|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
815
   |
Posted - 2013.06.30 16:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
XeroTheBigBoss wrote:Are you guys aware of how godlike it is? Is there plans to nerf it down a little bit? It's getting to the point where people are just running around using nothing else specially in the Planetary Conquest that was suppose to bring Longevity to the game. Nobody will want to go up against full teams of guys using Rapid fire grenade launchers that are more than capable of killing with splash damage.
The gun is fine. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
816
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 17:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Buster Friently wrote:XeroTheBigBoss wrote:Are you guys aware of how godlike it is? Is there plans to nerf it down a little bit? It's getting to the point where people are just running around using nothing else specially in the Planetary Conquest that was suppose to bring Longevity to the game. Nobody will want to go up against full teams of guys using Rapid fire grenade launchers that are more than capable of killing with splash damage. The gun is fine. Clearly you don't play this game. Go into some PC matches and its probably somewhere between 40-80% of all kills in a match. Some corps are just speccing completely into flaylocks and running dual core godlock pistols. It's need it's RoF halved and its splash radius normalized between variants.
Put up some vids to back up your claims.
Otherwise, my text is as valid as yours.
Flaylock, including Core, is fine.
For the record, doing what you suggest would eliminate the weapon from the game. Kinda like Lasers now, and to a slightly lesser degree MDs. Let me guess, you only use the AR right? |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
817
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 20:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
alec trebec wrote:Its not an isolated incident though, its not one player having the odd good game, its several players having consistent great games. You can be in as much denial as you want about the flay lock. It needs to be nerfed or at least the ISK cost tripled.
Noobs vs l33tzors what ever .its a crutch. Period.
No, it doesn't. Go back to your AR and STFU.
You get good at the flaylock and then talk about whether it's OP or not.
It doesn't help that most AR users think that they're "good" and therefore anything, or anyone that kills them consistently must be OP.
L2P. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
838
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 01:54:00 -
[4] - Quote
Demon Buddah wrote:It is OP for sure. I see them destroy even shield tankers. I can't dodge their splash damage, sometimes I get lucky and dodge it but it's a pistol so it reloads really quickly. It needs to be nerfed definitely. The people that say it's fine is because they're the ones going 30-0 every match. I understand it can take an armor tanker like me down pretty well but not like it is. They hit me once and I'm at below half armor. Shield tankers have a problem too. Ridiculous.
Lol. It isn't OP, but Meh. CCP knows this.
It just isn't an AR. Deal. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1096
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 00:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
Meeko Fent wrote:Stile451 wrote:You are absolutely correct that it's balanced with other sidearms in regards to direct damage. It is not balanced with any weapon that has splash damage. Indeed. Reduce the faglocks to 20 points lower then the MD, and also wimpify the radius. It's a one inch rocket for Pete's sake! It shouldn't have as much splash as a big grenade from a grenade launcher!
Yeah, but it's the MD splash that's too small, not the other way around. |
|
|
| |
|