Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Vethosis
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
420
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 14:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
Wouldn't CCP want to give us respecs because it's beta? If you give us respecs we can test new weapons and put feedback on them!!! Since my other thread was deleted because GM vegas said it was a duplicated thread, here this is. And the other thread was for shield tanks, this is for everything, get good CCP. |
KOBLAKA1
Opus Arcana
87
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 14:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Before thus one gets locked? Is dust still beta CCP or is that just typo/missed correction from uprising release? |
Jin Robot
Foxhound Corporation General Tso's Alliance
1078
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 14:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
incoming ban |
Vethosis
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
420
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 14:48:00 -
[4] - Quote
It's in beta, just mouseover announcements. |
Jake Bloodworth
DUST University Ivy League
42
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 14:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
Or, you could play their game and gain the SP necessary to try a new weapon. The need for respecs is gone outside of may heavies and scouts when the rest of the suits are introduced. If you want to try a new weapon, save the SP for it. |
KOBLAKA1
Opus Arcana
87
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 14:52:00 -
[6] - Quote
Vethosis wrote:It's in beta, just mouseover announcements.
yeh i saw in your last thread i want a GM or DEV to answer lol
Jake Bloodworth wrote:Or, you could play their game and gain the SP necessary to try a new weapon. The need for respecs is gone outside of may heavies and scouts when the rest of the suits are introduced. If you want to try a new weapon, save the SP for it.
Thats not his point hes pointing out its still "beta" so why not allow respecs
http://i.imgur.com/sCvj88o.png?1 |
Daedric Lothar
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
723
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 14:56:00 -
[7] - Quote
NB4 Lock |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
4106
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 14:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
Jake Bloodworth wrote:If you want to try a new weapon, save the SP for it. Nothing like gimping your fit for a month or two to enjoy a slightly different playstyle. |
Niuvo
The Phoenix Federation
41
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 15:05:00 -
[9] - Quote
We deserve respecs, after what they did. |
RoundEy3
Metal Mind Industries
131
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 15:11:00 -
[10] - Quote
I could care less either way. Personally I don't give a damn if the person I'm shooting at has done anything with their SP. It means nothing, I just want them to die. |
|
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
802
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 15:16:00 -
[11] - Quote
Is anyone else getting a sense of deja vu? |
WhiteMage7322
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
82
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 15:30:00 -
[12] - Quote
NOPE! If you are asking a respec every time a new weapon is announce then you are being spoiled, wanting everything to be given to you. I bet if CCP does give a respec and the weapon sucks, everyone will start to ask for another respec to go back to their old weapon. I am against any respec if every time a new weapon is getting added to the game. I can support a SP event. |
Vethosis
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
421
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 15:36:00 -
[13] - Quote
I want a respec for a different reason, I don't go for FOTM, I want a respec for my tank. |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
804
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 15:38:00 -
[14] - Quote
Y'know... if CCP defined a respectable (and painful enough) path to a respec then it would at least keep (most of) the threads related to it out of the forums. |
The Attorney General
ZionTCD
142
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 15:42:00 -
[15] - Quote
Vethosis, I can sympathize with you for going into shield tanking, but at the same time, the class is not horrible, nor is it unworkable.
Just because it is out of balance right now versus armor tanks in a fight, does not mean that it will always be that way. Before Uprising, it was shield tanks that had the upper hand. Now the shoe is on the other foot.
It will swing back, you can bet on that.
And when it does I won't be asking for a respec, although that is because by then I should have enough SP to build up a good Gunloggi to go with my fully specced out Madrugar.
Now, if the enforcers were not such trash, maybe I would be SP poor, but thankfully they are not worth speccing into, so I get off relatively easily.
The best advice I can give you, is to roll with an armor tanker full time. I know you can find one in the Tanks R Us channel. Then just play the backup. Whenever your armor buddy gets chased by swarmers, you step in and feed them blasters/missiles.
|
KOBLAKA1
Opus Arcana
87
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 15:44:00 -
[16] - Quote
Vethosis wrote:Wouldn't CCP want to give us respecs because it's beta? If you give us respecs we can test new weapons and put feedback on them!!! Since my other thread was deleted because GM vegas said it was a duplicated thread, here this is. And the other thread was for shield tanks, this is for everything, get good CCP.
IF its still beta in CCPs eyes why no respecs? http://i.imgur.com/sCvj88o.png?1
quit flaming the guy and read more than the title of the thread |
Vethosis
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
421
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 15:45:00 -
[17] - Quote
I'm just going to stick with my LLAV healing tanks/infantry.. |
Jin Robot
Foxhound Corporation General Tso's Alliance
1078
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 15:47:00 -
[18] - Quote
why does beta (if thats your excuse to demand more respecs) mean constant respecs anyway? |
KOBLAKA1
Opus Arcana
87
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 15:49:00 -
[19] - Quote
Jin Robot wrote:why does beta (if thats your excuse to demand more respecs) mean constant respecs anyway?
not necessarily constant (maybe once a month or two) but if it beta that means testing yes?
the more you allow people to test the more feedback you get |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana
456
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 15:50:00 -
[20] - Quote
Crash Monster wrote:Y'know... if CCP defined a respectable (and painful enough) path to a respec then it would at least keep (most of) the threads related to it out of the forums. And if they just didn't nerf the tac AR,didn't release uprising or put the beta tag back in (whatever really) then it would at least have kept (most of) the threads related to it out of the forums aswell.
People spamming the forums with the same demand over and over again does not suddenly become a good thing to do just because you happen to agree with this particular demand. If CCP made changes based on just how many QQ threads they could prevent without caring if they are actually justified we would be playing a bad AR based twitch shooter with teabagging emotes by now. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |