|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
800
   |
Posted - 2013.06.30 01:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:I kept track of the reasons of death for 130 matches. I died a total of 205 times. It is as follows: 6% Spawn deaths 27% LLAV's 23% Free LAV's 15% Flaylock's 11% Assault rifles 11% Snipers 2% mysterious deaths (Deaths that I have no explanation towards, just died out of nowhere) + RDV's 5% other (Every other possible cause of death) This is rounded up to make nice numbers. My fit for all of these matches (I wanted to keep it consistant so I used one suit): Assault gk.0 Duvolle AR 2x Complex damage mod 1x Enhanced damage mod 1x Basic Plate 1x Enhanced plate 2x Complex armor repairer 1x Nanohive 1x Proto AV Grenade Pie chart using accurate numbers coming Soon(TM) Edit: Ze glorious and awesomesauce pie chart
I'm gonna go ahead and call bullshit on this.
First, no grenade deaths at all? No deaths from the scrambler rifle, pistol, MD (I can believe), Shotgun, remote explosives? These were all, combined, less that 5%?
Maybe, but it seems odd. This doesn't match up to what I experience, though I haven't done the data collection that the OP suggests he did.
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
815
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 16:39:00 -
[2] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Jin Robot wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Jin Robot wrote:op is false, and he knows it. Do you have proof other than "I am killed by something, everyone else must be killed by that thing the same amount!" not proof, its just obvious these "stats" are false. Whelp, believe what you want. This is my record of my deaths in 130 matches, like it or not this shows the game is heavily flawed.
It doesn't show anything of the sort.
If you want to demonstrate that, you need to transcribe the killfeed for a while, not your own personal deaths (assuming this is accurate, i still have my doubts).
Assuming these data to be accurate, all it shows is how you fight. It seems you get run over a lot. This isn't an indictment on the game, moreso your playstyle.
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
815
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 16:41:00 -
[3] - Quote
Son-Of A-Gun wrote:"15% Flaylock's
11% Assault rifles"
I don't believe that even in the slightest.
This is one of the data points that I think points to falsified data. Either that or a very odd death profile. Either way, these data have nothing to say about the game at large because of this. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
816
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 17:00:00 -
[4] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:"15% Flaylock's
11% Assault rifles"
I don't believe that even in the slightest. This is one of the data points that I think points to falsified data. Either that or a very odd death profile. Either way, these data have nothing to say about the game at large because of this. Don't believe it. AR isn't a problem for me as I tend to stay far away and only engage when I see a clear oppurtunity. However, people tend to sneak up on me with the flaylock and kill me faster than I can turn to their way. Are you EU or US?
I am US. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
816
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 17:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
Provolonee wrote:I recorded deaths from the Kill feed Just before the TAR nerf. The data is a bit old, but it is interesting to see the fall of the TAR and the Rise of the FP.
Kills across 7 matches:
-AR --269
-TAR --143
-Scrambler Rifle --37
Assault ScR -- 20
MD --13
SG --19
SMG --56
sPistol--11
Snipe--110
Vehicle--80
Vehicle turrets -- 24
Lasers -- 1
Flalock pistol-- 4
grenade -- 33
remote explosives --2
AntiVehicle --57
nova Knife -- 8
HMG --59
The TAR isn't used as much now, did those numbers get moved to the FP?
No, his numbers are skewed. TAR users aren't FP users. Most of the MD users have moved to FP though. I think most of the TAR users went to AR or SR.
These numbers seem much more like what I still see minus the TAR kills. |
|
|
| |
|