| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
DARKSTAR ARMY
236
   |
Posted - 2013.07.02 10:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
This will be the most problematic goal to reach, installations are very limited.
In every match we will have the opportunity to farm a lot of kills and kill assist,150 clones for each side in skirmish are virtually 9 kills for each player.
You can hack everything again and again.
But the installations number is very limited and we have to divide it for the 2 teams.
Please, count vehicles as installations |
Corn In TheSkidmark
Backstabbers N Cheaters Union
133
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 10:21:00 -
[2] - Quote
I'm going to love flying my dropship during this! There won't be a turret on a map to be found anywhere! |
OZAROW
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
40
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 10:22:00 -
[3] - Quote
Gonna be tough with people trying to hack an others trying to blow them up |
Michael Arck
sephiroth clones
General Tso's Alliance
54
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 10:22:00 -
[4] - Quote
Blowing up 100 installations is really that hard to do? |
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
DARKSTAR ARMY
236
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 10:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
Corn In TheSkidmark wrote:I'm going to love flying my dropship during this! There won't be a turret on a map to be found anywhere!
Yes and 8 railgun tanks on each side  |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries
DARKSTAR ARMY
353
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 10:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
Lol thats only 5 turrets per game for 20 games lol 100 is nothing and im not even counting crus or supply depos. 100 is easy if you cant destroy 100 instalations over 7 days in your rail tank your doing it wrong. |
Another Heavy SOB
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
EoN.
213
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 10:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
Skirmish + Ishukone Assault Forge + LAV = 5 - 9 installations destroyed in 60-90 Seconds.
Even a DAU with Prof 3 and damage mods will two shot turret installations. |
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
DARKSTAR ARMY
236
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 10:32:00 -
[8] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:Blowing up 100 installations is really that hard to do?
Nobody will have problems hacking the abandoned MLT LAVs, but everybody will want to destroy turrets (the easiest installation to destroy), the number of installations is limited, once they have been destroyed you have to play another match, clones are limited but we have a large amount of them in skirmish. |
Khal V'Rani
Nephilim Initiative
150
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 10:37:00 -
[9] - Quote
Ambush OMS until the installation count is reached? Wilco. Out.
:-P |
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
DARKSTAR ARMY
236
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 10:37:00 -
[10] - Quote
pegasis prime wrote:Lol thats only 5 turrets per game for 20 games lol 100 is nothing and im not even counting crus or supply depos. 100 is easy if you cant destroy 100 instalations over 7 days in your rail tank your doing it wrong.
Destroying them will be the primary target for everybody, are you sure you can stand the competition, prepare to see the spam of rail soma/sica, if they call their tank before you can call yours, bye bye installation, you have to leave the match and search for a new one. |
|
|
meri jin
Goonfeet
Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
63
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 10:45:00 -
[11] - Quote
shaman oga wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Lol thats only 5 turrets per game for 20 games lol 100 is nothing and im not even counting crus or supply depos. 100 is easy if you cant destroy 100 instalations over 7 days in your rail tank your doing it wrong. Destroying them will be the primary target for everybody, are you sure you can stand the competition, prepare to see the spam of rail soma/sica, if they call their tank before you can call yours, bye bye installation, you have to leave the match and search for a new one.
Well I see this 100 as something I as casual gamer can not fullfil.
And tobe honnest, how the hell should I know how many I destroyed? Count them by my own? meh... |
Khal V'Rani
Nephilim Initiative
151
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 10:55:00 -
[12] - Quote
I read somewhere around here that ccp isn't tracking these reward stats so yeah,
pencil and paper or abacus, calculator, putting rocks in your pocket then taking them
out to count pace...
Whatever polishes your boots. |
Julius Vindice
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
119
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 10:57:00 -
[13] - Quote
meri jin wrote:shaman oga wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Lol thats only 5 turrets per game for 20 games lol 100 is nothing and im not even counting crus or supply depos. 100 is easy if you cant destroy 100 instalations over 7 days in your rail tank your doing it wrong. Destroying them will be the primary target for everybody, are you sure you can stand the competition, prepare to see the spam of rail soma/sica, if they call their tank before you can call yours, bye bye installation, you have to leave the match and search for a new one. Well I see this 100 as something I as casual gamer can not fullfil. And tobe honnest, how the hell should I know how many I destroyed? Count them by my own? meh...
They should at least cut the number to 50 or something reasonable, I can't keep track of how many installations I kill that week cause I have a life to deal with as well. |
LT SHANKS
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
55
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 11:03:00 -
[14] - Quote
Lol, I hate the installation event. For the last month or so, I've been specifically running around with my FG and destroying installations. The 500 or so WP I would attain from them combined with some Forge sniping and LAV destruction always made me feel as if I was doing something right as I would later look to see that I placed high on the pub leaderboards.
This event will ruin my pseudo sense of worth on the battlefield. |
Medic 1879
Tritan's Onslaught
RISE of LEGION
521
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 11:07:00 -
[15] - Quote
I recently made a FG fit. Its crap but it gets the job done. Eventually. |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
880
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 11:09:00 -
[16] - Quote
The problem is that everyone will be destroying installations... AND we won't know when we've hit 100 so all the maps are going to be empty pretty quick! |
Rigor Mordis
Imperial Populicide Legion
Alpha Wolf Pack
56
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 11:10:00 -
[17] - Quote
i'll be taking the easy 100 a lot. |
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
DARKSTAR ARMY
236
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 11:18:00 -
[18] - Quote
It's not a problem to destroy an installation, the problem is how fast you are in to call your rail HAV.
I usually destroy more than 5 installation in every match, but there will not be 32 people trying to destroy a total of 15 installations. Less than 1 for player. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries
DARKSTAR ARMY
354
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 11:21:00 -
[19] - Quote
I doubt every one will truly try tank spaming for instalations . Butt all I can say is get your tank out first. And get as many as yiu can . Even if you get 3 and all are gone just leave battle and repeat till you reach your quota. |
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
DARKSTAR ARMY
236
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 11:30:00 -
[20] - Quote
pegasis prime wrote:I doubt every one will truly try tank spaming for instalations . Butt all I can say is get your tank out first. And get as many as yiu can . Even if you get 3 and all are gone just leave battle and repeat till you reach your quota.
Not for you, but this a stupid way of playing, destroy & leave,destroy & leave, they should count vehicles as installations, surely is more difficult to kill a LLAV than a turret.
If they fear that some people will find an exploit for this, i would like to inform them that the hacking objective can easily be exploited too. |
|
|
LT SHANKS
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
57
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 11:32:00 -
[21] - Quote
I just thought of something:
Imagine 16 Heavies with FGs jumping out of the MCC at the same time. Once on the ground, the race starts! |
meri jin
Goonfeet
Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
63
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 11:44:00 -
[22] - Quote
shaman oga wrote:pegasis prime wrote:I doubt every one will truly try tank spaming for instalations . Butt all I can say is get your tank out first. And get as many as yiu can . Even if you get 3 and all are gone just leave battle and repeat till you reach your quota. Not for you, but this a stupid way of playing, destroy & leave,destroy & leave, they should count vehicles as installations, surely is more difficult to kill a LLAV than a turret. If they fear that some people will find an exploit for this, i would like to inform them that the hacking objective can easily be exploited too.
I have seen this. And we will se more of this after the 11. Destroint Installation should be 30 and hacking at maximum 50.
What do you think guys? |
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
DARKSTAR ARMY
236
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 11:50:00 -
[23] - Quote
i would have no problem with 100x if vehicles are counted as installation (LAV,HAV,DS,RDV) |
Vavilia Lysenko
Company of Marcher Lords
Amarr Empire
92
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 11:56:00 -
[24] - Quote
Julius Vindice wrote:meri jin wrote:shaman oga wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Lol thats only 5 turrets per game for 20 games lol 100 is nothing and im not even counting crus or supply depos. 100 is easy if you cant destroy 100 instalations over 7 days in your rail tank your doing it wrong. Destroying them will be the primary target for everybody, are you sure you can stand the competition, prepare to see the spam of rail soma/sica, if they call their tank before you can call yours, bye bye installation, you have to leave the match and search for a new one. Well I see this 100 as something I as casual gamer can not fullfil. And tobe honnest, how the hell should I know how many I destroyed? Count them by my own? meh... They should at least cut the number to 50 or something reasonable, I can't keep track of how many installations I kill that week cause I have a life to deal with as well.
So you won't get 100 Installation Destructions, I am damn sure I won't either.
Why should these events be reduced so that everyone can get ALL the rewards?
They shouldn't, is the simple answer.
"Go for the goals that best suit your play style, OR get them all and earn some exceptional equipment to dominate the battlefield!"
This looks like a nice event, looking forward to shooting some people in the Head (or legs or arse w/e)
|
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
DARKSTAR ARMY
236
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 12:07:00 -
[25] - Quote
the problem is that you don't need skills to reach the 100x cap, i want play not grind.
Kills, assists and hacks can be exploited and destroying installation is only a matter of how fast you call your HAV. |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
889
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 14:50:00 -
[26] - Quote
FFS, if you don't want to chase after the goals... ignore them and just play the game. |
Nin Ker
Forsaken Immortals
18
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 14:53:00 -
[27] - Quote
It's a challenge, it's in the name.
It's not supposed to be easy. |
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
DARKSTAR ARMY
241
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 15:24:00 -
[28] - Quote
it's not a challenge, it's a boring race against your teammates |
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
DARKSTAR ARMY
249
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 11:30:00 -
[29] - Quote
come on CCP you are still in time to turn this event in something different than a boring grinding event, the rest is ok but this
100x installation destruction objective is unfair. |
GET ATMESON
NEW AGE EMPIRE
The Family Syndicate
12
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 11:39:00 -
[30] - Quote
shaman oga wrote:This will be the most problematic goal to reach, installations are very limited.
In every match we will have the opportunity to farm a lot of kills and kill assist,150 clones for each side in skirmish are virtually 9 kills for each player.
You can hack everything again and again.
But the installations number is very limited and we have to divide it for the 2 teams.
Please, count vehicles as installations
DId you think of OMS???
They fall from the sky+ they are ALOT faster then a skirmish.
Make it 50 insted of 100
You are just trying to find a cheap way of getting ths goal done
Less QQ about this and think. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |