| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
DARKSTAR ARMY
233
   |
Posted - 2013.06.30 19:36:00 -
[1] - Quote
Follow me:
20GJ Blaster damage 25 PG 100 CPU 8
80GJ Blaster damage 105 PG 1000 CPU 40
assuming we have a 10GJ turret, values should be:
10GJ Blaster damage 12.5 PG 50 CPU 4 (1/2 20GJ) >>>>80 GJ dmg 100 - - PG 400 - - CPU 32
or
10GJ Blaster damage 13.125 PG 125 CPU 5 (1/8 80GJ) >>>> 20 GJ dmg 26.25 - - PG 250 - - CPU 10
Values are different, but the turret is the same.
I have not calculated the other turrets values but i suppose that results will be the same.
Damage and CPU have not a very different difference, but PG value is very different (125-50=75 difference)
The question is 20GJ turrets should cost more PG/CPU or 80GJ turrets should cost less PG/CPU?
|
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
DARKSTAR ARMY
235
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 19:01:00 -
[2] - Quote
up
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
1855
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 19:07:00 -
[3] - Quote
Why would we have a 10 GJ? we would have a 40GJ one. Also, the RoF is different between sizes, I believe. |
KOBLAKA1
Opus Arcana
Covert Intervention
150
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 19:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
shaman oga wrote:Follow me:
20GJ Blaster damage 25 PG 100 CPU 8
80GJ Blaster damage 105 PG 1000 CPU 40
assuming we have a 10GJ turret, values should be:
10GJ Blaster damage 12.5 PG 50 CPU 4 (1/2 20GJ) >>>>80 GJ dmg 100 - - PG 400 - - CPU 32
or
10GJ Blaster damage 13.125 PG 125 CPU 5 (1/8 80GJ) >>>> 20 GJ dmg 26.25 - - PG 250 - - CPU 10
Values are different, but the turret is the same.
I have not calculated the other turrets values but i suppose that results will be the same.
Damage and CPU have not a very different difference, but PG value is very different (125-50=75 difference)
The question is 20GJ turrets should cost more PG/CPU or 80GJ turrets should cost less PG/CPU?
CCP make these Heavy slot equipable i'd fit a 20Gj blaster on my heavy |
Oso Peresoso
RisingSuns
58
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 19:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
this is a bad thread and you should feel bad. |
Meeko Fent
Seituoda Taskforce Command
Caldari State
114
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 21:57:00 -
[6] - Quote
KOBLAKA1 wrote:shaman oga wrote:Follow me:
20GJ Blaster damage 25 PG 100 CPU 8
80GJ Blaster damage 105 PG 1000 CPU 40
assuming we have a 10GJ turret, values should be:
10GJ Blaster damage 12.5 PG 50 CPU 4 (1/2 20GJ) >>>>80 GJ dmg 100 - - PG 400 - - CPU 32
or
10GJ Blaster damage 13.125 PG 125 CPU 5 (1/8 80GJ) >>>> 20 GJ dmg 26.25 - - PG 250 - - CPU 10
Values are different, but the turret is the same.
I have not calculated the other turrets values but i suppose that results will be the same.
Damage and CPU have not a very different difference, but PG value is very different (125-50=75 difference)
The question is 20GJ turrets should cost more PG/CPU or 80GJ turrets should cost less PG/CPU?
CCP make these Heavy slot equipable i'd fit a 20Gj blaster on my heavy
I originally thought that would be what CCP would Do with the Heavies when I heard about them Prior to getting CB access. |
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
DARKSTAR ARMY
236
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 09:41:00 -
[7] - Quote
updated thread with a new question |
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
610
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 09:45:00 -
[8] - Quote
shaman oga wrote:updated thread with a new question
Who said it had to be linear?? 
|
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
DARKSTAR ARMY
236
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 09:49:00 -
[9] - Quote
ChromeBreaker wrote:shaman oga wrote:updated thread with a new question Who said it had to be linear??
Nobody, i gave you two options, but both based on a linear calculation
damage and cpu are almost linear, pg is the most unstable variant. |
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
610
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 09:55:00 -
[10] - Quote
shaman oga wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote:shaman oga wrote:updated thread with a new question Who said it had to be linear?? Nobody, i gave you two options, but both based on a linear calculation damage and cpu are almost linear, pg is the most unstable variant.
Its a control variant to regulate fits. Its part of balancing. the increase in CPU doesnt relate directly to the increase in PG |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |