DUST Search - Another Dropship Mistake.

Serimos Haeraven wrote:

Thor McStrut wrote:

Serimos Haeraven wrote:

Skihids wrote:

CCP demands that you shoot at things.
They don't want you playing support.

I don't know how they could be more clear about this:

WPs earned only by killing.
Mandatory turret placement.
Completly buggered support modules.

Then let Assault dropships have the ability to not include sideturrets at least, i get kills all the time by "shooting at things" and the entire statement that "CCP demands you shoot at things" is completely opinionated, in-fact their long term goal is to make vehicles an extremely integrated component into the game, not some run-n-gun call of duty copy that only encourages mindless killing, what are you, 4 years old?

Actually, it is a fairly accurate statement. Opinions aside, all fitting are invalid until you fit at least one weapon on everything. Even logistics suits require a weapon to be fit. How is that not "demanding that you shoot at things?"

What are you, 3 years old? Roll

Comparing infantry to Dropships is where you lose your point in this argument. Don't debate dropship issues if you have no experience with them please. Also, i made this edit to that reply to better-forward my argument against yours that CCP only encourages killing and no support roles;

WP is not only earned by killing, i am not sure if you have played dust before cooperatively or even playing skirmish. You can earn WP from capturing objectives, putting Drop Uplinks down, and hacking other units that are in enemy control, if anything i would say that Dust encourages support roles more than just shoot em up roles. I can't even believe someone with 1K likes on here would assert such blasphemy


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Thor McStrut Reckoners 34	Posted - 2013.07.01 04:00:00 - [1] - Quote The reading comprehension failure in this thread gives me no hope for humanity. You both have good ideas. I think that CCP needs to remove the weapon requirement for making a valid fit for all things, vehicles and dropsuits alike. But, having different tactical options to fit in turret slots is a great idea too.
Thor McStrut Reckoners 34	Posted - 2013.07.01 04:03:00 - [2] - Quote Serimos Haeraven wrote: Skihids wrote: CCP demands that you shoot at things. They don't want you playing support. I don't know how they could be more clear about this: WPs earned only by killing. Mandatory turret placement. Completly buggered support modules. Then let Assault dropships have the ability to not include sideturrets at least, i get kills all the time by "shooting at things" and the entire statement that "CCP demands you shoot at things" is completely opinionated, in-fact their long term goal is to make vehicles an extremely integrated component into the game, not some run-n-gun call of duty copy that only encourages mindless killing, what are you, 4 years old? Actually, it is a fairly accurate statement. Opinions aside, all fitting are invalid until you fit at least one weapon on everything. Even logistics suits require a weapon to be fit. How is that not "demanding that you shoot at things?" What are you, 3 years old?
Thor McStrut Reckoners 34	Posted - 2013.07.01 04:21:00 - [3] - Quote Serimos Haeraven wrote: Thor McStrut wrote: Serimos Haeraven wrote: Skihids wrote: CCP demands that you shoot at things. They don't want you playing support. I don't know how they could be more clear about this: WPs earned only by killing. Mandatory turret placement. Completly buggered support modules. Then let Assault dropships have the ability to not include sideturrets at least, i get kills all the time by "shooting at things" and the entire statement that "CCP demands you shoot at things" is completely opinionated, in-fact their long term goal is to make vehicles an extremely integrated component into the game, not some run-n-gun call of duty copy that only encourages mindless killing, what are you, 4 years old? Actually, it is a fairly accurate statement. Opinions aside, all fitting are invalid until you fit at least one weapon on everything. Even logistics suits require a weapon to be fit. How is that not "demanding that you shoot at things?" What are you, 3 years old? Comparing infantry to Dropships is where you lose your point in this argument. Don't debate dropship issues if you have no experience with them please. Also, i made this edit to that reply to better-forward my argument against yours that CCP only encourages killing and no support roles; WP is not only earned by killing, i am not sure if you have played dust before cooperatively or even playing skirmish. You can earn WP from capturing objectives, putting Drop Uplinks down, and hacking other units that are in enemy control, if anything i would say that Dust encourages support roles more than just shoot em up roles. I can't even believe someone with 1K likes on here would assert such blasphemy Ok. How many kills can you get before you stop earning WP? How much repping can you do before you stop earning WP? Is there a cool down timer that starts after you've done a certain level of killing in which you can no longer earn WP? How many WPs do you earn from deploying that squad from your DS? How many WPs do you earn picking up and redeploying that squad in your DS? DS issues are many. But the fact that you can't fly your DS without turrets fit is parallel to the issue that you can't deploy a dropsuit without a weapon fit, regardless of the tactical role you'd like to play on the battlefield. I'm not here to derail your thread, just to point out that you clearly don't have the mental capacity to communicate with other gamers on this board. If you are so knowledgeable of this game, then you'd clearly understand that no turret exists that performed the task that he was suggesting, and that he then must clearly be asking for something to potentially be added to the game that might solve your issue without breaking what CCP believes to be a requirement. It's called reading comprehension. I suggest you practice it.