|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
600
   |
Posted - 2013.06.27 14:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
In corp battles, it occurs to me that calling in vehicles, such as LLAVs, for teammates without sp in them, is quite a useful tactic.
My suggestion is to have a preset quotient of vehicles, decided by a CEO/Director/Battle leader, of vehicles that anyone in the battle can call in.
These vehicles can be donated by any corp member, and then made accessible in an extra option on the RDV request screen.
Currently this ability is only possible if you're in the same location as the vehicle owner. I think it would be a good idea to simply have the RDV with their vehicle travel to your location.
I'd personally rather see other features such as corp armouries, role designations, etc etc, but I would love to see this some time in the future. |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
603
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 15:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
Meeko Fent wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:In corp battles, it occurs to me that calling in vehicles, such as LLAVs, for teammates without sp in them, is quite a useful tactic.
My suggestion is to have a preset quotient of vehicles, decided by a CEO/Director/Battle leader, of vehicles that anyone in the battle can call in.
These vehicles can be donated by any corp member, and then made accessible in an extra option on the RDV request screen.
Currently this ability is only possible if you're in the same location as the vehicle owner. I think it would be a good idea to simply have the RDV with their vehicle travel to your location.
I'd personally rather see other features such as corp armouries, role designations, etc etc, but I would love to see this some time in the future. So Basically a Corp Hanger? We all want this, so we can Spend the Corps Money on PC battles with Protosuits! No, Seriously. We need Corp Hangers
I think you're thinking of the corp armoury idea. This would function differently from that, because it would not be simply exchanging assets, but making fully fitted vehicles available during battle.
I am very mush in favour of the corp armoury though. I'm glad it is confirmed, but impatient for its released. |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
603
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 16:20:00 -
[3] - Quote
Wojciak wrote:The only thing i have to say on this is that if to do this you have to pick what to use in the corp battle and if you loose toy get all everything you picked for the Battle lost.
I don't really understand why that's needed. |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
603
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 16:49:00 -
[4] - Quote
Wojciak wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Wojciak wrote:The only thing i have to say on this is that if to do this you have to pick what to use in the corp battle and if you loose toy get all everything you picked for the Battle lost. I don't really understand why that's needed. It is the risk v reward, i would say that you have to have a thing like the MCC but it id for the vehicles or they would be packed into the MCC. then when you have you MCC destroyed you would loose all the vehicles you have paced into it. It would also limit the amount you can use. When fighting a war the most important thing is your logistics for the fighting.
On that basis the suit use should work the same. |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
603
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 17:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
Daedric Lothar wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote: On that basis the suit use should work the same. Lol, I can see it now, Protosuits are only used to Pubstomp newbies, whenever you go into PC, you switch to Militia so you don't lose $64 million in suits in one second.
I don't mind the idea, it makes sense in principle. I like the idea of forcing even greater rage on people.
Actually, now that I think of it, it would be a good idea for nulsec.
There are lots of potential ways to introduce PC to nulsec. |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
603
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 17:05:00 -
[6] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Corp armory. Solved your problem. No need to complicate things. Peace, Godin 
I already addressed that distinction. |
|
|
| |
|