 33	Posted - 2013.07.04 06:42:00 - [20] - Quote let your team have as many vehicles as they want. put your cognitive thinking into more important issues sir.

Aizen Intiki Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack 36	Posted - 2013.07.04 06:44:00 - [21] - Quote Maken Tosch wrote: Sounds like a good idea on paper but I wonder if it holds any practicality on the battlefield. What about speeders (aka hover bikes) when they get implemented? They have 1 seat. Once they get into the game and a team has 16 players, then you will see 16 speeders going in becoming the next murder taxi to troll the battlefield. EDIT: What about fighters? Aren't those 1-seat vehicles as well? Imagine the skies swarming with them. 2-seat, and I imagine that 75-80% of people that aren't even pilots will get ROFL stomped by the real pilots, in any vehicle, or crash a lot, and then would go bankrupt in a day. Then would complain that they suck even though all good pilots know better, and would either 1: ask for a buff 2: ask for a respec Nither would happen, and it would be funny as **** Peace, Aizen
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 595	Posted - 2013.07.04 10:06:00 - [22] - Quote OP is an idiot If i call in a dropship that is 7seats gone I want no vehicle limits, the more the merrier


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.