|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
2048
   |
Posted - 2013.06.30 01:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
If there isn't something to fight over, that people want, that didn't exist before the fighting started, it isn't a good incentive.
Clones don't cut it. Gobs of ISK don't even really cut it. Heck maybe you should just give away ~10 AUR per 1000 WP in FW and call it a day. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
2048
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 01:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:If there isn't something to fight over, that people want, that didn't exist before the fighting started, it isn't a good incentive.
Clones don't cut it. Gobs of ISK don't even really cut it. Heck maybe you should just give away ~10 AUR per 1000 WP in FW and call it a day. FW officer weapon variants purchasable with loyalty points, in addition to increased SP/ISK rewards would go a long way in making FW the place to be for well geared players.
They already said no to Loyalty Points. And the last thing we need right now is another broken market. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
2048
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 01:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
Telcontar Dunedain wrote:CCP Nullarbor wrote:Telcontar Dunedain wrote:If by "challenge" you mean some kind of wager like the old system? I don't like that. Complicated hasn't worked out so far. Leave it in PC. Nope. Telcontar Dunedain wrote:Why not just have FW be simple.
We queue whatever size group we want into whatever side we want. Size 1-16 WHO CARES.
Matchmaking happens.
We either get a stacked team if available OR the queuing system brings together the best it can.
Fight.
Simple and gets us team fights.
Yes people might run into organized groups! SHOCKING
The might LEARN that its better if they organize by finding another squad to join them in queing first! What a concept.
Lets get some fights going.
Don't make it complicated.
"Hisec is where individuals learn to squad, lowsec is where squads learn to team"
Something more like this, there is more to it but we're not ready to reveal details just yet. You waited quite a while on PC to talk to us and all anyone could help with was fiddle numbers... I'd like to be able to tell the boys that they will be able to login and get a team queue in 1.3 That and the FPS basics are what we need most.
CCP is still enamoured with the idea that not telling us what they are planning let's our imaginations run wild with wonder. This strategy blew up in their face and now we much assume they are not doing anything every time the tell us "details coming soon". |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
2048
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 02:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote:Telcontar Dunedain wrote:CCP Nullarbor wrote:Telcontar Dunedain wrote:If by "challenge" you mean some kind of wager like the old system? I don't like that. Complicated hasn't worked out so far. Leave it in PC. Nope. Telcontar Dunedain wrote:Why not just have FW be simple.
We queue whatever size group we want into whatever side we want. Size 1-16 WHO CARES.
Matchmaking happens.
We either get a stacked team if available OR the queuing system brings together the best it can.
Fight.
Simple and gets us team fights.
Yes people might run into organized groups! SHOCKING
The might LEARN that its better if they organize by finding another squad to join them in queing first! What a concept.
Lets get some fights going.
Don't make it complicated.
"Hisec is where individuals learn to squad, lowsec is where squads learn to team"
Something more like this, there is more to it but we're not ready to reveal details just yet. You waited quite a while on PC to talk to us and all anyone could help with was fiddle numbers... I'd like to be able to tell the boys that they will be able to login and get a team queue in 1.3 That and the FPS basics are what we need most. We are still in the design phase, first step will be going through it all with the CPM then we can open it up for further discussion with players.
What makes the CPM qualified to make that kind of decision?
|
Noc Tempre
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
2048
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 02:07:00 -
[5] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:IMPS do us all a favor and not come inhere to ***** about **** thats irrelevant to the forum topic, seriously. You see a dev post and instantly go into troll mode, just shut up and not say anything if youre not even going to stay on topic.
Lick some more boots. I do not enjoy the taste. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
2055
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 18:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:
What makes the CPM qualified to make that kind of decision?
A. They were elected for being active inthe community, incidentally enough theyre actually pretty civil too. B. You realize Kane Spero is part of the CPM as well, right? Youre basically questioning one of your own, lol. C. They also dont propose bullshit solutions like 'leave it be' and then complain that its broken.
A. They were? Really?
B. I trust Kane as an excellent communicator. ALL CPM should be focused on connecting decision makers with those affected. The statement I quoted suggested CPM cannot even relay any conversations on THE make or break feature of this game. There is no reasonable explanation CCP considers it NDA.
C. No idea who you are talking about, but it sure as hell isn't me or anyone I respect. Perhaps projecting yourself? |
|
|
| |
|