|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
434
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 03:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
If it means more tanks for me to blow up then I have no problem with this |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
434
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 03:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
Disturbingly Bored wrote:Yeah, so, had an interesting experience today. I solo'd a tank.
Now you might say, "DB, you're a Heavy. Us tank drivers already pray to whatever gods we believe in that every one of you Forge Gunners develops testicular cancer. That's no surprise."
However, I was using nothing but Flux Grenades and my trusty HMG. I had no idea I could kill a tank with an HMG. I never tried before. Granted, it could have been a gimp tank, but...seriously.
ON TOPIC:
I always though vehicles should reliably die to AV, but that they should be cheap enough to field every game if you wanted. That way vehicles are more like a class (like Assault or Logi or Heavy) and a valid playstyle, without being frustratingly powerful.
I honestly believe it should be no more expensive to field a HAV than it is to field a proto Assault, given that AV remains effective. If they cost the same as a proto assault expect CCP to nerf them even more. |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
434
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 03:20:00 -
[3] - Quote
Charlotte O'Dell wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Disturbingly Bored wrote:Yeah, so, had an interesting experience today. I solo'd a tank.
Now you might say, "DB, you're a Heavy. Us tank drivers already pray to whatever gods we believe in that every one of you Forge Gunners develops testicular cancer. That's no surprise."
However, I was using nothing but Flux Grenades and my trusty HMG. I had no idea I could kill a tank with an HMG. I never tried before. Granted, it could have been a gimp tank, but...seriously.
ON TOPIC:
I always though vehicles should reliably die to AV, but that they should be cheap enough to field every game if you wanted. That way vehicles are more like a class (like Assault or Logi or Heavy) and a valid playstyle, without being frustratingly powerful.
I honestly believe it should be no more expensive to field a HAV than it is to field a proto Assault, given that AV remains effective. If they cost the same as a proto assault expect CCP to nerf them even more. Why? At the end of a match, a great tanker and a great assault player will rack up 30:1, but the assault player loses far less than the tanker does. You new players all believe that tanks are easy to use and part of me wants to join dust uni just to give ya'll free tanks just to show you how hard they are to use. I've been playing since the E3 Build so i'm not new. Also the reason why you should expect a nerf if tanks cost the same as proto assault suit is because all of the ar guys will cry for nerfs because there's not enough risk vs reward. Seriously if you've been here longer then a month then you'll know that's how it'll end up if that happened.
Oh and I've used tanks quite a bit so I would know how to be a better AV unit. |
|
|
|