|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Skihids
Tritan's Onslaught
RISE of LEGION
1674
   |
Posted - 2013.07.01 03:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP demands that you shoot at things.
They don't want you playing support.
I don't know hw they could be more clear about this:
WPs earned only by killing.
Mandatory turret placement.
Completly buggered support modules. |
Skihids
Tritan's Onslaught
RISE of LEGION
1674
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 04:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
Serimos Haeraven wrote:Skihids wrote:CCP demands that you shoot at things.
They don't want you playing support.
I don't know how they could be more clear about this:
WPs earned only by killing.
Mandatory turret placement.
Completly buggered support modules. Then let Assault dropships have the ability to not include sideturrets at least, i get kills all the time by "shooting at things" and the entire statement that "CCP demands you shoot at things" is completely opinionated, in-fact their long term goal is to make vehicles an extremely integrated component into the game, not some run-n-gun call of duty copy that only encourages mindless killing, what are you, 4 years old? And WP is not only earned by killing, i am not sure if you have played dust before cooperatively or even playing skirmish. You can earn WP from capturing objectives, putting Drop Uplinks down, and hacking other units that are in enemy control, if anything i would say that Dust encourages support roles more than just shoot em up roles. I can't even believe someone with 1K likes on here would assert such blasphemy
No, I'm not four years old. I'm a bitter dropship pilot who lobbied for meaningful misions for nearly one year and witnessed CCP trash the dropship further with each release. My opinion is sarcastic but supported by the evidence. The only way to ern WPs with a dropship is to kill and blow stuff up. Now CCP Blam is working on a bomber variant rather than fix the shield transfer module or the aclive scanner for dropship use. Your suggestion was made months ago snd ignored by CCP. Stick around for another year and you too can become a bitter ex dropship pilot. |
Skihids
Tritan's Onslaught
RISE of LEGION
1682
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 22:17:00 -
[3] - Quote
Serimos Haeraven wrote:Skihids wrote:Serimos Haeraven wrote:Skihids wrote:CCP demands that you shoot at things.
They don't want you playing support.
I don't know how they could be more clear about this:
WPs earned only by killing.
Mandatory turret placement.
Completly buggered support modules. Then let Assault dropships have the ability to not include sideturrets at least, i get kills all the time by "shooting at things" and the entire statement that "CCP demands you shoot at things" is completely opinionated, in-fact their long term goal is to make vehicles an extremely integrated component into the game, not some run-n-gun call of duty copy that only encourages mindless killing, what are you, 4 years old? And WP is not only earned by killing, i am not sure if you have played dust before cooperatively or even playing skirmish. You can earn WP from capturing objectives, putting Drop Uplinks down, and hacking other units that are in enemy control, if anything i would say that Dust encourages support roles more than just shoot em up roles. I can't even believe someone with 1K likes on here would assert such blasphemy No, I'm not four years old. I'm a bitter dropship pilot who lobbied for meaningful misions for nearly one year and witnessed CCP trash the dropship further with each release. My opinion is sarcastic but supported by the evidence. The only way to ern WPs with a dropship is to kill and blow stuff up. Now CCP Blam is working on a bomber variant rather than fix the shield transfer module or the aclive scanner for dropship use. Your suggestion was made months ago snd ignored by CCP. Stick around for another year and you too can become a bitter ex dropship pilot. It's the moment you begin to give up advocating for the right thing that the mission has been lost. Believe me, i have been replied to by CCP devs (including CCP Blam) as well and promised many things regarding dropships but have been let down just like you, but that doesn't mean i am not going to stop at least making the best effort i can into trying to have if anything a little dent in affecting the horrible managing on behalf of CCP as far as DS pilots are concerned. If anything, you should join us non-bitter veteran DS pilots like myself in constantly reviving this issue, which is a primary goal i intend to keep
By all means, keep at it. Fight the good fight.
The thing is that CCP is plenty aware of all the points brought up by pilots over the past year.
We've got half a dozen threadnoughts with intelligent thoughtful content spilling out everywhere back in the dead section of the forums. To continue the fight would mean periodically posting links to the old threads and that would get old for everyone.
|
|
|
| |
|