Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
FIRST TESTDUMMY
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 01:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
I propose that the maximum amount of vehicles allowed directly relate to seats available and the total number of players on a team.
If a team has 11 players, the number of HAVs, LAVs, or DSs should have a total of 11 seats or less, but not any higher.
For example:
-Team Blueberry begins the match with 11 players.
-The maximum amount of LAVs that can be called in should equate to 3: the total amount of seat positions available being 9 (3 seats available per LAV)
-1 other player joins the Blueberries later on in the match
-The total number of vehicles allowed now should equate to 12 seats, thus enabling an extra LAV to be called in.
-4 players, for whatever reason leave the match
-The total number of LAVs allowed should then drop to 2
What do you think? |
TheAmazing FlyingPig
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
1315
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 01:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
I think that free LAV's were a mistake and need to be removed. |
Skihids
Tritan's Onslaught RISE of LEGION
1689
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 01:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
I think that's stupid. |
Cody Sietz
Tritan's Onslaught RISE of LEGION
356
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 02:00:00 -
[4] - Quote
Skihids wrote:I think that's stupid. Its not that bad. I think lavs and havs should bot count toward dropships. |
Princeps Marcellus
Expert Intervention Caldari State
76
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 02:01:00 -
[5] - Quote
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:I think that free LAV's were a mistake and need to be removed.
I agree. |
Iblis Jihad
BIG BAD W0LVES Eternal Syndicate
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 02:01:00 -
[6] - Quote
A lot of thinking going on here. |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
568
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 02:04:00 -
[7] - Quote
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:I think that free LAV's were a mistake and need to be removed. I believe they have a speeder bike type of thing in the making. When that's finished CCP will very likely remove the free LAV and replace it with that. |
FIRST TESTDUMMY
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 02:16:00 -
[8] - Quote
I promise that this proposal does not force you to throw coins at a node canon:
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=90877
This new idea could work, right? |
Skihids
Tritan's Onslaught RISE of LEGION
1689
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 03:57:00 -
[9] - Quote
So someone calls in a STD dropship with 6 seats and two others call in LAVs and that's it for the entire team?
Or two folks call in a HAVs and two more call in LAVs and everyone else has to walk?
That's lame. |
FIRST TESTDUMMY
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 04:05:00 -
[10] - Quote
Skihids wrote:So someone calls in a STD dropship with 6 seats and two others call in LAVs and that's it for the entire team?
Or two folks call in a HAVs and two more call in LAVs and everyone else has to walk?
That's lame. Really? I think that is a fair amount. Instead of lone tankers or solo pilots, vehicles can be utilized more for team play. |
|
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
250
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 04:12:00 -
[11] - Quote
lolno
Spec out for AV. Stop looking for a solution to a non-existent problem. |
Delta 749
Kestrel Reconnaissance
716
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 04:16:00 -
[12] - Quote
FIRST TESTDUMMY wrote:Skihids wrote:So someone calls in a STD dropship with 6 seats and two others call in LAVs and that's it for the entire team?
Or two folks call in a HAVs and two more call in LAVs and everyone else has to walk?
That's lame. Really? I think that is a fair amount. Instead of lone tankers or solo pilots, vehicles can be utilized more for team play.
Implying vehicle players want to be included with infantry Hell, as bad as they are the only LAVs I see that will actually slow down and load up other players are the free ones |
Sgt Buttscratch
G I A N T EoN.
333
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 04:36:00 -
[13] - Quote
My idea is queing the most expensive items in 1st, then letting a 15 second window pass than free items may be called |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
3017
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 05:34:00 -
[14] - Quote
Sounds like a good idea on paper but I wonder if it holds any practicality on the battlefield.
What about speeders (aka hover bikes) when they get implemented? They have 1 seat. Once they get into the game and a team has 16 players, then you will see 16 speeders going in becoming the next murder taxi to troll the battlefield. |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
250
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 05:53:00 -
[15] - Quote
Sgt Buttscratch wrote:My idea is queing the most expensive items in 1st, then letting a 15 second window pass than free items may be called Does that mean terrible Enforcers get called in before mainline Madrugars? |
13th Clone
The Merc Net
4
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:29:00 -
[16] - Quote
Restrict free lav to 5 requests or 5 lav's meaning if u recall it you can call it back in per person really 5 each in game should be enough for its normal intended purpose of transporting . |
Xocoyol Zaraoul
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
543
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:31:00 -
[17] - Quote
So a single dropship would then utterly destroy anyone's hopes of calling in additional vehicles? A dropship is seven seats, after all.
Also, I don't see why I, an HAV pilot, have to be further penalized by the idiotic free LAV spam.
Your suggestion to nerf LAV spams would penalize everyone, this is killing a fly with a shotgun. |
FIRST TESTDUMMY
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:36:00 -
[18] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Sounds like a good idea on paper but I wonder if it holds any practicality on the battlefield.
What about speeders (aka hover bikes) when they get implemented? They have 1 seat. Once they get into the game and a team has 16 players, then you will see 16 speeders going in becoming the next murder taxi to troll the battlefield.
EDIT:
What about fighters? Aren't those 1-seat vehicles as well? Imagine the skies swarming with them.
But the scenario you present is very unlikely, is it not? What are the chances that an entire team of 16 will each have specced into bikes and fighters? What about the players that will still opt to get their Madrugars and LLAVs out.
If one Python is queued in, 6 or so available seat positions are effectively taken out, thus making the scenario a little more balanced as opposed to 16 total bikes.
However, I will agree with you in that the idea does look good on paper, but may lack practicality as of now. I'm sure that my proposal can be tweaked and refined. My only intention was to offer a solution to the constant rants on murder taxis, but it seems that very few want to offer any suggestions other than:
No free LAVS! |
Aizen Intiki
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
33
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:37:00 -
[19] - Quote
hell no. |
Cy Clone1
Ill Omens EoN.
33
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:42:00 -
[20] - Quote
let your team have as many vehicles as they want. put your cognitive thinking into more important issues sir. |
|
Aizen Intiki
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
36
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:44:00 -
[21] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Sounds like a good idea on paper but I wonder if it holds any practicality on the battlefield.
What about speeders (aka hover bikes) when they get implemented? They have 1 seat. Once they get into the game and a team has 16 players, then you will see 16 speeders going in becoming the next murder taxi to troll the battlefield.
EDIT:
What about fighters? Aren't those 1-seat vehicles as well? Imagine the skies swarming with them.
2-seat, and I imagine that 75-80% of people that aren't even pilots will get ROFL stomped by the real pilots, in any vehicle, or crash a lot, and then would go bankrupt in a day. Then would complain that they suck even though all good pilots know better, and would either
1: ask for a buff
2: ask for a respec
Nither would happen, and it would be funny as ****
Peace, Aizen |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
595
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 10:06:00 -
[22] - Quote
OP is an idiot
If i call in a dropship that is 7seats gone
I want no vehicle limits, the more the merrier |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |